Click here to Skip to main content
Click here to Skip to main content

Spart, a parser generator framework 100% C#

By , 22 Dec 2003
 

Sample image

Note: If you like this tool please remember to vote, as this will get other people interested and is more likely to help improve the final product
-- ToDoList organizer, Dan.G.

Introduction

The Spart library an object oriented recursive descent parser generator framework implemented in C#. In fact, it is a partial port of the excellent Spirit library, which is written in C++ and uses meta-programming.

The Spart framework enables a target grammar to be written exclusively in C#. An EBNF grammar can be closely match using C# code. In retrospect, conventional compiler-compilers or parser-generators have to perform an additional translation step from the source EBNF code to C or C++ code.

I have takened the liberty to use the structure (and some sentence) of the Spirit documentation. Along the article, some notes are added regarding some issues about the port to C#: Spirit-2-Spart Notes (SSN).

As always, this article presents an overview of the library. For deeper details, please refer to the NDoc documentation. The library also comes with a battery of NUnit tests.

Quick Start

Spart is designed to bring you parser capabilites quickly directly into your code. While it is not suited for creating parsers for entire language like C,C++, it is very effective for building micro-grammars in your code.

When you need to build a new parser, there are existing solution: a combination of ....Parse (like int.Parse) calls, or using regular expression (Regexp class) or a combination of both. However, these tools do not scale well when attempting to write more complex parsers: maintenance and readability become ackward.

So, as for Spirit, one of the main objective of Spart is to let you build easily grammar in C#. To fix this ideas, a few simple grammars illustrate Spart usage:

Trivial example #1:

Create a parser that will parse a digit:

Prims.Digit

(This is a trivial case, Char.IsDigit already does that). Prims is a static class, Digit is a property that create a new parser for digits. In fact, Prims is a helper class that creates primitive parsers for you and hides implementation details.

SSN: This parser is equivalent to num_p.

Trivial example #2:

Create a parser that will parse a sequence of two digits

Ops.Seq( Prims.Digit, Prims.Digit )

Here you see the familiar Prims.Digit parser enclosed in a Ops.Seq call. Like Prims, Ops is a static helper class that creates combine parsers for you. The Seq method creates a parser that is a sequence of two parsers (>> in Spirit):

Ops.Seq(a,b) <=> match a and b in sequence

Note: when we combine parsers, we end up with a "bigger" parser, But it's still a parser. Parsers can get bigger and bigger, nesting more and more, but whenever you glue two parsers together, you end up with one bigger parser. This is an important concept.

SSN: The operator >> does not accept arbitrary operands, they must be of integral type which restrict it's use.

Trivial Example #3

Create a parser that will accept an arbitrary number of digit. (Arbitrary means anything from zero to infinity).

Ops.Star(Prims.Digit)

This is like the regular expression Kleene Star.

SSN: * cannot be an unary operator in C#.

Less trivial example #4

Create a parser that parse a sequence of comma separated digits and record them in a collection (note this can easily be done using String.Split).

// spirit: num_p >> *( ch_p(',') >> num_p)
Ops.Seq( Prims.Digit, Ops.Start( Ops.Seq(Prims.Ch(','), Prims.Digit)))

Note that Prims.Ch('x') will math the character x. Prims.Ch(',') will match a comma. In this case, the Kleene star matches a more complex expression, namely

Ops.Seq(Prims.Ch(','), Prims.Digit)

which matches a sequence of comma and digit.

Note: the Ops.Sep(Prims.Ch(','),... expression can be simplified to Ops.Seq(',', ... to simplify notations.

Using the parser

Once we have built our parser, we want to use it. A parser can be used directly as is:

// string to parser
String s = "1,2,3,4";
// creating the parser as above
Parser p = Ops.Seq(...);
// creating a scanner of the string
StringScanner scan = new StringScanner(s);
// parsing the string through the scanner
ParserMatch m = p.Parse(s);

Notes:

  • Parser is an abstract base class for all parsers. It contains the Parse method that can be used to parse some input.
  • The parser does not work directly on string but rather on some modified stream (scanners). Therefore, it is possible to parse directly from files or stream. StringScanner implements the scanner interface and wraps the string s.
  • ParserMatch is the parser result (see below)

Now that we have parsed the text, the ParserMatch object can help answer questions like: was the match successful, what was the match value, etc... :

if (m.Success)
    Console.Write("successfull match!");

Semantic Actions

Our parser above is nothing but a recognizer, it does no take any actions. It answers "did our data match the grammar?" but it does not record anything. Remember that we wanted to record the digits into a collection. For example, whenever we parse a digit, we wish to store the parsed number after a successful match. We now wish to extract information from the parser. Semantic actions do this. Semantic actions may be attached to any point in the grammar specification. They through events and event handler.

The Parser class has an event, Act, that is called on a successful match. We need to add a event handler on the Prims.Digit parser that records the digit into a collection. First, we write an actor that will record the digits

// A digit recorder actor
public class MyActor
{
    ArrayList digits; // digits collection
    ...
    public void RecordDigit(Object sender, ActionEventArgs args)
    {
        // record the digit into the digits collection
        digits.Add( args.TypedValue );
    }
}

Then, we add a digit recorder handler to each digit parser:

MyActor a = new MyActor();

// digit parser
Parser d = Prims.Digit;
// register actor
d.Act += new ActionEventHandler( a.RecordDigit );

// create parser
Parser p = Ops.Seq( d, Ops.Start( Ops.Seq(',', d)));

This is the same parser as above but now, MyParser.RecordDigit is called on each successfull digit match and therefore, the collection is filled.

Basic concepts

Spart follows the concepts of Spirit. There are a few fundamental concepts that need to be understood well: 1) The Parser, 2) the Match, 3) The Scanner, and 4) Semantic Actions. These basic concepts interact with each other, and the functionalities of each interweave throughout the entire framework to make it one coherent whole.

I will go quickly over those concepts since they are very well explained in the Spirit documentation and I recommend you take a look there first.

The parser

Central to the framework is the parser. The parser does the actual work of recognizing a linear input stream of data read sequentially from start to end by the scanner. The parser attempts to match the input following a well-defined set of specifications in the form of grammar rules. The parser reports the success or failure to its client through a match object. When successful, the parser calls a client-supplied semantic action. Finally, the strategically-placed semantic action extracts structural information depending on the data passed to it by the parser and the heirarchical context of the parser it is attached to.

Parsers come in a lot of flavors and usually you don't need to write your own parser. Spart has a collection of built-in parsers that you can combine to create your grammars. The built-in parsers come in two (main) flavors:

Primitives

Primitive parsers can be used to match characters, string, lower case character, digits, etc... The Prims class can be used to create such parsers.

Combination

Combination parsers can be used to combine parsers, like sequence and star in the example. The Ops class can be used to create such parsers.

The match

The ParserMatch class describes the parser match.

The Scanner

Like the parser, the scanner is also an abstract concept, represented by the IScanner interface. The task of the scanner is to feed the sequential input data stream to the parser. The scanner is of an input source and a cursor. The cursor is moved along by the parsers. Parsers extract data from the scanner and position the iterator appropriately through its member functions.

Semantic actions

A composite parser forms a hierarchy. Parsing proceeds from the topmost parent parser which delegates and apportions the parsing task to its children recursively to its childeren's children and so on until a primitive is reached. By attaching semantic actions to various points in this hierachy, in effect we can transform the flat linear input stream into a structured representation. This is essentially what parsers do.

The Rule

The Rule class represents a non-terminal parser. Basically, it is a wrapper around another parser. This aspect will be illustrated in the example below.

The Classic Calculator Example

There is still a lot to say about Spirit and Spart but I will cut to a final example. A better documentation should appear in a near future as this library is totally new!

The favorite grammar example in the Spirit documentation is a calculator grammar:

  • EBNF:
    group       ::= '(' expression ')'
    factor      ::= integer | group
    term        ::= factor (('*' factor) | ('/' factor))*
    expression  ::= term (('+' term) | ('-' term))*
  • Spirit (C++):
    group       = '(' >> expression >> ')';
    factor      = integer | group;
    term        = factor >> *(('*' >> factor) | ('/' >> factor));
    expression  = term >> *(('+' >> term) | ('-' >> term));

Let us now show how to build this grammar with Spart (you can find in the demo applciation). Passing aside some initialization details, the C# code would look as follows:

group.Parser       = Ops.Seq('(',Ops.Seq(expression,')'));
factor.Parser      = integer | group;
term.Parser        = Ops.Seq( factor, Ops.Klenee( 
                        Ops.Seq('*',factor) | Ops.Seq('/',factor) ));
expression.Parser  = Ops.Seq(term,Ops.Klenee(Ops.Seq('+',term) | 
                        Ops.Seq('-',term) ))

In the above, group, factor, term and expression are Rule object that have been previously initliazed:

// declaration 
Rule group; 
...
group = new Rule();

Note also, that the | operator can be overriden in C#, therefore we use it to create an alternative parser.

Debugging

It can be usefull to trace the scanner state and the parser matches. Similarly to Spirit, you can attach a tracer that will output a lot of interresting info:

// declaration in the Calculator class
Debugger debug;
...
// in the constructor
// create a debugger that outputs to the console
debug = new Debugger( Console.Out ); 

// setting rules name for debugging purpose
group.ID = "group"; 
...

// tracing rules
debug += group;
debug += expression;
...

The output is formated as follows:

  • the output is indented to reflect the parser tree,
  • parser name: ... reflects the start of the parsing and the current scanner input
  • / parser name: ... reflects that the parser has successfully mathed
  • # parser name: ... reflects that there was not mathch.

For example, when launching the parser on the string (5+2)*(4*2), it will output something like this:

expression: (5+2)*(4*2)
    term: (5+2)*(4*2)
        factor: (5+2)*(4*2)
            group: (5+2)*(4*2)
                expression: 5+2)*(4*2)
                    term: 5+2)*(4*2)
                        factor: 5+2)*(4*2)
                            group: 5+2)*(4*2
                            #group: 5+2)*(4*
                            integer: 5+2)*(4
                            /integer: +2)*(4
                        /factor: +2)*(4*2)
                    /term: +2)*(4*2)
                    term: 2)*(4*2)
                        factor: 2)*(4*2)
                            group: 2)*(4*2)
                            #group: 2)*(4*2)
                            integer: 2)*(4*2
                            /integer: )*(4*2
                        /factor: )*(4*2)
                    /term: )*(4*2)
                /expression: )*(4*2)
            /group: *(4*2)
        /factor: *(4*2)
        factor: (4*2)
            group: (4*2)
                expression: 4*2)
                    term: 4*2)
                        factor: 4*2)
                            group: 4*2)
                            #group: 4*2)
                            integer: 4*2)
                            /integer: *2)
                        /factor: *2)
                        factor: 2)
                            group: 2)
                            #group: 2)
                            integer: 2)
                            /integer: )
                        /factor: )
                    /term: )
                /expression: )
            /group:
        /factor:
    /term:
/expression:

ToDo List

There are still a lot of features from Spirit that are not implemented in Spart:

  • numeric parsers!
  • closures,
  • directives,
  • parsers: list_p, confix_p
  • dynamic rules,
  • etc...

References

License

This article has no explicit license attached to it but may contain usage terms in the article text or the download files themselves. If in doubt please contact the author via the discussion board below.

A list of licenses authors might use can be found here

About the Author

Jonathan de Halleux
Engineer
United States United States
Member
Jonathan de Halleux is Civil Engineer in Applied Mathematics. He finished his PhD in 2004 in the rainy country of Belgium. After 2 years in the Common Language Runtime (i.e. .net), he is now working at Microsoft Research on Pex (http://research.microsoft.com/pex).

Sign Up to vote   Poor Excellent
Add a reason or comment to your vote: x
Votes of 3 or less require a comment

Comments and Discussions

 
Hint: For improved responsiveness ensure Javascript is enabled and choose 'Normal' from the Layout dropdown and hit 'Update'.
You must Sign In to use this message board.
Search this forum  
    Spacing  Noise  Layout  Per page   
GeneralRe: Visitor and All things AbstractmemberBen Coding Monkey5 Jan '04 - 1:51 
Jonathan de Halleux wrote: I'll have a coffee before answering   Good Idea, I am going to finish eating my sandwich.   This kind of stuff is where multiple passes of the AST are required. In these passes further information is added to the tree. So decorating the AST is...
GeneralRe: Visitor and All things Abstractmemberadclay15 Mar '05 - 7:20 
An interseting alternative to the Follow Set Error Recovery is the Heuristics Based Error Recovery, based on the concepts of Synchronization Points and Weak Symbols. This method is used (for example) in Wirths Oberon compiler and is integrated in the compiler generator Coco/R.  ...
Generalv1.1 is outmemberJonathan de Halleux2 Jan '04 - 5:59 
You can get v1.1 at www.dotnetwiki.org: added numeric parsers, fixed missing files.   Jonathan de Halleux. www.dotnetwiki.org
GeneralRe: v1.1 is outmemberinshua15 Jan '06 - 22:59 
hi, the page is neerly empty!!   asdf
GeneralZip file missing debug directorymemberandy brummer26 Dec '03 - 9:53 
I downloaded the latest version of the spart_src.zip file and the files in the debug directory are missing.   "Debug\DebugContext.cs" "Debug\Debugger.cs"
GeneralRe: Zip file missing debug directorymemberJonathan de Halleux29 Dec '03 - 5:31 
Ooops, it looks like I've been doing too much cleaning... and deleted the Debug directory.   Right I cannot provider these files since there has been a lot of changes in the spart source and it is currently broken (I've implemented numeric parsers, symbol table, skipping, etc...).  ...
GeneralRe: Zip file missing debug directorymemberJonathan de Halleux2 Jan '04 - 6:00 
Hi, I've uploaded a new version at http://www.dotnetwiki.org[^] Smile | :)
 
Jonathan de Halleux.

www.dotnetwiki.org

GeneralRe: Zip file missing debug directorymemberGordo753 Nov '04 - 5:24 
Sorry, I don't seem to be able to find it on the site. Plus the codeproject source download still lacks the missing files.   Any ideas when this will be updated?   Cheers Gordon
GeneralRe: Zip file missing debug directorymemberodsby26 Dec '04 - 6:25 
When we click on the link it says "Under construction.". Any idea as to when it might be available. Thanks   Surya
QuestionWhat about using an indexer?memberStephen Quattlebaum23 Dec '03 - 4:29 
Unfortunately I don't have time to implement and test this right now (job 1 + job 2 + thesis = aaaarrrrggggghhhh!!!), but here's a thought.   You can't overload [] in C# like you can in C++, but you can define an indexer that gives you the same syntax from the caller's point of view. The...
AnswerRe: What about using an indexer?memberJonathan de Halleux23 Dec '03 - 4:40 
I'll try that. In the meantime there are still some rules to write to get Spart really functional:   - number parsing, uint, int, double - comment_p, list_p (hence refactoring)     Jonathan de Halleux. www.dotnetwiki.org
GeneralRe: What about using an indexer?memberStephen Quattlebaum23 Dec '03 - 9:48 
One thing I thought of but forgot to write before: when C# gets anonymous delegates in C# 2.0, you can do really cool stuff, similar to what you can do in C++ w/ a combination of spirit and boost::lambda. For instance:   IList myList = GetList(); Parser parser = Prims.Ch('x') [ new...
GeneralRe: What about using an indexer?memberJonathan de Halleux23 Dec '03 - 22:18 
Yep, library writers are waiting for Generics (don't know why they don't call template ?).   Anyway, I plan to create a lot of predefined actors. For instance, you example can actually be done as follows   IList myList = GetList(); Parser parser = Prims.Ch('x'); parser.Act +=...
GeneralRe: What about using an indexer?memberStephen Quattlebaum24 Dec '03 - 2:11 
Jonathan de Halleux wrote: don't know why they don't call template ?   To distinguish the two because they really are quite different. I can't find the article I read last week that discussed it, but basically it comes down to compile-time vs. JIT instantiation of types. Templates in...
GeneralRe: What about using an indexer?memberJonathan de Halleux24 Dec '03 - 3:01 
Looking forward this article.   Stephen Quattlebaum wrote: biggest disadvantage of generics is that you lose template metaprogramming (though really that might be an advantage too :rolleyes Ho no! No more exponential compilation times!   Jonathan de Halleux. www.dotnetwiki.org
GeneralRe: What about using an indexer?memberprantlf5 Jan '04 - 23:00 
Generics is for the single, type-abstracted implementation only, no non-type parameters or user specialization; it is also solved during runtime. Another name was chosen not to confuse the people who may expect the same in .NET as in unmanaged C++ (however, classical source-code C++ templates...
GeneralRe: What about using an indexer?memberJonathan de Halleux6 Jan '04 - 0:43 
Thanks for the link very instructing!   Jonathan de Halleux. www.dotnetwiki.org
AnswerRe: What about using an indexer?memberJonathan de Halleux26 Dec '03 - 5:41 
Stephen Quattlebaum wrote: public virtual Parser this[ActionHandler act] { get { Act += act; return this; } }   It works quite well   Jonathan de Halleux. www.dotnetwiki.org
GeneralRe: What about using an indexer?memberStephen Quattlebaum26 Dec '03 - 5:44 
Sweet.
GeneralLooks good!memberBolick22 Dec '03 - 20:11 
But what about performance?   Bolick
GeneralRe: Looks good!memberJonathan de Halleux22 Dec '03 - 20:48 
I have not tested the performance yet.   You can expect that it will be slower the YACC-LEXX based solution or than other C++ library solution such as Spirit or Happy.   There is an ongoing work on the Spirit mailing list for putting up some "benckmark" grammars and spit out some...
GeneralCommentsussMårten R18 Dec '03 - 22:18 
After using boost/spirit rather extensively I have longed for something similar for C#.   And now we have it.   That's why I gave it a 5.   /Mårten
GeneralRe: CommentmemberJonathan de Halleux18 Dec '03 - 23:19 
  Want to contribute ?   Jonathan de Halleux. www.dotnetwiki.org
GeneralURLTOTDmemberleppie18 Dec '03 - 7:49 
sourceforget.net/ ">http://boost.sourceforget.net/ [sourceforget.net/ ">^]   " Sabatier ChefStar 14-Piece Knife Block Set What a GREAT set of Knifes! I consider myself a chef and when I was in school learning, carving and cutting, slicing and dicing, well all I can say is these knifes...
GeneralRe: URLTOTDmemberJonathan de Halleux18 Dec '03 - 22:17 
Fixed !   Jonathan de Halleux. www.dotnetwiki.org

General General    News News    Suggestion Suggestion    Question Question    Bug Bug    Answer Answer    Joke Joke    Rant Rant    Admin Admin   

Permalink | Advertise | Privacy | Mobile
Web01 | 2.6.130516.1 | Last Updated 23 Dec 2003
Article Copyright 2003 by Jonathan de Halleux
Everything else Copyright © CodeProject, 1999-2013
Terms of Use
Layout: fixed | fluid