Having finally reached the user-interface implementation step in my current programming project, I must first lay the foundation for the program's tabbed document interface
(TDI). It's a TDI of the style seen in Firefox and Internet Explorer, where each tab includes it's own close button. Additionally, in my program the set of tabs is fixed and the user can reopen a tab (via a menu) after it's been closed, which makes it appear at its original position. WPF's standard
control doesn't have a close button, so in order to include such a tab in your own program you must find or create a custom control that does the job. You can download the result
of my effort—a Visual Studio 2005 solution—here (updated 2008-Feb-11)
and provides the functionality you need to easily add close buttons to your program's tabs. The sample application additionally includes for each tab a corresponding item on the 'Tabs' menu, with a check mark indicating the tab's current visibility. After a tab has been closed, a check mark no longer appears on it's menu item. This provides a means for the user to reopen a previously closed tab by selecting a menu item with no check mark. If the user selects a menu item that's currently checked, the item gets unchecked and the tab is closed. But I am not sure this latter behaviour is the most natural/useful. Perhaps it would be better if, rather than closing the tab, it gets selected and it's contents are brought to the front. In that case, I would rename the menu from 'Tabs' to 'Switch Tabs' similar to the 'Switch Windows' menu in Microsoft Word 2007. I am not sure which behaviour would make for a better user experience, so please send me your feedback.
Soon after I started creating the custom control, I came across a blog post
which looked like it already did the work for me. Upon looking at the solution's source code, however, I became disappointed with it's architecture. Rather than reusing the
of it's parent
type by deriving from it, it completely replaces them. This flows contrary to the object-oriented principles of code reuse which I have internalised. So I decided to continue creating my own custom control. At first I thought that after adding the
attribute onto my custom control's
element, I'd just need to write a few lines of code then be done with it. But it actually took more work than that, involving WPF features such as data templating, property bindings, and routed commands. The resulting custom style code is a lot shorter than the competition's, though—less than 90 lines as opposed to about 170—so I consider it an improvement.