|
|
Comments and Discussions
|
|
 |
|

|
You said that Conoslas is no. 3 and Lucida Console is no. 2 on the CodeProject list of best programming fonts, when in fact Conosolas is the second and Lucida Console is the third.
Also there is a problem with formatting or it's something wrong with CodeProject itself but I have horizontal scrollbar.
Great article!
|
|
|
|

|
Mladen Jankovic wrote: in fact Conosolas is the second and Lucida Console is the third.
You're correct, thanks. [update: should be good now]
What's your browser window size and how much do you have to scroll?
modified on Friday, October 10, 2008 7:28 PM
|
|
|
|

|
Hans Dietrich wrote: What's your browser window size and how much do you have to scroll?
IE7@1680x1050, but I don't see anything in your article that can't fit and cause h-scrolling, it's more like a problem for Chris&Co.
|
|
|
|

|
I will fix in next update.
|
|
|
|

|
Well, I tried to fix it, but could not. Chrome also shows a scroll bar, after you resize the browser window.
|
|
|
|

|
I bought it once upon a time as part of the "More Fonts for Windows" package, and I've enjoyed it quite a lot. One interesting feature is that while it's a uniform-stroke-width sans-serif font, it the italic version has letterform changes typical of italic fonts (e.g. the non-italic "a" has a flag on top, but the italic "a" has a full-sized bowl with no flag. The non-italic "l" has a flag on top but nothing the bottom; the italic "l" has a right-facing flag on the bottom (the "1" has flags a flag on top and a bar on the bottom). The "0" is not slashed, but is very distinct from the "O".
Anyone else ever seen that font?
PS--I would second the request for a sample including O0 Ll1| `"' etc. since those characters can be tricky. Also, it would be helpful if in text you don't just refer to whether the zero is slashed, but whether it is distinct.
Addendum: Financial has filenames mlsan.ttf through mlsaq.ttf and was sold by MicroLogic Software, Inc.
modified on Friday, October 10, 2008 2:14 PM
|
|
|
|

|
I will see if I can find Financial.
supercat9 wrote: I would second the request for a sample including O0 Ll1| `"'
I would like to do this in the context of code (preferable xml, which won't start a language war). Can you suggest a code snippet?
|
|
|
|

|
There are online reports that Financial is a forged font. I don't know if this is true or not, but I haven't found it on any legitimate font site.
|
|
|
|

|
| There are online reports that Financial is a forged font. I don't know if this is true or not, but I haven't found it on any legitimate font site.
Well, it was in a collection I bought some time back. I just plugged a sample of the italic into WhatTheFont and it suggested Letter Gothic 12 Pitch Italic. That's probably what it's based on, though none of the font sets I'd seen with a Letter Gothic or imitator included the italics.
|
|
|
|

|
I hate to mention this, but I simply must:
"... It's Its only drawback ..."
|
|
|
|

|
Thanks! If I was using a better font I might have spotted that myself.
|
|
|
|

|
Hans Dietrich wrote: Thanks! If I was using a better font I might have spotted that myself.
I know what you mean. I recently noticed something I'd written some months ago, thanking someone: "Thank's" --- aaarrgh!
Though, in my case, I blame it on the ubiquity of the "thank's" misspelling corrupting me. I fear it's only a small matter of time before I mix "their" and "there!"
|
|
|
|

|
It's hard to find, but Monospace 821 BT has been my favorite for years now. For sheer clarity, though, Monaco still beats it (especially at 10pt or lower).
|
|
|
|
|

|
Being able to distinguish between characters that in many fonts look nearly or exactly the same is really important. Adding these three lines (or something similar that shows this stuff) would make the comparison much more useful: lnt foob1x = {(0)} "'foo`'bar" int foOblx = ((O)) 'foo`bar`' |nt f0obIx = {{o}} '"foo"'
|
|
|
|

|
Done. Thanks for the suggestion.
|
|
|
|

|
you did it totally wrong -- you're antialiasing for BGR subpixel order, which is "very rare" as Microsoft ClearType tuner says.
most viewers have RGB order on their monitors, and these screenshots will look weird and blurry to them.
|
|
|
|

|
So that is the reason! Anyways, I posted a comment on that too, with what I see on my screen.
xacc.ide - now with TabsToSpaces support IronScheme - 1.0 beta 1 - coming soon ((lambda (x) `((lambda (x) ,x) ',x)) '`((lambda (x) ,x) ',x))
|
|
|
|
|

|
Looks much better here...
|
|
|
|
|

|
Looks good now after a Ctrl + F5
xacc.ide - now with TabsToSpaces support IronScheme - 1.0 beta 1 - coming soon ((lambda (x) `((lambda (x) ,x) ',x)) '`((lambda (x) ,x) ',x))
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
General News Suggestion Question Bug Answer Joke Rant Admin
|
This article presents commonly used programming fonts with examples of each font in ClearType and non-ClearType.
| Type | Article |
| Licence | CPOL |
| First Posted | 9 Oct 2008 |
| Views | 374,592 |
| Bookmarked | 139 times |
|
|