Click here to Skip to main content
15,885,366 members
Articles / Desktop Programming / MFC
Article

Keyboard messages/accelerators handling in MFC dialog based applications

Rate me:
Please Sign up or sign in to vote.
4.76/5 (81 votes)
1 Dec 2001CPOL3 min read 503K   102   98
This article explains how you can override PreTranslateMessage and ProcessMessageFilter in dialog based apps

Introduction

There are a substantial number of Windows programmers who insist, often very vehemently, that a programmer should avoid overriding PreTranslateMessage. They have their reasons for saying so and I believe they are correct. But in this article my intention is not to contemplate on whether PreTranslateMessage is good for you or whether you should avoid it like the plague. I have found that PreTranslateMessage can come in quite handy in dialog-based applications for handling keyboard messages. In addition to using PreTranslateMessage I also show you how you can override ProcessMessageFilter for handling accelerator keys in a dialog based application.

Using PreTranslateMessage to handle dialog keystrokes

Very often you hear questions from novice programmers asking how they can trap keystrokes in a dialog based application. Presumably they tried to handle WM_KEYDOWN/WM_KEYUP unsuccessfully. The whole problem is that in a dialog based application the focus is always on one of the child controls and not on the main dialog window. So what do you need to do? You need to override PreTranslateMessage. I'll show you a simple example.

Suppose that you have a dialog based app with a lot of edit boxes on the dialog. It's basically a data entry program and thus you feel it would make it easier for the end-user if pressing the ENTER key would take the focus to the next edit box, just as if he had pressed TAB. The solution is so very easy and straightforward with PreTranslateMessage as I'll demonstrate below.

BOOL CPreTransTestDlg::PreTranslateMessage(MSG* pMsg) 
{
    if(pMsg->message==WM_KEYDOWN)
    {
        if(pMsg->wParam==VK_RETURN)
            pMsg->wParam=VK_TAB;
    }	
    return CDialog::PreTranslateMessage(pMsg);
}

All I have done is to check whether the message is a WM_KEYDOWN, and if it is so, then I check to see if the wParam is VK_RETURN. If I find it so, I change the wParam to VK_TAB and then the base class implementation is called. Easy huh?

Using ProcessMessageFilter to handle dialog-based accelerator keys

Let's say you have a menu in your dialog based app. And you have an accelerator key for some particular task. You'll soon be disappointed to find that the hotkey does not work. The problem is that the modal dialog app's message loop does not call TranslateAccelerator. I do not know why this is so. Presumable the Microsoft team decided that people shouldn't use dialog based apps to write complicated applications, with hotkeys and menus.

But as usual they have suggested a workaround too. Here's is how you go about implementing it. I'd like to state again, that even though this is a Microsoft recommended technique there will be a good majority of MFC gurus, like Joseph Newcomer for example, who would tell you that you shouldn't be doing this. But then sometimes you have to sacrifice elegance for getting things done quickly and with minimum effort.

  • Add a member variable to your CWinApp derived class.
  • HACCEL m_haccel;
  • Use the resource editor to create a new Accelerator, by default it will be named IDR_ACCELERATOR1. And add a new accelerator key that is a short cut for some menu item.
  • Put the following line in your InitInstance just before the line where the CDialog derived object is declared
  • m_haccel=LoadAccelerators(AfxGetInstanceHandle(), 
            MAKEINTRESOURCE(IDR_ACCELERATOR1));
  • Now override ProcessMessageFilter and modify the function so that it looks like :-
    BOOL CPreTransTestApp::ProcessMessageFilter(int code, LPMSG lpMsg) 
    {
        if(m_haccel)
        {
            if (::TranslateAccelerator(m_pMainWnd->m_hWnd, m_haccel, lpMsg)) 
                return(TRUE);
        }
    	
        return CWinApp::ProcessMessageFilter(code, lpMsg);
    }

All we did was to call TranslateAccelerator and if it succeeds then we don't need to call the base class ProcessMessageFilter, as the message has been handled. So we return TRUE.

Disclaimer

The author wishes to state here that the two methods mentioned above are generally used methods and the author is not in any way endorsing these methods. Users should read more on the usage of PreTranslateMessage and ProcessMessageFilter before they use it in their programs.

License

This article, along with any associated source code and files, is licensed under The Code Project Open License (CPOL)


Written By
United States United States
Nish Nishant is a technology enthusiast from Columbus, Ohio. He has over 20 years of software industry experience in various roles including Chief Technology Officer, Senior Solution Architect, Lead Software Architect, Principal Software Engineer, and Engineering/Architecture Team Leader. Nish is a 14-time recipient of the Microsoft Visual C++ MVP Award.

Nish authored C++/CLI in Action for Manning Publications in 2005, and co-authored Extending MFC Applications with the .NET Framework for Addison Wesley in 2003. In addition, he has over 140 published technology articles on CodeProject.com and another 250+ blog articles on his WordPress blog. Nish is experienced in technology leadership, solution architecture, software architecture, cloud development (AWS and Azure), REST services, software engineering best practices, CI/CD, mentoring, and directing all stages of software development.

Nish's Technology Blog : voidnish.wordpress.com

Comments and Discussions

 
GeneralRe: Thank you this is what I was looking for... Pin
Nish Nishant24-Jul-02 15:30
sitebuilderNish Nishant24-Jul-02 15:30 
GeneralRe: Thank you this is what I was looking for... Pin
Anonymous25-Jul-02 2:40
Anonymous25-Jul-02 2:40 
QuestionWin32 API Equivalent? Pin
Atlence24-Jul-02 5:36
Atlence24-Jul-02 5:36 
AnswerRe: Win32 API Equivalent? Pin
Nish Nishant24-Jul-02 15:27
sitebuilderNish Nishant24-Jul-02 15:27 
GeneralCool, but Pin
Rick Crone13-Jun-02 11:22
Rick Crone13-Jun-02 11:22 
GeneralRe: Cool, but Pin
Nish Nishant24-Jul-02 15:31
sitebuilderNish Nishant24-Jul-02 15:31 
GeneralRe: Cool, but Pin
Rick Crone25-Jul-02 3:13
Rick Crone25-Jul-02 3:13 
GeneralRe: Cool, but Pin
Martin Hoedl29-Jul-02 23:24
Martin Hoedl29-Jul-02 23:24 
GeneralRe: Cool, but Pin
Rick Crone31-Jul-02 3:27
Rick Crone31-Jul-02 3:27 
GeneralRe: Cool, but Pin
Nish Nishant31-Jul-02 3:55
sitebuilderNish Nishant31-Jul-02 3:55 
Generalthanks! Pin
marcela12-May-02 11:26
marcela12-May-02 11:26 
GeneralRe: thanks! Pin
Nish Nishant13-May-02 19:13
sitebuilderNish Nishant13-May-02 19:13 
GeneralRe: thanks! Pin
17-May-02 10:23
suss17-May-02 10:23 
GeneralRe: thanks! Pin
Nish Nishant9-Jul-02 8:47
sitebuilderNish Nishant9-Jul-02 8:47 
GeneralPreTranslateMsg - my 0.02 Pin
Tom Archer9-May-02 4:20
Tom Archer9-May-02 4:20 
GeneralRe: PreTranslateMsg - my 0.02 Pin
Tim Smith9-May-02 4:37
Tim Smith9-May-02 4:37 
GeneralRe: PreTranslateMsg - my 0.02 Pin
Nish Nishant13-May-02 19:11
sitebuilderNish Nishant13-May-02 19:11 
GeneralRe: PreTranslateMsg - my 0.02 Pin
Nish Nishant13-May-02 19:09
sitebuilderNish Nishant13-May-02 19:09 
GeneralNicely done - BS grading Pin
Tom Archer9-May-02 4:12
Tom Archer9-May-02 4:12 
GeneralRe: Nicely done - BS grading Pin
Nish Nishant13-May-02 19:07
sitebuilderNish Nishant13-May-02 19:07 
GeneralAvoiding Windows Keys in 2000/NT/98 Pin
MS18-Mar-02 3:59
MS18-Mar-02 3:59 
GeneralRe: Avoiding Windows Keys in 2000/NT/98 Pin
Tom Archer9-May-02 3:16
Tom Archer9-May-02 3:16 

General General    News News    Suggestion Suggestion    Question Question    Bug Bug    Answer Answer    Joke Joke    Praise Praise    Rant Rant    Admin Admin   

Use Ctrl+Left/Right to switch messages, Ctrl+Up/Down to switch threads, Ctrl+Shift+Left/Right to switch pages.