This paper describes how to stop a run-away process. There
are a few common reasons to do this: you have a bug in a device driver that
can’t be shutdown in a normal way, to disable malware long enough to update and
run anti-virus tools, a third party
application was so badly written it is malfunctioning and it won’t close from
the task manager.
Under Windows, a process has a message pump and it can
receive commands. When it is well behaved, the application will close if it
receives certain commands. In extreme cases, it may not respond or in the case
of malware been designed to ignore these commands. A process will end when it
has no more threads left, and that is a somewhat extreme way to close the
This article explores some of the methods known to the
author, there are likely more but this should serve as a good introduction to
Processes run for a reason. Stopping them abruptly could
cause a disk sector to be corrupted or the PC to behave strangely or lock up.
When the PC is already behaving strangely due to malware or badly written
software there is a sliding scale of which methods are appropriate ranging from
politely asking the application to stop to doing things that are done in
System.Diagnostics.Process object has a
method that sends a windows manager close message to the applications message
pump. This is the … polite way of asking an application to close. The
application may or may not have been written to automatically close, or may jam
while attempting to close, or ignore the message. The application may not have
a MainWindowHandle yet, there is a time during an application creation that it
is running but hasn’t asked for a window handle yet. Some processes without a
UI might not have a window handle.
System.Diagnostics.Process Kill() function is akin
to using the TaskManager to end a process. It is the only way to end a process
that doesn’t have a user interface. And if the process is accessing data, the
process might not have a chance to clean up before closing. Killing a process
may cause a loss of data. For example, killing a malware in the process of
rewriting a key system DLL may cause the DLL to be corrupt, or it could keep
the malware from deleting all of your files. Kill will not work if the process
has turned itself into a system critical process (there are at least two ways
it could do that with either
NtSetInformationProcess in ntdll.dll).
This is likely more extreme than Kill, MSDN describes that
it might leave shared DLL’s with global data in an intermediate state because
the process ends abruptly. It’s described as halting threads and requesting all
I/O canceled. In theory unless the process has made blocking kernel calls that
don’t cancel the process will stop. There are a few cases (API blocking on a
kernel call that won’t return) where this call won’t work.
This call doesn’t actually stop a process, but it will turn
it rather safely into a process that can’t execute that can then be killed. The
System.Diagnostics.Process API can be used to get the thread IDs which can be
used to get a thread handle (with appropriate permissions) and then be used to
suspend the thread. The advantage to this technique is the process is alive but
rendered harmless. In the case of Malware, where multiple processes monitor
each other and relaunch as needed this may enough to disable the Malware, and
then either attempt to kill and remove or update anti-virus protection.
Priority and Affinity
Every processor has a priority associated with it, and an
affinity for processor core. As it relates to the topic at hand, this means a
process might be set to run very fast, all the time on all processing cores,
and it would be easier to disable / kill if it was asked to go to a single core
and run at a very low priority. The process priority class is a number, and the
boost value + thread value + OS settings determines the next priority value
used when scheduling the process. The affinity number is a bitmask of which
processors may be used (1 sets it to the first core). This is great for buggy
applications that consume so much CPU resources they stop responding to user
input, and for nudging malware to a state it can be removed. The demonstration
code has an option to attempt to set these things before attempting to kill the
process. A malicious application may still get around this by always setting
it’s priority and affinity in a critical non-sleeping thread loop.
System Critical (undocumented)
The OS keeps track of which processes are “critical” and
which ones are not, killing a “critical” process may either be impossible or
“blue screen” the PC. To make the process non-critical, there are two techniques:
NtSetInformationProcess, and RtlSetProcessIsCritical. Both are ntDLL.dll calls
that are undocumented / unsupported. There is some information out there but
not much. The demonstration code attempts to use NtSetInformationProcess to
remove the critical flag of an application.
This is a call that kills a thread in an unsafe manner. By
killing all threads of a process the process will exit once all pending IO
complete. Because the threads die at a very low unclean level, using this call
is a last resort. In the authors experience it is a bad, very very very bad idea
to use this call. It has some unpredictable affects. The process may enter such
an unstable state that the OS cannot schedule the process to run but also be
unable to close it. It can cause pending I/O to behave erratic, and it can also
“blue screen” the PC. It was in a DLL the author was forced to debug that
killed runaway USB driver reads, and occasionally crashed / locked up the PC,
became unstoppable, and blue screened. After rebooting, the PC was fine.
With disk encryption, root kits, registry modification,
viruses in disk forks, altering administrator’s privileges after taking
control, etc., sometimes the choice is to use this call, or not use the PC for
a few months till an anti-virus / anti-malware vendor provides a solution.
That is the only reason why the call was provided in the
demo and the only case the author can see the call as reasonable.
SW Architecture of the Demonstration Application
The software takes the approach of a scatter gun aimed at a
process or processes. Often what doesn’t work the first time may work after a
different technique has been tried and the OS has attempted to reschedule the
process. Some bad processes monitor each other and might only be stopped after
other processes have been killed in short order. The software runs in a loop
making several attempts at each process per iteration. Certain key things were done.
Every major call is wrapped, most of the calls that affect a
process or thread can throw exceptions and the application goal is to keep
moving, and try a different technique.
Every technique is tried but the starting point in the order
is varied per iteration, this gives each technique a fresh start at a fresh
list of processes.
By process name or
module full name
Some processes have a unique name, others may happen to have
the same name as a needed process. Some processes have paths that can be typed
in, others may not (resource paths, very long paths, paths with strange
characters). The application can be run to handle either case.
This is a simple demonstration application, the UI is
simplistic but functional. It is sufficient but by no means artistic nor
provide all the finesse needed for all theoretical situations. It is likely
that if more functionality is needed other techniques or specialized code
involving the registry, code injection,
etc. is also needed to deal with a specific malware threat or a highly