 |
|
 |
As others have said C# 3.0 was released years ago, it is a little late to be discussing its features as "new". You also really don't discuss how to use the features of C# 3.0, just give some code snippets. Finally the screen shots are not of very high quality.
Just because the code works, it doesn't mean that it is good code.
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
This is really nothing more than a small hack job on some new features. As it is, this is pretty much useless to developers of any level.
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
Looks like the article is just used to link a reputable site to his blog and therefore generate traffic.
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
I realise how long it takes to prepare an article, and what you have provided is factually accurate, so I don't want to downvote you, bu:
- There aren't any new features in C# 3.0, it is already nearly 4 years old (OK, obviously there are newer features over C# 2.0). Your replies that your personal site deals with newer framework versions is not a good one: I come to the CodeProject because it is a trusted source. You'd be better off re-publishing your other stuff here, you can still link back to your personal site!
- I'd personally like to see some analysis of the practical uses of the syntax and drawbacks
I don't want to be discouraging, your article is otherwise clear and accurate, so please do not take what I have said as severe criticism.
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
i don't see the point of this "article"
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
You posted an article about .NET 3 and then picked .NET 2 as a target. You might want to remove that tag.
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
Simple question. Why?
Old version of C# combined with a badly written article. You used images for code examples.
Just terrible.
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
updated with c# 4.0 new features reference that i posted on my site . Thanks for your feedback
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
 |
|
 |
updated with c# 4.0 new features reference that i posted on my site . Thanks for your valid comments
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
You're about 4 years too late with this, making your article completely irrelevant. On top of that, there was more new than what you've covered, and this topic was covered much better in other articles.
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
updated with c# 4.0 new features reference that i posted on my site . Thanks for your valid comments
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
Yeah, even 4.0 is over a year old now. Plus, you dont discuss anything. You're just posting code snippets, which doesn't make a good article.
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
It's a long time when C# 3.0 was released. Now C# 4.0 is also an old topic and we are looking for the vNext version of C#. At this time, an article with title "New Features of C# 3.0" looks very odd, IMHO. You may get a no. of downvotes for that too. I will give you a vote of 3 only because it is so late for this.
Explore C# 4.0 and if possible try to find out the new features of C# vNext like Async and post articles on those.
Silverlight 5 Tutorials : 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
Is there a rule in CP that only the articles on the latest topics be blogged???? By the way, what is the meaning of "In which generation are you living?" ? Do you know something called as "grammar"?
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
Do you know something known as "grammar"..
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
Unless you are being incredibly ironic, when correcting someone else's grammar, it's customary not to have grammar mistakes of your own.
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
updated with c# 4.0 new features reference that i posted on my site . Thanks for your valid comments
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
...to call the article "New features of c# 3.0". You know, it's more than a year since c# 4.0 was released, not speaking about the fact that there are several articles on CP that cover exactly the same topic and some of them are from 2007.
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
Probably a title called "Old Features of C# 3.0" will sound good in this case.
Silverlight 5 Tutorials : 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
@Kunal, We understand you have become a star blogger now... but please read your own first blog posts... It is fine if you cannot encourage, but stop making fun and discouraging... Your comment shows your immaturity and lack of respect for others!!!!
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
It's not about star or beginner and nothing related to first or current article. Here I am not discouraging him too. If you read my message properly, you should not comment like this.
Silverlight 5 Tutorials : 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
Thanks for the interesting post. I'm new at this but couldn't the first 8 lines of the linq example be simplified to
var intArray = new List<int> { 11, 20, 7, 30 };
var evenNumber = intArray.Where(n => n % 2 == 0);
|
|
|
|
 |