Click here to Skip to main content
Click here to Skip to main content

User Login For WinForm Applications

By , 2 Oct 2008
 
LogonDemo

Introduction

A question was posed in the C# forum today about logging in to an application using the user's Windows account. In essence, if the user is logged into his account, and he tries to run an application, it's kind of pointless (and annoying) to re-request his login info. However, making a user login to an application does allow the programmer to dictate the terms, specifically, what roles the user has on the computer in question. This article demonstrates not only this aspect of application access, but also allows the program to have its own xml-based database of users.

The Windows Authentication Problem

Since we don't have to worry about the user's name and/or password, this process is reduced to a much easier task - determining if the user is in an acceptable group/role. With the .Net framework, this is easy as pie, involving just three lines of code:

using System.Security.Principal;

public bool UserInSystemRole(WindowsBuiltInRole role)
{
    WindowsIdentity  identity = WindowsIdentity.GetCurrent();
    WindowsPrincipal principal = new WindowsPrincipal(identity);
    return principal.IsInRole(role);
}

The function above is from the supplied sample application, and is called by passing the desired WindowsBuiltInRole ordinal (like WindowsBuiltInRole.Administrator). You can also check for custom roles such as "MySuperRole". Below is the function from the sample application:

using System.Security.Principal;

public bool UserInCustomRole(string role)
{
    WindowsIdentity  identity = WindowsIdentity.GetCurrent();
    WindowsPrincipal principal = new WindowsPrincipal(identity);
    return principal.IsInRole(role);
}

Sometimes, .Net really does make things too easy on us. :)

The Application Authentication Problem

When you want something application-specific, this is probably the best way to go. The data file can be stored on any network share (for easy administration), and you can go as far as you want or need regarding security. For this sample application, I chose not to implement any kind of encryption or hashing of passwords because that's not what this article is about (and I pretty much didn't feel like doing it). Here's the function used to authenticate via the application's XML-based user database:

public bool ValidateApplicationUser(string userName, string password)
{
    bool validUser = false;

    // if you want to do encryption, I recommend that you encrypt the password 
    // here so that you don't have to mess with the LINQ query below, but you 
    // can still do a direct comparison.

    try
    {
        // setup the filename
        string fileName = System.IO.Path.Combine(Application.StartupPath, "users.xml");

        // load the file
        XDocument users = XDocument.Load(fileName);

        // query the file with LINQ - this query only returns one record from 
        // the file, and only if the user name and password match.
        XElement userElement = (from subitem in 
                    (from item in users.Descendants("user") select item) 
                     where subitem.Element("name").Value.ToLower() == userName.ToLower() 
                     && subitem.Element("password").Value == password 
                     select subitem).SingleOrDefault();

        // if you get here without an exception, and if the returned XElement isn't null
        // then the user is valid
        validUser = (userElement != null);
    }

    catch (Exception ex)
    {
        if (ex != null) {}
    }

    return validUser;
}

Notice that we used our new friend, LINQ, again. LINQ is just too handy to ignore. While I wouldn't use it all the time, it's great for dealing with XML files like our user database.

Notes 

You can easily combine the application-specific authentication with the role validation to further control access to your applications. 

The provided sample application has NOT been thoroughly tested (I simply don't have the time right now), so run your login code through the debugger a couple of times to make sure it's going to do what you want it to do.

History

10/03/2008: Changed the LINQ statement that retrieves the userElement in the ValidateApplicationUser() method to return null instead of waiting for an exception in the event that the user isn't found. I did not change the code in the download file, so remember to make the same change in your own code.

10/02/2008: Original article posted.

  

License

This article, along with any associated source code and files, is licensed under The Code Project Open License (CPOL)

About the Author

John Simmons / outlaw programmer
Software Developer (Senior)
United States United States
Member
I've been paid as a programmer since 1982 with experience in Pascal, and C++ (both self-taught), and began writing Windows programs in 1991 using Visual C++ and MFC. In the 2nd half of 2007, I started writing C# Windows Forms and ASP.Net applications, and have since done WPF, Silverlight, WCF, web services, and Windows services.
 
My weakest point is that my moments of clarity are too brief to hold a meaningful conversation that requires more than 30 seconds to complete. Thankfully, grunts of agreement are all that is required to conduct most discussions without committing to any particular belief system.

Sign Up to vote   Poor Excellent
Add a reason or comment to your vote: x
Votes of 3 or less require a comment

Comments and Discussions

 
Hint: For improved responsiveness ensure Javascript is enabled and choose 'Normal' from the Layout dropdown and hit 'Update'.
You must Sign In to use this message board.
Search this forum  
    Spacing  Noise  Layout  Per page   
GeneralMy vote of 5memberYoda018 Aug '12 - 0:19 
QuestionCongradulationsmemberMember 362447927 Feb '12 - 7:27 
QuestionHow to do this against a database?memberernieball_261 Feb '12 - 10:11 
AnswerRe: How to do this against a database?mvpJohn Simmons / outlaw programmer1 Feb '12 - 11:25 
GeneralRe: How to do this against a database?memberchenandczh21 Feb '12 - 15:29 
Questionconfused by too many negativesmemberMember 243456418 Aug '11 - 4:30 
Hi,
I'm not sure if I'm missing something here but I can't get my head around the logic used in the buttonOK_Click handler - it may be too many negatives but I'm not sure.
 
Consider the default case where the form has the "Use Windows Authentication" and "Don't Care" options selected.
 
When I click OK it correctly deduces that radioMustBeAdmin is not checked and bypasses the UserInsystemRole(Admin) test. However it then checks whether the radioCanBeAdmin option is not checked (it isn't so the test succeeds) and then tests whether I am not an administrator and, since I am an administrator, the authentication fails !!!
 
Similarly if I select the "Must be Admin" option it verifies that I am an admin and then, because the radioCanBeAdmin checkbox is not checked, it fails me because I am not not-a member of the admin group.
 
or am I missing something?
 
TTFN
ST
Questionif (ex != null) { }memberAlexander M. Batishchev26 Jun '11 - 6:37 
AnswerRe: if (ex != null) { }mvpJohn Simmons / outlaw programmer27 Jun '11 - 11:43 
GeneralRe: if (ex != null) { }memberAlexander M. Batishchev27 Jun '11 - 20:15 
GeneralMy vote of 5memberSAKryukov15 May '11 - 12:14 
GeneralMy vote of 4memberddboarm25 Dec '10 - 22:18 
GeneralGood aarticlememberDonsw22 Jan '09 - 11:20 
GeneralVery nice article JohnmvpSacha Barber13 Oct '08 - 7:52 
GeneralRe: Very nice article JohnmvpJohn Simmons / outlaw programmer13 Oct '08 - 8:00 
GeneralRe: Very nice article JohnmvpSacha Barber13 Oct '08 - 8:02 
GeneralChange To ArticlemvpJohn Simmons / outlaw programmer2 Oct '08 - 23:26 
GeneralSome suggestionsmemberN a v a n e e t h2 Oct '08 - 17:32 
GeneralRe: Some suggestions [modified]mvpJohn Simmons / outlaw programmer2 Oct '08 - 23:10 
GeneralRe: Some suggestionsmemberN a v a n e e t h5 Oct '08 - 17:23 
GeneralYour workmembernelsonpaixao2 Oct '08 - 13:37 
GeneralUsefulmemberDaveyM692 Oct '08 - 12:36 
GeneralNice, but some suggestions...membermarco_br2 Oct '08 - 10:50 
GeneralNice, but some suggestions... (correction)membermarco_br2 Oct '08 - 10:53 
GeneralRe: Nice, but some suggestions... (correction)mvpJohn Simmons / outlaw programmer2 Oct '08 - 11:04 
AnswerRe: Nice, but some suggestions... (correction)membermarco_br3 Oct '08 - 1:43 
GeneralNice use of Linq in there.mvpPete O'Hanlon2 Oct '08 - 10:23 
GeneralRe: Nice use of Linq in there.mvpJohn Simmons / outlaw programmer2 Oct '08 - 10:46 
GeneralRe: Nice use of Linq in there.memberJean-Paul Mikkers2 Oct '08 - 10:59 
GeneralRe: Nice use of Linq in there.memberjpsstavares3 Oct '08 - 0:05 
GeneralRe: Nice use of Linq in there.mvpPete O'Hanlon2 Oct '08 - 11:02 

General General    News News    Suggestion Suggestion    Question Question    Bug Bug    Answer Answer    Joke Joke    Rant Rant    Admin Admin   

Permalink | Advertise | Privacy | Mobile
Web03 | 2.6.130516.1 | Last Updated 2 Oct 2008
Article Copyright 2008 by John Simmons / outlaw programmer
Everything else Copyright © CodeProject, 1999-2013
Terms of Use
Layout: fixed | fluid