As mentioned, parsing the points in an SVG polygon would be a lot easier (and quicker?) if we had the
strtod function in C#.
Well, let’s give it a go! Now, dealing with floating point numbers is tricky so I’m probably going to mess it up on some corner cases,
so to limit the damage we’re going to create some tests that our function must be able to handle. These tests will also help create our specification, hopefully!
First of all, how accurate do we have to be? Well, §4.3 states:
a number has the capacity for at least a single-precision floating point number
It also goes on to mention that it’s preferable that double-precision be used for calculations, so we may as well parse to double to aid in calculations,
knowing that any value stored in the SVG should fall within a valid range.
So, how many digits are we going to parse? What Every Computer Scientist Should
Know About Floating-Point Arithmetic by David Goldberg is by far the best work on trying to understand floating point numbers. I don’t claim to understand it all,
however, in the precision section he mentions that 17 digits are enough to recover
a double precision binary number. However, that’s not quite correct – 17 significant digits are required, as
000000000012345678901234567 are the same number.
Here’s what we’ll test (also making sure that the whole string is read):
What happens when the value is too small (as in very close to zero, not as in a negative number is outside of the valid range) or too large to represent?
System.Double.Parse makes numbers that are too small to be represented by
double silently underflow into zero. This also happens
when converting a very small
float. However, if the number is outside the range of
System.OverflowException. This doesn’t make sense to me, especially since casting a big
float will convert it to infinity.
In this situation,
HUGE_VAL and this is the route I’ll take – numbers that are too big to fit inside the range
double will be returned as +/- infinity and numbers that are very close to zero that
double cannot represent will be truncated to zero.
Therefore, our tests will make sure the following happen (again making sure all input is read):
Infinity/Not a Number
There’s an interesting point to take into consideration when parsing – the SVG specification seems
to only allows numbers, yet in XML, INF, -INF and NaN are valid.
When parsing we’ll try to be as flexible as possible, so will allow "Inf", "Infinity" and "NaN" (all case-insensitive).
The number section of the standard gives the following EBNF grammar for a valid number:
integer ::= [+-]? [0-9]+
number ::= integer ([Ee] integer)?
| [+-]? [0-9]* "." [0-9]+ ([Ee] integer)?
What’s interesting about this is that numbers with a trailing decimal point are invalid (i.e
0. doesn’t match the grammar). We’ll assume that’s an oversight
and allow it (
strtod have no problems with it.) However, we need to be careful that a single decimal point is not parsed.
Testing this is a bit more involved, as
strtod will parse as much of the input as it can, so while
0e++0 looks invalid, our function
should be able to parse the first zero and then stop when it gets to the
e. To test this we therefore need to make sure that our function does not consume
the whole string, just the first few characters.
Think that’s all for now. Here’s the test cases; the actual class will follow later.
Eventually I’d like to allow for different culture settings, but for now I’m concentrating on the SVG spec.