Click here to Skip to main content
15,880,972 members
Articles / Database Development / SQL Server / SQL Server 2008

Very fast test data generation using exponential INSERT

Rate me:
Please Sign up or sign in to vote.
3.50/5 (2 votes)
28 Aug 2009CPOL1 min read 28.8K   11   9
Instead of using incremental INSERT to generate test data, this method effectly copies the existing data multiple times.

Introduction

This article (my first) will describe an algorithm that enables a large amount of data to be generated very quickly using a SQL query. The test data can be static or incremental, such as “Item Name” and “Item ID”, respectively, as shown below:

tableSample.png

Background

One of the tasks I did in a project involves generating a testing table with 103,680,000 records. The conventional method of data generation would take a month; hence, a fast method of data insertion was required. The new method took only 5 hours.

Using the code

Conventional method – Sequential INSERT

The conventional way of generating a list of numbers from 0…100000 would be using a loop and an INSERT statement as follows:

SQL
CREATE TABLE #tempTable([Item ID] [bigint], [Item Name] nvarchar(30))
DECLARE @counter int
SET @counter = 1
WHILE (@counter < 100000)
BEGIN
        INSERT INTO #tempTable VALUES (@counter, 'Hammer')
        SET @counter = @counter + 1
END
SELECT * FROM #tempTable
DROP TABLE #tempTable

Let's call this method of data generation “Sequential INSERT”.

New method – Exponential INSERT

The new method effectively makes a copy of the existing data and appends it as new data, and does so repeatedly until the desired amount of data is generated.

Image 2

Here is the code for the exponential INSERT:

SQL
CREATE TABLE #tempTable([Item ID] [bigint], [Item Name] nvarchar(30))
INSERT INTO #tempTable VALUES (1, 'Hammer')
WHILE((SELECT COUNT(*) FROM #tempTable) < 100000)
BEGIN
    INSERT INTO #tempTable ([Item ID], [Item Name])
        (SELECT [Item ID] + (SELECT COUNT(*) FROM #tempTable), 
                                 'Hammer' FROM #tempTable)
END
SELECT * FROM #tempTable
DROP TABLE #tempTable

Points of interest

The condition for the WHILE..LOOP is (SELECT COUNT(*)). This condition statement takes a long time to be evaluated. A faster method would be to calculate how many iterations are needed to generate the desired number of records, i.e., 100,000 records in this case, which is 2^17=131,072, so we can rewrite the code to stop after the 17th iteration.

It took 4 seconds to execute the number count from 1 to 100,0000; the exponential method took two seconds with the code below:

SQL
CREATE TABLE #tempTable([Item ID] [bigint], [Item Name] nvarchar(30))
INSERT INTO #tempTable VALUES (1, 'Hammer')
DECLARE @counter int
SET @counter = 1
WHILE(@counter <= 17)
BEGIN
    INSERT INTO #tempTable ([Item ID], [Item Name])
        (SELECT [Item ID] + (SELECT COUNT(*) FROM #tempTable), 
                           'Hammer' FROM #tempTable)
    SET @counter = @counter + 1
END
SELECT * FROM #tempTable
DROP TABLE #tempTable

Also, not only can you use this to increment a number field, but it can be applied to datetime fields as well.

History

  • This is v1.0.

License

This article, along with any associated source code and files, is licensed under The Code Project Open License (CPOL)


Written By
United Kingdom United Kingdom
This member has not yet provided a Biography. Assume it's interesting and varied, and probably something to do with programming.

Comments and Discussions

 
GeneralMy vote of 2 Pin
Aborq31-Aug-09 21:50
Aborq31-Aug-09 21:50 
GeneralRe: My vote of 2 Pin
weilidai20011-Sep-09 0:03
weilidai20011-Sep-09 0:03 
GeneralRe: My vote of 2 Pin
Aborq3-Sep-09 3:50
Aborq3-Sep-09 3:50 
QuestionWhy go row-by-row? Pin
Aborq31-Aug-09 21:37
Aborq31-Aug-09 21:37 
AnswerRe: Why go row-by-row? Pin
weilidai20011-Sep-09 0:04
weilidai20011-Sep-09 0:04 
QuestionCould a variation be used to speed up creation of non-trivial records? Pin
supercat926-Aug-09 12:10
supercat926-Aug-09 12:10 
AnswerRe: Could a variation be used to speed up creation of non-trivial records? Pin
weilidai200126-Aug-09 13:12
weilidai200126-Aug-09 13:12 
GeneralRe: Could a variation be used to speed up creation of non-trivial records? Pin
supercat927-Aug-09 5:23
supercat927-Aug-09 5:23 
GeneralRe: Could a variation be used to speed up creation of non-trivial records? Pin
Md. Marufuzzaman27-Aug-09 10:26
professionalMd. Marufuzzaman27-Aug-09 10:26 

General General    News News    Suggestion Suggestion    Question Question    Bug Bug    Answer Answer    Joke Joke    Praise Praise    Rant Rant    Admin Admin   

Use Ctrl+Left/Right to switch messages, Ctrl+Up/Down to switch threads, Ctrl+Shift+Left/Right to switch pages.