Click here to Skip to main content
Licence CPOL
First Posted 9 Jun 2009
Views 57,765
Bookmarked 86 times

AH, Ah, ah, ah…Staying Alive…Staying Alive

By Steve Wellens | 10 Jun 2009 | Technical Blog
Sometimes you want your web page to 'stay alive'. That is, if a user is filling out a complicated form, you do not want the session to time out before they are finished. The user could get very angry and rightfully so: You might even get yelled at!
1 vote, 2.8%
1

2

3
3 votes, 8.3%
4
32 votes, 88.9%
5
4.90/5 - 36 votes
1 removed
μ 4.84, σa 1.26 [?]

Sometimes you want your web page to 'stay alive'. That is, if a user is filling out a complicated form, you do not want the session to time out before they are finished. The user could get very angry and rightfully so: You might even get yelled at!

It's not simply a matter of increasing the session timeout to a very large value. If you do that, the sessions would be left active in the server memory for hours—long after the visitors have left the site. Increasing the session timeout IS a solution… but not necessarily a good solution.

The goal is that the session should stay active as long as the web page is open on the client machine… even if there are no post backs to reset the session timer. When the web page is closed, the session should time out normally.

I implemented a solution for this: The client will "ping" the server at intervals of less than the session timeout which will reset the session timer. This is known as the Heartbeat design pattern (I couldn't find a decent site/page to link to).

Miscellaneous Setup Stuff

For testing purposes, I set the Session Timeout to two minutes in web.config:

<system.web>
  <sessionState timeout="2">
  </sessionState>
 </system.web>

To trace what is happening, I used a utility function called ODS (it's in a class called MiscUtilities):

// ---- ODS (Output Debug String) ----------------------
public static void ODS(string Msg)
{
    String Out = String.Format("{0}  {1}", DateTime.Now.ToString("hh:mm:ss.ff"), Msg);
    System.Diagnostics.Debug.WriteLine(Out);
}

To watch the Session State events, I added debugging strings to the global.asax file:

<%@ Application Language="C#" %>
<script RunAt="server">
      
    void Application_Start(object sender, EventArgs e)
    {
        MiscUtilities.ODS("****ApplicationStart");
    }
    void Session_Start(object sender, EventArgs e)
    {
        MiscUtilities.ODS("Session_Start");
    }
    void Session_End(object sender, EventArgs e)
    {
        MiscUtilities.ODS("Session_End");
    } 

Here are the details: We need a method at the server for the client to call. We use a WebMethod.

  1. There must be a ScriptManager on the page.
  2. The ScriptManager must have EnablePageMethods set to true.
  3. The WebMethod must be public and static.
  4. The WebMethod must have the EnableSession attribute set to true.
<asp:ScriptManager ID="ScriptManager1" runat="server" 
    EnablePageMethods="true">
</asp:ScriptManager>

public partial class _Default : System.Web.UI.Page
{
    [WebMethod(EnableSession=true ) ]
    public static void PokePage()
    {
        // called by client to refresh session
        MiscUtilities.ODS("Server: I am poked");       
    }

We need JavaScript at the client to call the server function at fixed intervals:

<script type="text/javascript">
 
    var HeartBeatTimer;
 
    function StartHeartBeat()
    {
        // pulse every 10 seconds
        if (HeartBeatTimer == null)
            HeartBeatTimer = setInterval("HeartBeat()", 1000 * 10);
    }
 
    function HeartBeat()
    {
        // note: ScriptManger must have: EnablePageMethods="true"
        Sys.Debug.trace("Client: Poke Server");
        PageMethods.PokePage();
    }

<body id="MyBody"  onload="StartHeartBeat();">

Here is what the output looks like without the heartbeat:

10:22:43.03 ****ApplicationStart 
10:22:45.13 Session_Start 
10:25:00.00 Session_End 

Here is the output with the heartbeat:

 
10:26:06.10  ****ApplicationStart
10:26:08.05  Session_Start
Client: Poke Server
10:26:18.93  Server: I am poked
Client: Poke Server
10:26:28.95  Server: I am poked
Client: Poke Server
10:26:38.96  Server: I am poked
Client: Poke Server
10:26:48.98  Server: I am poked

    . . . (lines deleted)

Client: Poke Server
10:29:59.45  Server: I am poked
Client: Poke Server
10:30:09.47  Server: I am poked
Client: Poke Server
10:30:19.48  Server: I am poked

    . . . (lines deleted)

It looks like the session is staying alive while the client is idle: Excellent!

I hope someone finds this useful.

Steve Wellens

License

This article, along with any associated source code and files, is licensed under The Code Project Open License (CPOL)

About the Author

Steve Wellens


EndWell Software, Inc.
United States United States

Member
I am an independent contractor/consultant working in the Twin Cities area in Minnesota. I work in .Net, Asp.Net, C#, C++, XML, SQL, Windows Forms, HTML, CSS, etc., etc., etc.

Sign Up to vote   Poor Excellent
Add a reason or comment to your vote: x
Votes of 3 or less require a comment

Comments and Discussions

 
You must Sign In to use this message board. (secure sign-in)
 
Search this forum  
 FAQ
    Noise  Layout  Per page   
  Refresh
GeneralComparing your work to other implementations PinmemberOmar Gamil5:00 18 Jun '11  
GeneralRe: Comparing your work to other implementations PinassociateSteve Wellens5:34 18 Jun '11  
GeneralRe: Comparing your work to other implementations PinmemberOmar Gamil5:37 18 Jun '11  
GeneralMy vote of 5 PinmentorKeith Barrow13:22 29 May '11  
GeneralMy vote of 1 PinmemberJason Ti0:06 15 Dec '10  
GeneralSending ajax request is not a good solution PinmemberJason Ti0:04 15 Dec '10  
GeneralRe: Sending ajax request is not a good solution PinassociateSteve Wellens3:46 15 Dec '10  
GeneralRe: Sending ajax request is not a good solution PinmemberJason Ti23:18 20 Dec '10  
GeneralRe: Sending ajax request is not a good solution PinPopularassociateSteve Wellens4:42 21 Dec '10  
GeneralRe: Sending ajax request is not a good solution PinmemberJason Ti3:06 5 Jan '11  
GeneralRe: Sending ajax request is not a good solution [modified] PinassociateSteve Wellens4:14 5 Jan '11  
GeneralRe: Sending ajax request is not a good solution PinmemberJason Ti3:16 7 Jan '11  
GeneralRe: Sending ajax request is not a good solution PinassociateSteve Wellens4:09 7 Jan '11  
GeneralGood stuff Pinmemberxoulrage21:42 7 Dec '09  
GeneralThanks PinmemberPak51412:56 27 Nov '09  
GeneralAuthenication PinmemberMr President8:46 11 Aug '09  
GeneralNice trick...You could also use... PinmemberMember 32316997:15 5 Aug '09  
GeneralSource code Pinmemberdazology5:54 5 Aug '09  
GeneralRe: Source code PinassociateSteve Wellens6:48 5 Aug '09  
GeneralSimply Superb Pinmemberjaneshh0:25 4 Aug '09  
GeneralRe: Simply Superb Pinmemberdazology5:53 5 Aug '09  
QuestionFull source Please !! [modified] Pinmembertolpromobil23:57 3 Aug '09  
GeneralTerrific! Thank You! Thank You! Thank You! PinmemberRon Kunce7:15 3 Aug '09  
QuestionHow about this! Pinmemberazamsharp2:42 3 Aug '09  
AnswerRe: How about this! PinassociateSteve Wellens4:24 3 Aug '09  

General General    News News    Suggestion Suggestion    Question Question    Bug Bug    Answer Answer    Joke Joke    Rant Rant    Admin Admin   

Use Ctrl+Left/Right to switch messages, Ctrl+Up/Down to switch threads, Ctrl+Shift+Left/Right to switch pages.

Permalink | Advertise | Privacy | Mobile
Web02 | 2.5.120209.1 | Last Updated 10 Jun 2009
Article Copyright 2009 by Steve Wellens
Everything else Copyright © CodeProject, 1999-2012
Terms of Use
Layout: fixed | fluid