 |
|
 |
Some people are way too keen to throw unwarranted critisms around
A BitMap button is never to set the whole world on fire - but this certainly warmed up my day a bit. It was exactly what I was looking for. A small class that does one job and it does it VERY WELL
Many thanks to Hamzadayi
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
Well done! This control works really well and despite earlier criticism, the code does not require or justify an 'article' - just a few minutes thought from the potential user. I for one would not like to have missed out on this nice piece of code simply because it wasn't backed up with a page or two of unnecessary text.
Good work!
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
I like you buttot, but I wonder how many color can be displayed, plz, 256 color or more then 16bit colors?
Thank you
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
Seeing the older comments and the way it has been done, made me astonished.
Okay, the guy does not speak English at the best (according to what he wrote) but this is not the case.
The code works fine and pretty understandable therefore no claims should be made, I think. He saved me approximately two hours and thanks for that.
I just had to add images to an okay and a cancel button. It is true that CButtonST is more sophisticated and documentation is better (which is really required as it is much more complex). But why someone would shot the goose with bomb?
This is my opinion.
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
Well It's true that it could be explained but hey, it's a fine piece of work to accomplish its purposes, aind it's quite easy to use, so maybe an explanation isn't even needed. Don't be so hard and read a bit. As someone said, C++ is an ISO language, you may learn a lot reading it
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
At least this poor guy is contributing SOMETHING. I'm sure more than a few of us pilfer from this site with reckless abandon, and never stop to contribute anything.
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
As Dirty Harry says, a man needs to know his limitations. If someone can't write something useful, how is it better that they clutter the site with something NOT useful, instead of bowing out ? I see mainly contstructive comments here, and I concur. An article does not mean a lump of source and a download, it means an explanation of what the code does/how it does it/why that is useful to me.
Christian
NO MATTER HOW MUCH BIG IS THE WORD SIZE ,THE DATA MUCT BE TRANSPORTED INTO THE CPU. - Vinod Sharma
Anonymous wrote:
OK. I read a c++ book. Or...a bit of it anyway. I'm sick of that evil looking console window.
I think you are a good candidate for Visual Basic. - Nemanja Trifunovic
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
This goes out to the people nagging... no need to, learn to code and please, please... learn to read c++.
It's an ISO language, remember? Knowing what you read makes articles so... unneeded.
Love this thing! Thanks!
Intelligence is the result of an effort you're not able to make...
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
yes ur are right c++ is amazing language. and code project articles are very helpfull to learn C++ and much more.
u can use my projects
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
sen kim oluyorsun da...(!!!!!!!!!!!!!)...you are the laziest!!!
Gerizekalı..mal...sushi misin ne boksun...
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
This work lacks body, substance and purpose.
What is it that you're trying to share with the community? You have not written anything that would describe your contribution.
Except for some code that AppWizard would automatically generate, you have not explained nor offered anything novel, beneficial and worthy of attention.
Foremostly, every article should have something new to offer (no matter how small it is, otherwise it's a duplication). Secondly (and normally), it would have words and sentences to highlight and describe the ideas representing the main features of the article. Then if applicable, it should present code samples to further explain and support what the article is about. These are just some of the starting points behind writing an article, with much details left to be filled in.
You skipped out on a lot of requirements here.
It is still not too late for you to rewrite this article over and do a much better job the second time around.
William
Fortes in fide et opere!
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
stfu for gods sake.
Since you are so elite, where are your articles? No nevermind...if your articles were so good, then you shouldn't have to tell me because they would be so POPULAR!!
get over yourself.
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
Yeah. You would've loved for me to say how great and wonderful, and genius the article is, when in truth it is none of those things.
When you write a great, wonderful and genius article, then I will say those things.
Show me where the requirement of CodeProject is that someone must first write an article in order to comment on one. If you can produce such a requirement by CodeProject, I will start writing an article within the hour.
I have gotten over myself years ago, enough to know when someone is saying something from which I can improve myself, I walk away feeling I have just been given a challenge. You obviously haven't walked that path yet.
William
Fortes in fide et opere!
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
When I write one? I would never write one...I am not the one going around running my mouth off on how someone's tutorial sucks. I have seen so many people like you on the internet ...you only say crap like that to get a response...just look how quick you responded..its like you were waiting for it.
I am not the only one who saw your a**holeness. Look at the other posts about you running your mouth off. Without even reading the rest of your post, there was this little voice in my head saying "oh god here we go again"..and then about 5 seconds later STFU came to mind. I just call it like I see it.
I was responding to your negative comments in the article, not external assumptions of your character. If you are not like that..then cool, but there is NO way you can know what paths I have walked in life.
Stop crying like a little girl and do something to help..
btw, you dont happen to be a liberal by chance? lol
James (Jake) Torset
www.suppressivefire.net/jake
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
No, I wasn't waiting on your message to make a reply. There's NOTHING liberating about your message to be waiting for. It just so happens that I check for messages two or three time a day and yours happened to be there. (I don't even know why I refer to it as "message". It's more like trash you spurt out.)
You obviously couldn't find anything from CodeProject that states a person must first write an article before posting a comment about someone else's. So why don't you take your own advice and STFU!!!
I DON'T normally reply to garbage, and the exception I made in your case has proven to me that my time is more valuable than dealing with trash.
William
Fortes in fide et opere!
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
 |
|
 |
Where's the article? I see some code...but I'm still looking for that article.
any idiot
can write haiku you just stop
at seventeenth syl
-ThinkGeek Fortunes
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
Please!
Write an article next time for god sake!
Rickard Andersson@Suza Computing
C# and C++ programmer from SWEDEN!
UIN: 50302279
E-Mail: nikado@pc.nu
Speciality: I love C#, ASP.NET and C++!
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
Before everyone rates this a 1 and complains how poor the article is, please write a description about the purpose of your article and how to use your code.
John
|
|
|
|
 |