Click here to Skip to main content
Click here to Skip to main content
Technical Blog

Tagged as

Another Alternative to Lambda Move Capture

, 31 Dec 2012 CPOL
Rate this:
Please Sign up or sign in to vote.
This post discusses another alternative to lambda move capture.

Introduction

Today, the post on isocpp.org called Learn How to Capture By Move caught my attention. I found the post informative and thought provoking, and you should go and read it before reading the rest of this post.

The problem is how do we lambda capture a large object we want to avoid copying.

The motivating example is below:

 function<void()> CreateLambda()  
 {  
   vector<HugeObject> hugeObj;  
   // ...preparation of hugeObj...  
   auto toReturn = [hugeObj] { ...operate on hugeObj... };  
   return toReturn;  
 } 

The solution proposed is a template class move_on_copy that is used like this:

 auto moved = make_move_on_copy(move(hugeObj));  
 auto toExec = [moved] { ...operate on moved.value... };  

However, there are problems with this approach, mainly in safety. The move_on_copy acts as auto_ptr and silently performs moves instead of copies (by design).

I present here a different take on the problem which accomplishes much of the above safely, however, with a little more verbosity in exchange for more clarity and safety.

First, let me tell you how you would use the final product:

 HugeObject hugeObj;  
 // ...preparation of hugeObj...  
 auto f = create_move_lambda(std::move(hugeObj),[](moved_value<HugeObject> hugeObj){  
   // manipulate huge object  
   // In this example just output it  
   std::cout << hugeObj.value() << std::endl;  
 });  

The point of interest is the create_move_lambda. The first argument is r-value reference of the object we want to move generated with std::move.

The second argument is the lambda.

Instead of having the moved object in the capture list, we take an extra argument of moved_value which looks like this:

 template<class T>
 using moved_value = std::reference_wrapper<T>;

You can access the moved object using moved_value.get().

Currently, you can have any number or parameters or any return type for your lambda, but only 1 move capture. That restriction, I am sure could eventually be removed.

So how does this work? Instead of attempting to change the capture type or wrap the capture type, we instead create a function object which wraps the lambda, stores the moved object, and when called with a set of arguments, forwards to the lambda with the moved_value as the first parameter. Below is the implementation of move_lambda and create_move_lambda

template<class T,class F>
struct move_lambda{
private:
 T val;
 F f_;
public:
 move_lambda(T&& v, F f):val(std::move(v)),f_(f){};
 move_lambda(move_lambda&& other) = default;
 move_lambda& operator=(move_lambda&& other) = default;

 template<class... Args>
 auto operator()(Args&& ...args) -> decltype(this->f_
(moved_value<t>(this->val),std::forward%lt;Args>(args)...))
 {
    moved_value<T> mv(val);
    return f_(mv,std::forward<Args>(args)...);
 }

 move_lambda() = delete;
 move_lambda(const move_lambda&) = delete;
 move_lambda& operator=(const move_lambda&) = delete;
};

 template<class T,class F>
 move_lambda<T,F>create_move_lambda(T&& t, F f){
    return move_lambda<T,F>(std::move(t),f);
 }

So now, we have move_lambda returned from create_move_lambda that can be used just like a lambda with move capture. In addition, copy construction and assignment are disabled so you cannot inadvertently copy the lambda. However, move construction and move assignment are enabled so you can move the lambda. Further examples are below:

 // A movable only type, not copyable
 TestMove m;
 m.k = 5;

 // A movable only type, not copyable
 TestMove m2;
 m2.k = 6;

 // Create a lambda that takes 2 parameters and returns int
 auto lambda = create_move_lambda(std::move(m),[](moved_value<TestMove> m,int i,int)->int{
    std::cout << m.get().k << " " << i << std::endl;return 7;
 });

 // Create a lambda that takes 0 parameters and returns void
 auto lambda2 = create_move_lambda(std::move(m2),[](moved_value<TestMove> m){
    std::cout << m.get().k << std::endl;
 });

 std::cout <<  lambda(1,2) << std::endl;

 lambda2();

 // Compiler error if you try to copy
 //auto lambda4 = lambda;

 // Able to move
 auto lambda3 = std::move(lambda2);
 lambda3();

However, there is still one more problem left in using move_lambda. You cannot store move_lambda in a std::function because move_lambda does not have a copy constructor. So how do we write the original function we wanted. Well we write a movable_function which is presented below:

// Unfortunately, std::function does not seem to support move-only callables
// See § 20.8.11.2.1 point 7 where it requires F be CopyConstructible 
// From draft at http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2011/n3242.pdf
// Here is our movable replacement for std::function
template< class ReturnType, class... ParamTypes>
struct movable_function_base{
 virtual ReturnType callFunc(ParamTypes&&... p) = 0;
};

template<class F, class ReturnType, class... ParamTypes>
struct movable_function_imp:public movable_function_base<ReturnType,ParamTypes...>{
 F f_;
 virtual ReturnType callFunc(ParamTypes&&... p){
    return f_(std::forward<ParamTypes>(p)...);
 }
 explicit movable_function_imp(F&& f):f_(std::move(f)){};

 movable_function_imp() = delete;
 movable_function_imp(const movable_function_imp&) = delete;
 movable_function_imp& operator=(const movable_function_imp&) = delete;
};

template<class FuncType>
struct movable_function{};

template<class ReturnType, class... ParamTypes>
struct movable_function<ReturnType(ParamTypes...)>{
 std::unique_ptr<movable_function_base<ReturnType,ParamTypes...>> ptr_;

 template<class F>
 explicit movable_function(F&& f):
 ptr_(new movable_function_imp<F,ReturnType,ParamTypes...>(std::move(f))){}
 movable_function(movable_function&& other) = default;
 movable_function& operator=(movable_function&& other) = default;

 template<class... Args>
 auto operator()(Args&& ...args) -> ReturnType
 {
    return ptr_->callFunc(std::forward<Args>(args)...);
 }
 movable_function() = delete;
 movable_function(const movable_function&) = delete;
 movable_function& operator=(const movable_function&) = delete;

};

Based on the above, we can write our CreateLambda() as:

movable_function<void()> CreateLambda()
{
 // Pretend our TestMove is a HugeObject that we do not want to copy
 typedef TestMove HugeObject;

 // Manipulate our "HugeObject"
 HugeObject hugeObj;
 hugeObj.k = 9;

 auto f = create_move_lambda(std::move(hugeObj),[]
 (moved_value<HugeObject> hugeObj){// manipulate huge object
    std::cout << hugeObj.get().k << std::endl;
 });

 movable_function<void()> toReturn(std::move(f));

 return toReturn;
}

And use it like this:

 // Moved out of function  
 auto lambda4 = CreateLambda();  
 lambda4();  

Alternatives and Extensions 

A simple alternative would be instead of using moved_value as the first parameter, take a reference. This would make the lambda look like this:

 // You can take a reference instead of a moved_value if you want 
 auto lambda5 = create_move_lambda(std::move(m3),[](TestMove& m){ 
    std::cout << m.k << std::endl; 
 }); 

This actually works due to moved_value being a template alias for reference_type. This is a little bit shorter than the previous code, but you cannot tell what are your real lambda parameters and what are the parameters used to simulate move capture.

An extension to this code would be allowing for multiple captured variables. Currently, the code only allows for 1 move captured variable.

Thanks for taking the time to read this.

You can find a compilable example at https://gist.github.com/4208898.
The code above requires a fairly compliant C++11 compiler and has been tested with GCC 4.7.2 (Windows nuwen.net distribution).

An older version of the code that compiles with ideone and with VC++ 2012 November CTP is at http://ideone.com/OXYVyp.

Please leave comments and let me know what you think.

License

This article, along with any associated source code and files, is licensed under The Code Project Open License (CPOL)

Share

About the Author

John Bandela
Software Developer self employed
United States United States
I started programming in Basic in the 4th grade. In 8th grade, I convinced my parents to buy me Visual C++ 1.0. I discovered I really enjoyed C++, and have been programming in it since. I attended the University of Florida and majored in Computer Science graduating with honors with a 4.0 GPA. I then attending Medical School and obtained my Doctor of Medicine degree.
 
I have used my computer skills to help me in my medical practice. I also enjoy programming in C++ just for fun, trying to discover new ways of solving problems or applying C++ to new areas. My latest interest has been in creating a component system for C++ allowing components created with 1 compiler to be easily used by another compiler.

Comments and Discussions

 
-- There are no messages in this forum --
| Advertise | Privacy | Terms of Use | Mobile
Web01 | 2.8.1411019.1 | Last Updated 31 Dec 2012
Article Copyright 2012 by John Bandela
Everything else Copyright © CodeProject, 1999-2014
Layout: fixed | fluid