Fighting over religion and being religiously neutral are two different things, in my opinion. Just that such incidents have increased in number and are being highlighted by political parties and the mainstream media in a way like never before.
When they implemented odd-even formula, people said it will not work or said its very less impactful. They argued that its a good initiative and should support it and see how it goes. Told others not be cynical.
Few weeks later when central government announced Delhi (though only small part) as a smart city candidate, why is AAP cribbing about size. Why don't they give a chance and see how it works out and iron out any problems so that it can be rolled out on larger scale.
They need reality check
Too much of good is bad,mix some evil in it
What I have understood from the news is that, only "New Delhi Municipal Council" [NDMC] area which is about 40 SqKm is included in the list.
APP says that, as this houses most of the embassies, VIP houses, central govt offices and Presidents house this is already a developed area and they are questioning why to spend on an already developed area, rather than develop the slum part of the city.
I really do not know whom to support here, AAP or Center
in first T-20 Match, India play well and won the match by 37 runs. Virat,Aswin,Jadeja,Bumrah,Nehra and all player play well.according to that performance i think india will won the t-20 series . and what you r Predict?
She's a Malayalam actress but also acted(show stealer) in bunch of Tamil movies which're good. Nice Character actress[^]. Both Kollywood & Tollywood are famous for treating actresses like cr@p but fortunately few actress like her was able to make good acting. One of the underrated actresses. Before her Actress Sukumari, RIP[^](who's also Malayalam actress) did great job in past.
You Mallu guys're really lucky to have great industry(with great movies, actors, actresses, etc.,) which is superior to all other crappy Masala-woods.
Virat was 84 off 63, and then 100 off 89 or something like that. He got his last 11 runs off 22 balls to get his hundred
. . .
In the three ODIs that India batted first, they scored 67, 67 and 60 from overs 31 to 40. These have been the overs when their set batsmen have approached their hundreds. In Perth, Rohit took 24 balls from 83 at the start of the 31st over to reach his century. Similarly in Brisbane, between the 30th and the 40th overs, Rohit took 21 balls to move from 86 to 100. Virat Kohli took 15 balls to score the last 16 runs to his century between the 38th and 43rd overs in Melbourne.
Clearly that is a problem, specially when the games were mostly lost with a margin of an over or so, and where 15 runs could have made a difference.
A batsman slowing down for his 100 would be analogous to a bowler asking for 2 slips and a gully during the slog overs, because he wanted wickets above conserving runs.
That is really an interesting analysis from Maxwell, its surprising as well, in terms of player like Maxwell can thinks in that direction, I have always seen Maxwell batting in similar fashion as Sehwag.
The point that I was making, and it related more to when India were setting totals and had plenty of wickets in hand, is that the scoring rate seemed to slow as milestones got close, which can sometimes be the case, especially when teams are batting first.
I have felt this always when a player comes closer to 100 gets slowdown and sometimes ruin the momentum and then after getting 100 player gets out adding mere 10-15 runs more.
If team is chasing, then the approach which Maxwell took looks more sensible then getting personal 100 and becomes careless afterwards and then get out.
You can have all the tools in the world but if you don't genuinely believe in yourself, it's useless.
Last Visit: 31-Dec-99 19:00 Last Update: 11-Feb-16 23:37