Click here to Skip to main content
Licence CPOL
First Posted 1 Jun 2009
Views 31,784
Downloads 796
Bookmarked 97 times

Fuzzy Search

By | 2 Jun 2009 | Article
A simple implementation of the fuzzy string search.

Introduction

This article describes a simple implementation of the fuzzy (string) search. It can be used for approximate string matching (for more information, see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fuzzy_string_searching).

Other algorithms for approximate string searching exist (e.g., Soundex), but those aren't as easy to implement. The algorithm in this article is easy to implement, and can be used for tasks where approximate string searching is used in an easy way.

A List<string> is used for searching, and therefore it's quite easy to search a database.

Background

The algorithm used the Levenshtein-distance for determining how exact a string from a word list matches the word to be found. Information about the Levenshtein-distance can be found at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Levenshtein_distance.

Using the code

The following example will show how simply the class can be used.

static void Main(string[] args)
{
    string word = "Code Project";
    List<string> wordList = new List<string>
    {
        "Code Project",
        "Code project",
        "codeproject",
        "Code Projekt",
        "Kode Project",
        "Other Project"
    };

    List<string> foundWords = FuzzySearch.Search(
        word,
        wordList,
        0.70);

    foundWords.ForEach(i => Console.WriteLine(i));
    Console.ReadKey();
}

Output:

Code Project
Code project
codeproject
Code Projekt
Kode Project

Implementation

A basic approach is shown. Instead of the Levenshtein-distance, a more optimized algorithm could be used - but here, a quite simple implementation is given for clarity reasons.

Levenshtein-distance

For computing the Levenshtein-distance, I use the following algorithm:

public static int LevenshteinDistance(string src, string dest)
{
    int[,] d = new int[src.Length + 1, dest.Length + 1];
    int i, j, cost;
    char[] str1 = src.ToCharArray();
    char[] str2 = dest.ToCharArray();

    for (i = 0; i <= str1.Length; i++)
    {
        d[i, 0] = i;
    }
    for (j = 0; j <= str2.Length; j++)
    {
        d[0, j] = j;
    }
    for (i = 1; i <= str1.Length; i++)
    {
        for (j = 1; j <= str2.Length; j++)
        {

            if (str1[i - 1] == str2[j - 1])
                cost = 0;
            else
                cost = 1;

            d[i, j] =
                Math.Min(
                    d[i - 1, j] + 1,              // Deletion
                    Math.Min(
                        d[i, j - 1] + 1,          // Insertion
                        d[i - 1, j - 1] + cost)); // Substitution

            if ((i > 1) && (j > 1) && (str1[i - 1] == 
                str2[j - 2]) && (str1[i - 2] == str2[j - 1]))
            {
                d[i, j] = Math.Min(d[i, j], d[i - 2, j - 2] + cost);
            }
        }
    }

    return d[str1.Length, str2.Length];
}

The Searching

In the search process, for each word in the wordlist, the Levenshtein-distance is computed, and with this distance, a score. This score represents how good the strings match. The input argument fuzzyness determines how much the strings can differ.

public static List<string> Search(
    string word,
    List<string> wordList,
    double fuzzyness)
{
    List<string> foundWords = new List<string>();

    foreach (string s in wordList)
    {
        // Calculate the Levenshtein-distance:
        int levenshteinDistance =
            LevenshteinDistance(word, s);

        // Length of the longer string:
        int length = Math.Max(word.Length, s.Length);

        // Calculate the score:
        double score = 1.0 - (double)levenshteinDistance / length;

        // Match?
        if (score > fuzzyness)
            foundWords.Add(s);
    }
    return foundWords;
}

LINQ-variant

This piece of code could be written in LINQ too.

public static List<string> Search(
    string word,
    List<string> wordList,
    double fuzzyness)
{
    // Tests have prove that the !LINQ-variant is about 3 times
    // faster!
    List<string> foundWords =
        (
            from s in wordList
            let levenshteinDistance = LevenshteinDistance(word, s)
            let length = Math.Max(s.Length, word.Length)
            let score = 1.0 - (double)levenshteinDistance / length
            where score > fuzzyness
            select s
        ).ToList();

    return foundWords;
}

History

  • 2009 June 1st: Initial release.

License

This article, along with any associated source code and files, is licensed under The Code Project Open License (CPOL)

About the Author

Günther M. FOIDL

Software Developer (Senior)
Foidl Günther
Austria Austria

Member

Engineer in combustion engine development.
Programming languages: C#, FORTRAN 95, Matlab
 
FIS-overall worldcup winner in Speedski (Downhill) 2008/09 and 2009/10.

Sign Up to vote   Poor Excellent
Add a reason or comment to your vote: x
Votes of 3 or less require a comment

Comments and Discussions

 
You must Sign In to use this message board. (secure sign-in)
 
Search this forum  
 FAQ
    Noise  Layout  Per page   
  Refresh
GeneralMy vote of 5 PinmemberPetr Abdulin19:36 18 Apr '12  
GeneralMy vote of 5 PinmemberArlen Navasartian8:26 9 Apr '12  
GeneralMy vote of 5 Pinmembermanoj kumar choubey21:32 26 Feb '12  
GeneralWorks Great ! Pinmemberdamon8819:27 10 Dec '09  
GeneralRe: Works Great ! PinmemberGünther M. FOIDL13:33 29 Dec '09  
GeneralAbout dictionary PinmemberWin32nipuh21:54 21 Oct '09  
GeneralRe: About dictionary PinmemberGünther M. FOIDL10:55 22 Oct '09  
Generalgreat explanation PinmemberWin32nipuh20:29 8 Jun '09  
GeneralRe: great explanation PinmemberGünther M. FOIDL14:31 9 Jun '09  
GeneralRe: great explanation Pinmembercoduresearch7:45 2 Sep '09  
GeneralRe: great explanation PinmemberGünther M. FOIDL6:22 10 Sep '09  
GeneralRe: great explanation PinmemberNicolas Dorier8:28 21 Oct '09  
GeneralSearching large text Pinmemberdaniel.zolnjan5:56 4 Jun '09  
GeneralRe: Searching large text PinmemberGünther M. FOIDL9:25 4 Jun '09  
GeneralI would also have used extension methods to make my code more readable PinmemberMoshe Plotkin14:06 1 Jun '09  
GeneralRe: I would also have used extension methods to make my code more readable PinmemberGünther M. FOIDL21:46 1 Jun '09  
GeneralLinq does not seam to be slower [modified] PinmemberMoshe Plotkin13:55 1 Jun '09  
GeneralRe: Linq does not seam to be slower PinmemberGünther M. FOIDL21:44 1 Jun '09  
GeneralRe: Linq does not seam to be slower PinmemberMoshe Plotkin2:15 2 Jun '09  
GeneralRe: Linq does not seam to be slower PinmemberGünther M. FOIDL3:14 2 Jun '09  
GeneralRe: Linq does not seam to be slower Pinmemberriskka2:28 10 Jun '09  
Questionmore optimized algorithm? PinmemberUnruled Boy3:11 1 Jun '09  
AnswerRe: more optimized algorithm? PinmemberGünther M. FOIDL3:22 1 Jun '09  
GeneralRe: more optimized algorithm? Pinmembergstolarov12:18 10 Jun '09  

General General    News News    Suggestion Suggestion    Question Question    Bug Bug    Answer Answer    Joke Joke    Rant Rant    Admin Admin   

Use Ctrl+Left/Right to switch messages, Ctrl+Up/Down to switch threads, Ctrl+Shift+Left/Right to switch pages.

Permalink | Advertise | Privacy | Mobile
Web03 | 2.5.120517.1 | Last Updated 2 Jun 2009
Article Copyright 2009 by Günther M. FOIDL
Everything else Copyright © CodeProject, 1999-2012
Terms of Use
Layout: fixed | fluid