Click here to Skip to main content
Licence 
First Posted 9 May 2006
Views 66,480
Downloads 1,697
Bookmarked 82 times

Parsing the IL of a Method Body

By | 28 Jun 2007 | Article
This article shows how to get a readable and programmable result from the IL array provided by the MethodBody.GetILAsByteArray() method.

Screenshot of the demp

Introduction

.NET offers through its System.Reflection namespace the possibility to inspect an assembly. You can get all of the types defined inside, the fields, the properties and basically all you need. Still, something is missing: the body of a method. When doing a thorough inspection, you would expect to find the variables used, as well as the cycles and the decisions made inside a method body. Microsoft neglected this need, but still they provided us with something: the IL code. This is not enough, however, as it is actually an array of bytes with no meaning whatsoever to the untrained eyes of a normal programmer.

What is needed is a series of objects that represent the actual instructions from that IL code. That is what I want to provide.

Background

Any programmer who has worked with reflection has heard of the awesome reflector written by Lutz Roeder. The reflector can decompile any .NET assembly and provide the user with the equivalent code for each programming element within the given assembly.

You observed that I said "equivalent." This is mainly because the reflection mechanism cannot provide you with the original code. The compilation process removes any comments and unused variables first. Only the valid and necessary code is added to the compiled code. Thus, we cannot obtain the exact code.

The reflector is a wonderful tool, but we might want to obtain similar results with our own code. How can we do that? Let us look first at the classic "hello world" example to see what we want to achieve and what is actually provided to us by the framework. This is the classic C# code:

public void SayHello()
{
    Console.Out.WriteLine("Hello world");
}

When we get the body of the SayHello method using reflection and ask for the IL code, we get an array of bytes such as:

0,40,52,0,0,10,114,85,1,0,112,111,53,0,0,10,0,42

Well, that's not very readable. What we know is that this is IL code and we want to transform it so that we can process it. The easiest way is to transform it to MSIL (Microsoft Intermediate Language). This is what the MSIL code of the SayHello method looks like and what my library is supposed to return:

0000 : nop
0001 : call System.IO.TextWriter System.Console::get_Out()
0006 : ldstr "Hello world"
0011 : callvirt instance System.Void System.IO.TextWriter::WriteLine()
0016 : nop
0017 : ret

Using the code

SDILReader is a library containing only three classes. In order to obtain the MSIL of the body of a method, one must simply create a MethodBodyReader object and pass to its constructor a MethodInfo object of the object you want to decompose.

MethodInfo mi = null;
// obtain somehow the method info of the method we want to dissasemble
// ussually you open the assembly, get the module, get the type and then the 
// method from that type 
// 
...
// instanciate a method body reader
SDILReader.MethodBodyReader mr = new MethodBodyReader(mi);
// get the text representation of the msil
string msil = mr.GetBodyCode();  
// or parse the list of instructions of the MSIL
for (int i=0; i<mr.instructions.Count;i++)
{
    // do something with mr.instructions[i]
}

How's it working

Well, this is the right question. In order to get started, we first need to know the structure of the IL array that is given by the .NET reflection mechanism.

IL code structure

The IL is in fact an enumeration of operations that must be executed. An operation is a pair: <operation code, operand>. The operation code is the the byte value of System.Reflection.Emit.OpCode, while the operand is the address of the metadata information for the entity the operator is working with, i.e. a method, type, value. This address is referred to as the metadata token by the .NET framework. So, in order to interpret the array, we must do something like this:

  • Get the next byte and see what operator we are dealing with.
  • Depending on the operator, the metadata token is defined in the next 1, 2, 3 or 4 bytes. Get the metadata token of the operand.
  • Use the MethodInfo.Module object to retrieve the object whom the metadata token is addressing.
  • Store the pair <operator, operand>.
  • Repeat if we are not at the end of the IL array.

ILInstruction

The ILInstruction class is used for storing the <operator, operand> pair. Also, we have there a simple method that transforms the inner information into a readable string.

MethodBodyReader

The MethodBodyReader class is doing all the hard work. Inside the constructor a private method, ConstructInstructions, is called that parses the IL array:

int position = 0;
instructions = new List<ILInstruction>();
while (position < il.Length)
{
    ILInstruction instruction = new ILInstruction();

    // get the operation code of the current instruction
    OpCode code = OpCodes.Nop;
    ushort value = il[position++];
    if (value != 0xfe)
    {
        code = Globals.singleByteOpCodes[(int)value];
    }
    else
    {
        value = il[position++];
        code = Globals.multiByteOpCodes[(int)value];
        value = (ushort)(value | 0xfe00);
    }
    instruction.Code = code;
    instruction.Offset = position - 1;
    int metadataToken = 0;
    // get the operand of the current operation
    switch (code.OperandType)
    {
        case OperandType.InlineBrTarget:
            metadataToken = ReadInt32(il, ref position);
            metadataToken += position;
            instruction.Operand = metadataToken;
            break;
        case OperandType.InlineField:
            metadataToken = ReadInt32(il, ref position);
            instruction.Operand = module.ResolveField(metadataToken);
            break;
        ....
    }
    instructions.Add(instruction);
}

We see here the simple loop for parsing the IL. Well, it's not quite simple. It actually has 18 cases and I did not take into account all of the operators, only the most common ones. There are 240+ operators. The operators are loaded into two static lists at the start of the application:

public static OpCode[] multiByteOpCodes;
public static OpCode[] singleByteOpCodes;

public static void LoadOpCodes()
{
    singleByteOpCodes = new OpCode[0x100];
    multiByteOpCodes = new OpCode[0x100];
    FieldInfo[] infoArray1 = typeof(OpCodes).GetFields();
    for (int num1 = 0; num1 < infoArray1.Length; num1++)
    {
        FieldInfo info1 = infoArray1[num1];
        if (info1.FieldType == typeof(OpCode))
        {
            OpCode code1 = (OpCode)info1.GetValue(null);
            ushort num2 = (ushort)code1.Value;
            if (num2 < 0x100)
            {
                singleByteOpCodes[(int)num2] = code1;
            }
            else
            {
                if ((num2 & 0xff00) != 0xfe00)
                {
                    throw new Exception("Invalid OpCode.");
                }
                multiByteOpCodes[num2 & 0xff] = code1;
            }
        }
    }
}

Upon constructing the object, we can use the object to either parse the list of instructions or get the string representation of them. That's it; have fun decompiling.

Future work

Well, what's left is to transform the MSIL into C# code.

History

9 May, 2006

Original version posted.

28 June, 2007

After a very long time, I managed to have a look at the issues signaled by the readers of my article. Here are the results:

  • I added support for generics.
  • Now OperandType.InlineTok is also correctly processed.
  • Various other small issues have been fixed.

Be sure to download the sources again from the links at the start of the project.

References

License

This article has no explicit license attached to it but may contain usage terms in the article text or the download files themselves. If in doubt please contact the author via the discussion board below.

A list of licenses authors might use can be found here

About the Author

Sorin Serban

Web Developer

Romania Romania

Member

.Net Developer specialized in ASP.Net 2.0 Applications with AJAX technology

Sign Up to vote   Poor Excellent
Add a reason or comment to your vote: x
Votes of 3 or less require a comment

Comments and Discussions

 
You must Sign In to use this message board. (secure sign-in)
 
Search this forum  
 FAQ
    Noise  Layout  Per page   
  Refresh
BugGood Job! But one thing PinmemberJrrS887:02 21 Jun '11  
GeneralHey man, I just used this in an article of my own PinmvpSacha Barber21:49 6 Jun '11  
GeneralMy vote of 5 Pinmembergouderadrian3:21 19 Jan '11  
GeneralOpcode bit masks as magic numbers PinmemberSAKryukov11:07 8 Jan '11  
GeneralProblem PinmemberStofde7:28 18 Dec '10  
Generalhaving a problem [modified] Pinmemberparagenic14:25 12 Oct '10  
GeneralThanks! PinmemberOleg Zhukov15:33 19 Aug '09  
QuestionContact? PinmemberGreg Ennis6:25 1 Oct '07  
GeneralBug Fix for Generic PinmemberFadrian Sudaman16:50 1 Sep '07  
First of all, thanks for the great works and making this available.
 
I'm trying to use MethodBodyReader to parse IL of method with generic parameters and return type and always get a BadImageFormatException. The previous fix may have resolved the issue with InlineType, but definitely not for InlineField and InlineMethod. You can try it out on methods from container classes in the System.Collection.Generic namespace to see the problem.
 
To fix the issue, I added the Generic Type and Argument parameters to ResolveField, ResolveMethod and ResolveMemember methods so that the Generic context is known for resolving the token. I have also change the member mi type from MethodInfo to MethodBase so that it can cater for constructor as well. We need to differentiate if the MethodBase is MethodInfo or ConstructorInfo. We test the type using "is" operator rather then just using the IsConstructor property as this does not cater for TypeConstructor.
 
case OperandType.InlineField:
   metadataToken = ReadInt32(il, ref position);
   if (mi is ConstructorInfo)
   {
       instruction.Operand = module.ResolveField(metadataToken, 
           mi.DeclaringType.GetGenericArguments(), null);
   }
   else
   {
       instruction.Operand = module.ResolveField(metadataToken, 
           mi.DeclaringType.GetGenericArguments(), mi.GetGenericArguments());
   }
   break;
case OperandType.InlineMethod:
   metadataToken = ReadInt32(il, ref position);
   try
   {                                
       if (mi is ConstructorInfo)
       {
          instruction.Operand = module.ResolveMethod(metadataToken, 
              mi.DeclaringType.GetGenericArguments(), null);
       }
       else                           
       {
          instruction.Operand = module.ResolveMethod(metadataToken, 
              mi.DeclaringType.GetGenericArguments(), mi.GetGenericArguments());
       }
   }
   catch
   {
       if (mi is ConstructorInfo)
       {
          instruction.Operand = module.ResolveMember(metadataToken, 
              mi.DeclaringType.GetGenericArguments(), null);
       }
       else
       {
          instruction.Operand = module.ResolveMember(metadataToken, 
              mi.DeclaringType.GetGenericArguments(), mi.GetGenericArguments());
       }
   }
   break;
 
Although it may be unnecessary, I dont see any harm of adding the Generic Type and Argument parameters to the ResolveType here as well for defense
 
case OperandType.InlineTok:
   metadataToken = ReadInt32(il, ref position);
   try
   {
       if (mi is ConstructorInfo)
       {
           instruction.Operand = module.ResolveType(metadataToken, 
               mi.DeclaringType.GetGenericArguments(), null);
       }
       else
       {
           instruction.Operand = module.ResolveType(metadataToken, 
               mi.DeclaringType.GetGenericArguments(), mi.GetGenericArguments());
       }
   }
   catch
   {
   }
   break;
 
In addition your InlineType should probably cater for Constructor as well
 
case OperandType.InlineType:
    metadataToken = ReadInt32(il, ref position);
    if (this.mi is MethodInfo)
    {
       instruction.Operand = module.ResolveType(metadataToken, 
       this.mi.DeclaringType.GetGenericArguments(), this.mi.GetGenericArguments());
    }
    else if (mi is ConstructorInfo)
    {
        instruction.Operand = module.ResolveType(metadataToken, 
           this.mi.DeclaringType.GetGenericArguments(), null);
    }
    else
    {
        instruction.Operand = module.ResolveType(metadataToken);
    }
    break;
 
Fadrian
GeneralQuestion PinprotectorMarc Clifton3:36 1 Jul '07  
GeneralGreat work PinmemberMoim Hossain7:59 28 Jun '07  
GeneralGeneric context Exception Pinmemberal01175711:33 18 Feb '07  
GeneralRe: Generic context Exception PinmemberSorin Serban6:51 28 Jun '07  
GeneralAnother suggestion PinmemberLeif Wickland8:00 1 Feb '07  
GeneralRe: Another suggestion PinmemberSorin Serban6:52 28 Jun '07  
GeneralThanks, and a bug fix suggestion PinmemberLeif Wickland12:57 31 Jan '07  
GeneralThanx Sorin PinmemberSimon Franklin6:02 8 Jan '07  
Generalconstrained. Pinmembertorq3144:21 15 May '06  
GeneralRe: constrained. PinmemberSorin Serban6:53 28 Jun '07  
GeneralNice! Pinmemberjconwell8:01 9 May '06  
GeneralAmazing PinmemberNinjaCross6:51 9 May '06  

General General    News News    Suggestion Suggestion    Question Question    Bug Bug    Answer Answer    Joke Joke    Rant Rant    Admin Admin   

Use Ctrl+Left/Right to switch messages, Ctrl+Up/Down to switch threads, Ctrl+Shift+Left/Right to switch pages.

Permalink | Advertise | Privacy | Mobile
Web02 | 2.5.120529.1 | Last Updated 28 Jun 2007
Article Copyright 2006 by Sorin Serban
Everything else Copyright © CodeProject, 1999-2012
Terms of Use
Layout: fixed | fluid