Click here to Skip to main content
Click here to Skip to main content

String Vs StringBuilder (C#)

By , 1 May 2004
 

Introduction

This is my second article regarding performance. Most of the people use string everywhere in their code. Actually when doing string concatenation, do you know what exactly you are doing? It has a big drawback mainly in concatenation which can be overcome by StringBuilder. It will give a vast improvement in performance when you use concatenation of string over String.

What is the Exact Difference?

First we will look at what happens when you concatenate two strings. For a rough idea, think like this. In a loop, you are adding few numbers to get a string to give all the numbers.

string returnNumber = "";
for(int i = 0; i<1000; i++)
{ 
    returnNumber = returnNumber + i.ToString();
}

Here we are defining a string called returnNumber and after that, in the loop we are concatenating the old one with the new to get a string. Do you know when we do like that we are assigning it again and again? I mean it's really like assigning 999 new strings!

Actually the concatenation will create a new string returnNumber, with both old returnNumber and i.ToString(). If we think roughly, how will the performance of the code be? Can you imagine it? No one thinks about this when coding.

If we can have something which is to be defined only once and add all the strings into it, what can you say about the performance. That's what StringBuilder does.

StringBuilder returnNumber = new StringBuilder(10000);
for(int i = 0; i<1000; i++)
{ 
    returnNumber.Append(i.ToString());
}

We are creating a StringBuilder of length 10000 in memory where we can add all the strings. This surely won't create a new string each and every time. Actually we are creating a StringBinder, and whenever something is added it will get copied into that memory area. At the end, we can get the string by StringBuilder.ToString(). Here also, it won't create a new string. It will return a string instance that will point to the string inside the StringBuilder. See, how efficient this is?

To explain this in a practical manner, I'm not going to analyze IL code or Optimized JIT compiled code. You can see the differences by running the samples.

Why String? Can't Use StringBinder Everywhere?

No. You can't. When initializing a StringBuilder, you are going down in performance. Also many actions that you do with string can't be done with StringBinder. Actually it is used mostly for situations as explained above. Last week, I showed a person who used StringBuilder to just add two strings together! It's really nonsense. We must really think about the overhead of initialization. In my personal experience, a StringBuilder can be used where more than four or more string concatenations take place. Also if you try to do some other manipulation (like removing a part from the string, replacing a part in the string, etc.), then it's better not to use StringBuilder at those places. This is because we are anyway creating new strings. Another important issue. We must be careful to guess the size of StringBuilder. If the size which we are going to get is more than what is assigned, it must increase the size. This will reduce its performance.

History

  • 19th April, 2004: Article submitted

License

This article, along with any associated source code and files, is licensed under The Code Project Open License (CPOL)

About the Author

Chester Ragel
Web Developer
Singapore Singapore
Member
No Biography provided

Sign Up to vote   Poor Excellent
Add a reason or comment to your vote: x
Votes of 3 or less require a comment

Comments and Discussions

 
Hint: For improved responsiveness ensure Javascript is enabled and choose 'Normal' from the Layout dropdown and hit 'Update'.
You must Sign In to use this message board.
Search this forum  
    Spacing  Noise  Layout  Per page   
GeneralMy vote of 1memberMukesh_B18 Feb '13 - 22:26 
GeneralVote of 4memberIsmail482 Jan '13 - 2:09 
SuggestionThought I'd share, great way to automate Stringbuilder object creationmemberSuck League20 Oct '12 - 8:10 
GeneralMy vote of 3memberRyan Leeder24 May '12 - 19:00 
GeneralMy vote of 4memberehab.abuzied23 May '12 - 3:23 
GeneralMy vote of 2memberSenthilkumar Elangovan6 Apr '12 - 10:45 
GeneralMy vote of 1memberMember 846447828 Dec '11 - 7:30 
GeneralMy vote of 4memberawaisdar11 Dec '11 - 7:00 
GeneralMutable vs ImmutablememberVozzie230 Nov '10 - 3:37 
GeneralGood ArticlememberShalinD27 Mar '10 - 19:30 
Generalthnxmembergoher16 Feb '10 - 2:07 
GeneralStringBuilder Vs StringmemberSuresh271298 Oct '07 - 21:11 
GeneralImprove Performance with Unnessary String CreationmemberCodeEnjoy2 Aug '07 - 2:59 
GeneralSome good Blog entries on .net String performancememberandy brummer29 Apr '04 - 6:54 
GeneralStringBuilder is OFTEN not fastermemberKenneth Beckett29 Apr '04 - 6:01 
GeneralRe: StringBuilder is OFTEN not fastermemberkelvinninh29 Apr '04 - 6:25 
GeneralRe: StringBuilder is OFTEN not fastermemberThomas Freudenberg2 May '04 - 19:53 
GeneralRe: StringBuilder is OFTEN not fastermemberBrian Delahunty28 Jul '04 - 23:47 
GeneralRe: StringBuilder is OFTEN not fastermemberMagikos28 Sep '04 - 8:31 
GeneralRe: StringBuilder is OFTEN not fastermemberjmelgaard17 Oct '07 - 4:17 
QuestionStringBinder?memberThomas Freudenberg20 Apr '04 - 21:37 
AnswerRe: StringBinder?memberChester Ragel20 Apr '04 - 21:51 
GeneralRe: StringBinder?memberThomas Freudenberg20 Apr '04 - 22:17 
GeneralRe: StringBinder?memberKenneth Beckett29 Apr '04 - 5:51 
GeneralRe: StringBinder?memberChester Ragel2 May '04 - 17:47 

General General    News News    Suggestion Suggestion    Question Question    Bug Bug    Answer Answer    Joke Joke    Rant Rant    Admin Admin   

Permalink | Advertise | Privacy | Mobile
Web04 | 2.6.130516.1 | Last Updated 2 May 2004
Article Copyright 2004 by Chester Ragel
Everything else Copyright © CodeProject, 1999-2013
Terms of Use
Layout: fixed | fluid