|
|
Comments and Discussions
|
|
 |

|
Using 6.6.7 - not able to see Edit > Other Task Attributes > Set Task Colour...
|
|
|
|

|
Have a look at the preferences > fonts and colours.
Is "colour task titles by assigned colours" enabled?
Jochen
|
|
|
|

|
nope.
I have fiddled with all settings under this menu but don't see - Edit > Other Task Attributes > Set Color
Warm Regards,
Manoj
|
|
|
|

|
I recently had a request for making tasks readonly[^], which would appear to be a fairly simple job (6.8).
And it's prompted in me another related idea: Task Ownership.
I haven't really thought it through yet, but if a task was 'owned' by someone then only they could edit it.
Effectively it would be read-only to everyone but the owner.
Let me know if this would be of interest to you.
ps. This would not be a mechanism to allow you to only check-out specific tasks, it would just be a way of controlling access to tasks.
modified 7 hrs ago.
|
|
|
|

|
Interesting. Are you thinking this would be driven by the "Allocated to" attribute?
|
|
|
|

|
zajchapp wrote: Are you thinking this would be driven by the "Allocated to" attribute? Possibly, though we would then need a means of associating a given user with a alloc-to name, which could correspond to the 'Created by' name in the preferences.
My initial thought however was to use the user's Windows ID since that is less easily changed. After all, there's not much point having ownership if people can easily spoof each other's identities.
Note: the read-only flag would have no such control and anyone could change this if they wanted to.
|
|
|
|

|
Hi Dan,
"read-only to everyone but the owner" is a good option to make sure that nobody can mess up your tasks or comments.
Suggestion:
One step further. It would be great if the owner could define one or two persons that are allowed to make changes, e.g. during his absence. Makes sense if we are looking at a shared tasklist and the owner is e.g. on holiday.
Just a thought.
Cheers,
Jochen
|
|
|
|

|
Pardon if I am being a bit thick but...
Is the 'owner' then initially the 'creator', and will 'owner' be a further attribute (only editable by the owner)? Or how will the task be associated with a person?
So are you also saying that anyone one would be able to go into the tasklist, but any tasks not owned by them would be 'read only'. They could however switch this 'read only' status off? An individual task, or all tasks.
The read only tasks would also need to be visually distinct from editable ones.
Having said all that, I think it would be a useful option for shared tasklists.
zajchapp
|
|
|
|

|
Get it Here.
New Features
- Task references/aliases (Ctrl+Shift+Drag, or Right-Click Drag. Will add support for 'Paste As Ref'.)
- Gantt Chart Plugin
- List support added to custom attribute icon type
- Support added for Google Drive, SkyDrive and DropBox (if these are installed)
- Start and Due dates now have their own droplists on the filter bar
- Support added to use Stickies for reminders.
- Support added to cut/paste between separate instances of TDL
|
|
|
|

|
Hi dan
thanks for the new release.
First issue: In Gantt View the column "Alloc to" can not be switched of.
Pierre
|
|
|
|

|
Pierre de la Verre wrote: In Gantt View the column "Alloc to" can not be switched of. Do you mean 'hidden'?
|
|
|
|

|
.dan.g. wrote: Do you mean 'hidden'?
Yes.
Pierre
|
|
|
|
|

|
DT996 wrote: Thank you so much!!! You're welcome.
What to call these 'things' however has been tricky because they are an abstract concept with no obvious connection to the physical world until you get down to a quantum level.
In a sense they are 'links', except that they don't _link_ to the original, they _are_ the original. Likewise for 'shortcuts'. And 'link' is already taken for files and URIs.
And they're not strictly 'references' either, except in the programming sense, which perhaps comes closest.
And to me, 'clone' implies an exact copy rather than the original itself.
So we're stuck with 'references' for now...
|
|
|
|

|
Reference works.
For what it is worth, I think of these as 'referred tasks', or 'additional task instance'.
The instance isn't exactly the same as the original visually, as it has a shortcut icon on it...
One other thing. Searching on title doesn't bring up the referred tasks. Is this intended?
zajchapp
|
|
|
|

|
Hello,
the filter is set to "Tasks Due by Today" the task is set to occur every one week on Mon, Tue, Wed, Thu and Fr. After completion a new task will be created.
As from 6.6.3 the new task is not filtered and is shown additionally within the task tree/list.
With 6.6.2 the task for today disappears after completion / is filtered correctly.
Can anybody confirm this behaviour?
Thanks!
Best regards,
Dominik
/edit: Issue came up with Version 6.6.3 not 6.6.4
|
|
|
|

|
Hi Dominic
Can you confirm if this is still an issue in 6.6.7?
|
|
|
|

|
Hi .dan.g.
yes, this issue still persists in 6.6.7
If i complete the recurring task due today it will be striked-through and the newly created Task for the following day will be shown additionally.
Best regards,
Dominik
/edit: Issue as from version 6.6.3 not 6.6.4
|
|
|
|

|
Dan,
I think adding wordwap to custom text columns would open up a lot of new uses for TDL.
I use to use Microsoft Access to develop custom databases, but it is so much easier to create a simple database with TDL.
However, when I add custom text columns to a simple database that I want create with TDL, the text columns can get too wide without wordwrap. This limits considerably what I can do with custom text field types of ToDoLists.
Have you given any thought to adding wordwrap to custom text columns? Would that be difficult to implement? Would you consider this feature for a future release?
Thanks,
Dave Thompson
|
|
|
|

|
DT996 wrote: I use to use Microsoft Access to develop custom databases, but it is so much easier to create a simple database with TDL. Take care, as this was not how I conceived TDL being used and performance may deteriorate when file sizes get large. Just a heads-up.
DT996 wrote: Have you given any thought to adding wordwrap to custom text columns? Would that be difficult to implement? Unfortunately there is no way to change the individual height of items in a Windows Tree Control. I would have to write a new Tree Control from scratch.
|
|
|
|

|
Dan,
Okay...thanks for your reply and all that you do for us.
Dave Thompson
|
|
|
|

|
Hi All,
I'm proposing a significant upgrade to the Calendar plugin in 6.8.
The most significant change will be to render the space between start and due dates as a continuous coloured bar, like in Outlook, with the facility to drag either the whole bar or either of its ends to changes its dates.
This facility will also be implemented similarly in the Gantt chart.
|
|
|
|

|
Personally, I don't currently use this feature much. However, I would if I could change dates by dragging.
I would probably only show the Due date however, as I use this as my 'action date'. As long as these single dates are draggable as well, I would be happy.
You already know I am keen to be able to drag in Gantt view.
zajchapp
|
|
|
|

|
zajchapp wrote: As long as these single dates are draggable as well They will.
zajchapp wrote: You already know I am keen to be able to drag in Gantt view. I certainly do!
|
|
|
|

|
Great news! Both these features (colored bar and drag-to-change) will significantly add more usability and visual perception to the plugins, looking forward to 6.8
|
|
|
|

|
Hi, Dan,
I've got 2 more suggestions over here:
1. making tasks easy to drag within the dates (assuming the task will keep the same properties).
2. making it possible to insert a new task for a certain date either way (via menu, right-clicking, shortcuts) like you can do in Outlook, for instance.
Cheers,
ALex
|
|
|
|

|
An amazing tool! Often thought of making one for myself, but was too lazy to complete it. Thank you for giving a ready made one!
|
|
|
|
|

|
Hi Dan,
Would it be possible to add an option in Listview to not show Referenced tasks. Otherwise you are essentially seeing the same task twice. I would also be happy with never showing them in this view...
Very useful in the other views mind you.
zajchapp
|
|
|
|

|
zajchapp wrote: I would also be happy with never showing them in this view... I agree. I've already filtered them out of the Calendar view for the same reason.
|
|
|
|

|
Great
|
|
|
|

|
Hi Dan, Currently, among all right-click menu items the closest to the pointer is the most useless one. I think it would be more convenient to have New Task item and New Subtask item at the bottom, replacing Cancel item. Would you consider removing Cancel from the right-click menu as unnecessary? Alternatively, it's possible to leave New Task/Subtask items at the top, provided the mouse pointer does not stay at the bottom upon right-clicking. One option is to position it over New Tasks item. I am not sure which is the easiest, but as of now the task of adding a new item via the right-click menu can be simplified.
|
|
|
|

|
andkostenko wrote: the most useless one. Please avoid phrases like this, as it doesn't make me inclined to read the rest of your post.
|
|
|
|

|
I think the relevant addition would be that of mentioning that the situation described in my previous communication can only be reproduced by right-clicking at some lower part of the screen. As to your reply, maybe you will find some time to read the title of this post at http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/9953/could-we-please-be-a-bit-nicer-to-new-users. If I were you, I would simply explain a new user what that "Cancel" item cancels and how to use it most usefully.
|
|
|
|

|
Thank you for your comments.
|
|
|
|

|
As with all popup menus in Windows, if it can open below the cursor without reaching the bottom of your monitor, then the popup menu will open downwards. So if you have ToDoList at the very top of your screen and you right-click on the top item in your tasklist, it will probably open downwards, and the New Task item would be immediately below your cursor.
However if there is not enough space for the menu to open downwards, it will open upwards and Cancel will be closest. Changing the order of the popup menu is not the solution here. Probably the main problem (if indeed there is one) is that the popup menu is pretty big, and maybe it could be trimmed.
I do agree that Cancel is not required though. Though I may have pointed this out slightly less bluntly
Cheers
[d3m0n]
Email (replace "***" with "key")
|
|
|
|

|
Thx for trying to see both sides mate, but after 10 years of having people project their expectations and disappointments of TDL onto me, I have to draw the line somewhere...
|
|
|
|

|
Dan,
when I create a custom attribute, type 'Number (fractional)', I have noticed that :
* If I populate '5' in the field, why the value is not transformed to '5,00' like for 'Cost' field for example ?
Kind regards
modified 4 days ago.
|
|
|
|
|

|
Hello Dan,
I have a remark about the Gantt.
each line of the gantt has an alternate color even if I uncheck the option 'alternante color'
Currently the Gantt is not very readable between the color of bars, the color of line and the color of week-ends...
In my opinion, even if there is alternate color for tasks, the gantt visualisation part should be without any alternate color. Or it should be an option...
Kind regards
|
|
|
|

|
laurentbosc wrote: each line of the gantt has an alternate color even if I uncheck the option 'alternante color' It works fine for me in 6.7.DR6.
|
|
|
|

|
Indeed, the gantt in 6.7 DR6 has great improvements, and the option 'Alternate color' is working.
But I would keep the alternate color in all views, including Gantt view.
But just for the gantt part (where gantt bars are displayed), I think it is more readable to never have alternate color.
Or perhaps a separate option ?: Even In case of alternate color checked, add the possibility to have no background color for the gantt part ?
I hope I'm clear...
|
|
|
|

|
Can you send me screenshots so that I can see why the alternate line colour is such a problem for you in the Gannt view?
|
|
|
|

|
It is especially in 'day' or 'week' view where :
- there is the week-ends in dark gray,
- The alternate color for lines
- the grid
- the bars
- the active task line highlighted
a little bit difficult to focus on the main items : the bars. According to me alternate color is not essential in this view, but it is just my opinion
kind reagards
|
|
|
|

|
Can you send me a screenshot pls?
|
|
|
|

|
Sorry, don't take this message in count, I've found the new version in one of the comments.
_________________________________________________________________________
Hi Dan,
Sorry to bother you, but of what Gantt view are you talking about? The latest version (6.7) doesn't have it enableb. Am I missing something? Should I wait for your next release?
Thanks in advance.
modified yesterday.
|
|
|
|

|
While I use Freeplane, I have also tried this with Freemind. The results are the same.
The values of the attributes are incorrect. For example I have checked Creation Date to be among the exported attributes. Yet when I open the mm file in either Freeplane or Freemind, the attribute does not appear. I have also tried exporting all attributes with the same result. All of the attributes are not exported and appear to be excluded even if they contain values. Allocated By has a value and is exported without a value as TaskAllocatedBy. However Allocated To also has a value yet does not show up in the export at all.
Furthermore, names of attributes appears to be inconsistent. I know about the display names, but the names in the task list differ from those in the selection of attributes listed in export (understandable because of the use of display names), but these also differ from the names that are exported.
Thank you.
Jon
|
|
|
|

|
Hi Jon
Can you send me a simple sample tasklist which comments regarding each and every missing attribute, and which attribute names are incorrect from your perspective?
Thx
|
|
|
|

|
Sure, but it may not be necessary. If my explanation is clear enough for you to follow, this occurs in the Introduction.tdl file you include with the installer package.
Please let me know if I am doing something wrong or if my expectations of how this should work are incorrect.
Jon
|
|
|
|

|
Member 10052396 wrote: If my explanation is clear enough for you to follow Thx Jon, but I would not have asked for the extra information if what you had given me was sufficient.
modified 3 days ago.
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
General News Suggestion Question Bug Answer Joke Rant Admin
|
A hierarchical task manager with native XML support for custom reporting.
| Type | Article |
| Licence | Eclipse |
| First Posted | 3 Nov 2003 |
| Views | 12,793,761 |
| Downloads | 224,998 |
| Bookmarked | 2,920 times |
|
|