 |
|
 |
C# (C# 2.0, C# 3.0, C#), Javascript, XML, XHTML, HTML, Windows (TabletPC, Windows, Win2K, WinXP, Win2003, Vista), .NET (.NET, .NET 3.5, .NET 3.0, .NET 2.0), ASP.NET, Win32, Win64, SQL Server (SQL 2000, SQL 2005, SQL Server), IIS (IIS 6, IIS 7, IIS), Visual Studio (VS2005, VS2008, Visual Studio), ADO.NET, SysAdmin, Architect, Dev
Since this is an ASP.NET framework how does it apply to Windows (TabletPC, Windows, Win2K, WinXP, Win2003, Vista) or Win32 or Win64. Seems like you just clicked everything you could to increase the hits.
only two letters away from being an asset
modified on Thursday, July 24, 2008 3:57 PM
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
Read the actual article. It includes a Windows service library that runs on Windows 2000, XP, 2003, Vista, 32-bit and 64-bit. It's also compatible w/ .NET v2.0 and later. It contains a database library as well. It's a suite to let you do everything you might possibly need to do for a web app. For instance, in one of my apps we have a service that needs to periodically run an external web service and then update our database.
Check out the links in the article. You shouldn't be spamming articles without actually reading and trying the code given.
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
Don't get testy son. Show some common courtesy and appreciation for the difficult and thankless job the CP staff have. You know the scope of your article and code don't rely on the CP staff to do your work, choose the categories yourself, don't pick them all.
only two letters away from being an asset
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
I didn't pick them all. Otherwise there would be a lot more in that list. You don't see "Java," "PHP," or "MySQL" in there. I picked the ones I thought were pertinent. When you go to submit an article, it says "Article Attributes: Please select all that apply" not "please select every category you want to put this under." So I put every attribute I thought applied.
I do appreciate all the hard work the CP staff do. If they disagree with the attribute selection, that's perfectly fine. I just put everything I thought it had to do with.
I'm fine with constructive criticism - but the tone and wording of your posts ("only two letters away from being an asset," "Seems like you just clicked everything you could to increase the hits," "Don't get testy son," "Show some common courtesy") seems demeaning and rude. There's no need for that.
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
David Hoyt wrote: rude. There's no need for that.
Words to take to heart from you as well.
David Hoyt wrote: Read the actual article.
You shouldn't be spamming articles without actually reading and trying the code given.
Take some advise, people aren't going to read the code if the article isn't written well, or the title and other visible properties are misleading. Fact of life, get used to it.
Sorry if you don't get the joke with the signature, others do. If a signature bothers you, then you have more issues and should not take it so seriously.
only two letters away from being an asset
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
You're right - I apologize for being rude.
I didn't know it was a signature and in light of the posts, it seemed derogatory.
I explained that there was no intention of being misleading in any way whatsoever. If you want to be constructive, just say something along the lines:
"It would be better if you limit the number of article attributes to just a few. Only the ones that have direct correlation with the article."
But please stop insulting me. Thank you.
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
This is still an unedited contribution. The Code Project staff can change the categories to be anything they want. I just put everything I felt pertained to it. If they decide something else, I will, of course, abide by it.
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
I think Mark woke up on the wrong side of the bed.
Great work. Diving into it now.
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
Thanks Marc. I'm looking to open source this on CodePlex or SourceForge. Is it okay to just provide a link to the project there so people can always just download the latest and greatest?
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
Calling it spam and asking you not to be rude...
|
|
|
|
 |
|