Click here to Skip to main content
Click here to Skip to main content
Go to top

Yet Another C#-style Delegate Class in Standard C++

, 6 Jan 2006
Rate this:
Please Sign up or sign in to vote.
This article describes a C#-style delegate class completely written in standard C++.

Introduction

Delegates and events are definitely cool features of .NET/C# and there are already many attempts to simulate them in standard C++. The Delegate class described in this article tries to provide a complete and easy to use solution for using delegates in standard C++. Your feedback is welcome.

Design Goals

There are already several good delegate implementations on CodeProject. However, there is still no solution good enough for broad developers. For example, some implementations do not support multicast delegates (which is a must for events), some implementations do not support function objects (functors), some implementations are hard to use (syntax). So the design goals of my Deletgate class are:

  • Support all C++ callable entities, including static functions, member functions and functors.
  • Support single-cast and multicast in one Delegate class, so users don't have to implement multicast functionalities themselves.
  • Easy to understand and use.

Examples

1. Using delegates

#include "AcfDelegate.h"
using namespace Acf;

static void H() { ... }

class Foo {
public:
    void G() { ... }
};

class Foo2 {
public:
    void operator()(int n) { ... }
};

// Create delegate a which attaches to a static function
Delegate<void ()> a(&H);
assert(a == &H);

// Create delegate b which attaches
// to an instance and a member function
Foo foo;
Delegate<void ()> b(&foo, &Foo::G);
assert(b == std::make_pair(&foo, &Foo::G);

// Create delegate c from a
Delegate<void ()> c = a;
assert(c == &H);

// Create delegate d which attaches to a function object
Delegate<void (int)> d(Foo2());

// Call delegates
a();
d(100);

// Combine/remove delegates
d += &H;
d += std::make_pair(&foo, &Foo::G);
d -= std::make_pair(&foo, &Foo::G);
d -= &H;

2. Using events

class Button {
public:
    Delegate<void ()> Click;
};

Button btn;
btn.Click += &F;
btn.Click += std::make_pair(&o, &MyObj::G);
btn.Click();
btn.Click -= std::make_pair(&o, &MyObj::G);

3. Using events (advanced)

You may want more control on how event handlers are managed and fired, for example, you care about thread safety.

class Button {
private:
    Delegate<void ()> click;
    Mutex mutex;

public:
    template <class T>
    void add_Click(const T& h) {
        ScopedLock lock(this->mutex);
        this->click += h;
    }
    template <class T>
    void remove_Click(const T& h) {
        ScopedLock lock(this->mutex);
        this->click -= h;
    }

protected:
    void OnClick() { if (this->click) this->click(); }
};

btn.add_Click(&F);
btn.add_Click(std::make_pair(&o, &MyObj::G));

Delegate Class

namespace Acf {

template <class TSignature>
class Delegate; // no body

template <class R, class T1, class T2, ..., class TN>
class Delegate<R (T1, T2, ..., TN)> {
// Constructor/Destructor
public:
    Delegate();
    template <class TFunctor>
    Delegate(const TFunctor& f);
    template <class TPtr, class TFunctionPtr>
    Delegate(const TPtr& obj, const TFunctionPtr& mfp);
    Delegate(const Delegate& d);
    ~Delegate();

// Properties
public:
    bool IsEmpty() const;
    bool IsMulticast() const;

// Methods
public:
    template <class TFunctor>
    void Add(const TFunctor& f);
    template <class TPtr, class TFunctionPtr>
    void Add(const TPtr& obj, const TFunctionPtr& mfp);

    template <class TFunctor>
    bool Remove(const TFunctor& f);
    template <class TPtr, class TFunctionPtr>
    bool Remove(const TPtr& obj, const TFunctionPtr& mfp);

    void Clear();

// Operators
public:
    operator bool() const;
    bool operator!() const;

    template <class TFunctor>
    Delegate& operator=(const TFunctor& f);
    Delegate& operator=(const Delegate& d);

    template <class TFunctor>
    Delegate& operator+=(const TFunctor& f);

    template <class TFunctor>
    friend Delegate operator+(const Delegate& d, const TFunctor& f);
    template <class TFunctor>
    friend Delegate operator+(const TFunctor& f, const Delegate& d);

    template <class TFunctor>
    Delegate& operator-=(const TFunctor& f);

    template <class TFunctor>
    Delegate operator-(const TFunctor& f) const;

    template <class TFunctor>
    friend bool operator==(const Delegate& d, const TFunctor& f);
    template <class TFunctor>
    friend bool operator==(const TFunctor& f, const Delegate& d);

    template <class TFunctor>
    friend bool operator!=(const Delegate& d, const TFunctor& f);
    template <class TFunctor>
    friend bool operator!=(const TFunctor& f, const Delegate& d);

    R operator()(T1, T2, ..., TN) const;
};

} // namespace Acf

The TFunctor template parameter in the Delegate class supports static functions, member functions (via std::pair class that wraps an object pointer and a member function pointer) and functors. The TPtr template parameter for member functions support plain pointers (e.g. Foo*) and smart pointers (e.g. boost::shared_ptr<Foo>).

Notes

  • You must enable runtime type information (RTTI) in your project in order to use the Delegate class.
  • The current implementation supports up to six function parameters, which should be enough for most applications (and in general it's a bad practice to have more than six parameters).
  • There are no operators == and != for comparing delegates, because they are impossible to implement correctly for functors (see boost.function).
  • The current implementation is not optimized for performance. However, it should be OK for most applications.

History

  • 12/24/2005: changed the exception behavior when an empty delegate is called - if the delegate return type is void, then no exception will be thrown, otherwise an InvalidCallException will be thrown.
  • 8/28/2005: initial release.

License

This article has no explicit license attached to it but may contain usage terms in the article text or the download files themselves. If in doubt please contact the author via the discussion board below.

A list of licenses authors might use can be found here

Share

About the Author

Yingle Jia
Web Developer
China China
Yingle Jia is a software engineer located in Beijing, China. He currently works at IBM CSDL (China Software Development Lab). His interests include C++/COM/C#/.NET/XML, etc. He likes coding and writing.
 
He is the creator of ACF (Another C++ Framework) project. See http://acfproj.sourceforge.net/.
 
He also has a blog at http://blogs.wwwcoder.com/yljia/

Comments and Discussions

 
QuestionA correct fix for GNU C++ compiler? PinmemberMatt HK Lo13-Aug-13 1:16 
GeneralMy vote of 5 PinmemberKenB228-Jun-10 4:49 
Generalbrilliant Pinmemberf22-Aug-08 7:38 
Generalstatuc member function [modified] Pinmemberdelaneyj26-Feb-07 21:21 
Generalcompile error with gcc Pinmemberzhangzq7128-Jun-06 21:34 
GeneralEmpty delegates Pinmemberflapflap14-Oct-05 1:36 
GeneralRe: Empty delegates PinmemberYingle Jia15-Jan-06 16:26 
GeneralSome Remarks PinmemberRoland Pibinger5-Sep-05 10:50 
GeneralRe: Some Remarks PinsussYingle Jia5-Sep-05 15:46 
Hi, Roland
 
Thanks for your comments. Here are my answers:
 
1. It's impossible to have a better syntax in current C++. The original syntax is Delegate0<R>, Delegate1<R, T1>, Delegate2<R, T1, T2>, .... However many people do not like it. The function signature is probably the best we can do (at least it has a clear separation of return value and parameters).
 
2. I did not try g++ 3.4, but on g++ 3.2.3 they are just warnings. Maybe you can avoid this by some compiler switch (not sure). I will look at this when I have time. (If you have better solution, don't hestitate to tell me)
 
3. People really asked about comparsion to other delegate implementations (boost.signal, or others delegate classes on CodeProject). It's a good topic, I will try when I update this article later.
 
Ying Le Jia

GeneralRe: Some Remarks PinmemberRoland Pibinger6-Sep-05 7:41 
GeneralRe: Some Remarks PinmemberZac Howland11-Jan-06 20:51 
GeneralRe: Some Remarks PinmemberYingle Jia12-Jan-06 14:50 
GeneralRe: Some Remarks PinmemberZac Howland12-Jan-06 19:26 
GeneralRe: Some Remarks PinmemberYingle Jia15-Jan-06 16:15 
GeneralVariable Template Parameters Pinmemberarmentage1-Sep-05 6:46 
GeneralRe: Variable Template Parameters PinsussYingle Jia1-Sep-05 15:19 
GeneralRe: Variable Template Parameters Pinmemberarmentage6-Sep-05 3:29 
GeneralRe: Variable Template Parameters PinmemberZac Howland11-Jan-06 20:59 
Generalcool! PinsussPeifeng, Gu28-Aug-05 23:23 
GeneralRe: cool! Pinmemberhashimsaleem6-Jul-07 2:42 
GeneralBoost.Signals PinsitebuilderUwe Keim28-Aug-05 3:03 
GeneralRe: Boost.Signals PinsussYingle Jia28-Aug-05 3:50 
GeneralRe: Boost.Signals Pinmemberlxwde28-Aug-05 15:35 
GeneralRe: Boost.Signals PinsussAnonymous29-Aug-05 16:20 
GeneralRe: Boost.Signals PinmemberJohn M. Drescher30-Aug-05 2:14 

General General    News News    Suggestion Suggestion    Question Question    Bug Bug    Answer Answer    Joke Joke    Rant Rant    Admin Admin   

Use Ctrl+Left/Right to switch messages, Ctrl+Up/Down to switch threads, Ctrl+Shift+Left/Right to switch pages.

| Advertise | Privacy | Mobile
Web03 | 2.8.140916.1 | Last Updated 6 Jan 2006
Article Copyright 2005 by Yingle Jia
Everything else Copyright © CodeProject, 1999-2014
Terms of Service
Layout: fixed | fluid