Click here to Skip to main content
Click here to Skip to main content

Enumerating serial ports - W2K style.

By , 20 Jul 2002
 

Introduction

You might think that determining which serial ports are present on a Windows PC would be an easy task. It seems like a reasonable enough thing for the OS to support. Unfortunately, there was no support for it at all (short of reading the registry yourself) before Win2K, and even then, the API is a bit cumbersome.

The attached serial port enumeration code first determines which operating system it is running under, and then runs the appropriate routine to enumerate the serial ports. In Win 9x (and Me) it uses the registry. In W2K and later it uses the SetupAPI that was included in that version of the WinSDK. It also has support for "brute force" enumeration of serial ports under NT4.

Unfortunately, I statically linked with setupapi.lib, so the provided executable won't actually run under 95 and nt4 (I didn't really need to support those OS's for my application.) This could be finagled by replacing the SetupDi* function calls with dynamic binding via LoadLibrary if needed.

To use the EnumSerial code, simply include EnumSerial.cpp and .h in your project, and link with setupapi.lib in the win32 sdk (this is under "additional dependencies" in the project link settings in Visual Studio).

All you have to do now is #include "EnumSerial.h" in your source code, allocate an empty CArray of SSerInfo structs, and make a call to EnumSerialPorts. It will populate your array with filled-out SSerInfo structs which contain the following information:

CString strDevPath;      // Device path for use with CreateFile()
CString strPortName;     // Simple name (i.e. COM1)
CString strFriendlyName; // Full name to be displayed to a user
BOOL bUsbDevice;         // Provided through a USB connection?
CString strPortDesc;     // friendly name without the COMx

Example

CArray<SSerInfo,SSerInfo&> asi;
EnumSerialPorts(asi,FALSE/*include all*/);

License

This article has no explicit license attached to it but may contain usage terms in the article text or the download files themselves. If in doubt please contact the author via the discussion board below.

A list of licenses authors might use can be found here

About the Author

Zach Gorman
United States United States
Member
No Biography provided

Sign Up to vote   Poor Excellent
Add a reason or comment to your vote: x
Votes of 3 or less require a comment

Comments and Discussions

 
Hint: For improved responsiveness ensure Javascript is enabled and choose 'Normal' from the Layout dropdown and hit 'Update'.
You must Sign In to use this message board.
Search this forum  
    Spacing  Noise  Layout  Per page   
GeneralUSB/Serial cables in Win98 &amp; WinMEmemberHoward C. Anderson10 Nov '03 - 5:26 
QuestionHow to identify application which has access to port?memberJoerg Hoffmann10 Apr '03 - 23:35 
AnswerRe: How to identify application which has access to port?memberZach Gorman11 Apr '03 - 5:00 
QuestionAny idea how to get friendly names on NT?memberJoerg Hoffmann10 Apr '03 - 4:54 
AnswerRe: Any idea how to get friendly names on NT?memberZach Gorman10 Apr '03 - 6:19 
GeneralRe: Any idea how to get friendly names on NT?memberJoerg Hoffmann10 Apr '03 - 20:22 
GeneralFTDI(Win98) and PCI modem(WinXP)sussPabloII22 Dec '02 - 20:59 
GeneralRe: FTDI(Win98) and PCI modem(WinXP)memberZach Gorman7 Jan '03 - 9:40 
GeneralRe: FTDI(Win98) and PCI modem(WinXP)memberChristian B21 Apr '03 - 9:05 
GeneralRe: FTDI(Win98) and PCI modem(WinXP)memberSamuliA4 Sep '06 - 23:26 
GeneralRe: FTDI(Win98) and PCI modem(WinXP)membergrandmasta14 Nov '07 - 21:32 
GeneralData Structure Item Missing in EnumPortsWdmmemberavidgator7 Aug '02 - 5:25 
GeneralRe: Data Structure Item Missing in EnumPortsWdmmemberZach Gorman10 Aug '02 - 7:36 
GeneralRe: Data Structure Item Missing in EnumPortsWdmmemberChristian B21 Apr '03 - 9:02 
GeneralRe: Data Structure Item Missing in EnumPortsWdmmemberPeter Wurmsdobler10 Jun '04 - 3:40 
GeneralToo complicated -> use GetDefaultCommConfig()memberAndre Gleichner22 Jul '02 - 2:17 
GeneralRe: Too complicated -> use GetDefaultCommConfig()memberZach Gorman22 Jul '02 - 18:27 
GeneralRe: Too complicated -> use GetDefaultCommConfig()memberJoerg Hoffmann24 Apr '03 - 21:46 
GeneralRe: Too complicated -&gt; use GetDefaultCommConfig()memberMike Pulice23 Dec '03 - 6:26 
GeneralRe: Too complicated -&gt; use GetDefaultCommConfig()memberZach Gorman4 Jan '04 - 14:23 
GeneralRe: Too complicated -&gt; use GetDefaultCommConfig() [modified]memberCrashTest31 Aug '09 - 9:22 

General General    News News    Suggestion Suggestion    Question Question    Bug Bug    Answer Answer    Joke Joke    Rant Rant    Admin Admin   

Permalink | Advertise | Privacy | Mobile
Web01 | 2.6.130516.1 | Last Updated 21 Jul 2002
Article Copyright 2002 by Zach Gorman
Everything else Copyright © CodeProject, 1999-2013
Terms of Use
Layout: fixed | fluid