Click here to Skip to main content
Click here to Skip to main content
Technical Blog

Advantages of the Domain Model

, 22 Mar 2011 CPOL
Rate this:
Please Sign up or sign in to vote.
Confining object/relational mapping logic to a clearly demarcated Data Access Layer (DAL) within your application facilitates the creation of a single, coherent, object-oriented Domain Model to represent your application’s business objects. Adherence to this practice leads to more robust, scalable,

Introduction

Prior to arriving at my previous consulting assignment, the company had already completed their first WPF project. The architecture they used on that earlier project included a rather unusual, in my opinion, hybrid object/relational in-memory representation of business objects. Some of the business objects were wrapped in View Models, while the View was directly referencing ADO.NET data rows of other business objects. I initially kept an open mind, programming their new app to that earlier architecture. But I eventually realized that it provided me no way to abstract away from the underlying relational structures. I then spent the weekend refactoring the new app, and building its Data Access Layer. Having broken away from the status quo established by their first WPF project, however, my efforts were not greeted warmly. I had to spend a subsequent weekend producing the below “Advantages of the Domain Model”, as well as the Microsoft Embraces the Domain Model article I posted earlier, for convincing them to go with a purely object-oriented in-memory representation of business objects.

Advantages of the Domain Model

Confining object/relational mapping logic to a clearly demarcated Data Access Layer (DAL) within your application facilitates the creation of a single, coherent, object-oriented Domain Model to represent your application’s business objects. Adherence to this practice leads to more robust, scalable, and maintainable software.

Separation of concerns

View
View Model
Domain Model
Data Access
Data Services

Separation of concerns is a fundamental principle within computer science. As applied to an application’s overall architecture, it provides for organizing a complex software system into separate, but interdependent, parts. The new app’s codebase is easier to understand and maintain than the old app, thanks to the separated Data Access, Domain Model, and View Model layers. The responsibilities of all three layers are lumped into one layer within the old app.

  • Conceptual model - The Domain Model provides a concise representation of the domain of interest. This can aid in communication with experts in the problem domain who are not necessarily developers.
  • Division of labor and organization of code - Need to retrieve or persist data? Then call into the DataAccess singleton. Need to execute some business logic when a condition’s selected field changes? Then go to the Domain Model and put the logic into the Condition.SelectedField setter. Need to tell the View how to display itself differently? Then go to the View Model.
  • Code Reuse - Both the old and new apps contain object-relational mapping logic. The difference is that the new app’s Data Access Layer, by way of generalized functions, eliminates the needless repetition found within the old app’s numerous Load and Save methods.
  • Consistent interface to in-memory data - Hiding the relational model specifics, as is accomplished by the new app’s Data Access Layer, provides a consistent representation of business objects. The View layer in the old app, on the other hand, contains bindings that reference both .NET properties as well as database fields.
  • Maintainability - Because of the separation of responsibility, the new app can be modified more easily when business needs change. Changing a database field’s name, for example, requires a limited maintenance effort in the new app. Since data access is coded concisely in the Data Access Layer, it involves altering just one string.

Increased Productivity

Coding directly to ADO.NET objects, as the old app does, means that you cannot easily navigate the relationships between business objects. The new app’s Data Access Layer, on the other hand, shields upper layers from database specifics. This allows for more natural modeling of data, and simpler handling of complex relationships between entities.

  • The business objects are strongly typed, so we benefit from compile-time type-checking.
  • Business objects’ members expose themselves through Intellisense, eliminating typos and problems with remembering property names.
  • We can navigate the object-oriented Domain Model by using the OO-dot syntax, such as condition.SelectedField.Type.AvailableOperators. That is, we just choose an object instance to be our point-of-entry, then navigate from there. The ADO.NET objects in the old app, on the other hand, don’t allow you to easily navigate the data model.

License

This article, along with any associated source code and files, is licensed under The Code Project Open License (CPOL)

Share

About the Author

Adrian Alexander

United States United States
Adrian loves facilitating suave user experiences via the latest and greatest GUI technologies such as Windows 8 Metro-style apps as well as WPF. More generally, he finds joy in architecting software that is easy to comprehend and maintain. He does so by applying design patterns at the top-level, and by incessantly refactoring code at lower levels. He's always interested in hearing about opportunities for full or part-time development work. He resides in Pennsylvania but can potentially travel anywhere in the country. (Writing about himself in the third-person is Adrian's new hobby.)

Comments and Discussions

 
-- There are no messages in this forum --
| Advertise | Privacy | Terms of Use | Mobile
Web04 | 2.8.141216.1 | Last Updated 22 Mar 2011
Article Copyright 2011 by Adrian Alexander
Everything else Copyright © CodeProject, 1999-2014
Layout: fixed | fluid