|
yes guys i agree with all your suggestions apologize for that priority mentioned in my post.
|
|
|
|
|
Hello.
If I want to write article about implementation of some interesting algorithm from computer science on specific popular language (and probably, there are no publications of this algorithm on this language or even all similar languages, so it does matter), then what section of CodeProject should I choose - suitable section of "Algorithms and Recipes" or chosen language's section?
|
|
|
|
|
As the focus of your article is the implementation of the algorithm, it would seem appropriate to choose the algorithm section.
This space for rent
|
|
|
|
|
I hope the site support it 
I found that writing markdown is faster than using WYSIWYG editor since it allow me to focus on the content and not the formatting issues.
|
|
|
|
|
Unfortunately we do not currently support that in the article editor.
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
CodeProject
|
|
|
|
|
Simply write your article, with minimum formatting and let CP staff to do it for you...
Skipper: We'll fix it.
Alex: Fix it? How you gonna fix this?
Skipper: Grit, spit and a whole lotta duct tape.
|
|
|
|
|
Don't take care of formatting, just Write your article, gather your images and zip them all together in one file and email it to Submit@codeproject.com
CP guys will take care of it
Happy Article writing
-Prasad
Find More .Net development tips at : .NET Tips
The only reason people get lost in thought is because it's unfamiliar territory.
|
|
|
|
|
You can use Pandoc for Markdown -> HTML conversion. It works pretty fine except of several cases.
|
|
|
|
|
It also supports conversion to other formats.
|
|
|
|
|
No. I do not want to write an article just now...but just found on my backup disk an old article (kind of research paper?) from Microsoft about BLOB...
I saw a few questions about it over my time here (they are coming back periodically), and thought it was a good reading...But, where to post the link (or the PDF itself)?
Skipper: We'll fix it.
Alex: Fix it? How you gonna fix this?
Skipper: Grit, spit and a whole lotta duct tape.
|
|
|
|
|
Kornfeld Eliyahu Peter wrote: No. I do not want to write an article just now...
Kornfeld Eliyahu Peter wrote: .... and thought it was a good reading...But, where to post the link (or the PDF itself)?
I'm not sure but if you have some additional explanation/content, you could post it as a Reference(Like Tip/Trick or Article)
|
|
|
|
|
Does CP support the publication of translations of already published articles? Specifically, I have received a Russian translation of my "JavaScript Summary", and I'm wondering how I can publish it on CP. There should be an option or menu item similar to "Alternative version".
|
|
|
|
|
If I understand your question, unfortunately we only publish articles in English.
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
CodeProject
|
|
|
|
|
I had a post that I hadn't intended to upload to Code Project so I didn't mark it with the CodeProject tag. But it seems blogger has set the entire channel to also be marked as CodeProject and as such my article has been automatically consumed.
Is there anyway I can explicitly mark a blog post to not be consumed? (I don't want future posts to be marked as spam)
|
|
|
|
|
I recommend using a rel-tag. You can see how to use them here:
Code Project Technical Blog FAQ[^]
Is there a post you wanted removed from CodeProject?
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
CodeProject
|
|
|
|
|
Sorry for the late reply. I will look into using those now 
+ I don't need anything removing
|
|
|
|
|
Countered univote.
What do you get when you cross a joke with a rhetorical question?
The metaphorical solid rear-end expulsions have impacted the metaphorical motorized bladed rotating air movement mechanism.
Do questions with multiple question marks annoy you???
|
|
|
|
|
I have read Licenses. I want to submit an article of mostly original work under the CPOL license. One file in that article could be seen as a derived work covered by the Apache License 2.0. Can I submit under CPOL or does Apache License 2.0 overpower and zombify my article?
Zombify may not be the correct term, but I hope you know what I'm asking.
|
|
|
|
|
You can use multiple licenses for different parts and indicate this in the license section of the article. You may use for example the Apache license for your code, the CPOL for the article text, and a Creative Commons license for the images created by you.
It is even possible to use different licenses for different source code modules when the combination is allowed according to the used licenses. But this is a difficult legal aspect (see for example License compatibility - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia[^]). So it would be better to use a single license for the code. An exception might by a demo application where the additional code not belonging to the basic work can use a different license.
When having different licenses you should add corresponding headers to all of your source files. But I suggest to do this anyway even when all is covered by one license.
|
|
|
|
|
Thank you, Jochen. Good information I couldn't find easily here.
I solved my derived Apache work problem by taking a different approach. I'd call the new work original but "obvious" now. Still, its good to know I could use an Apache License 2.0 header on one file and cover others by CPOL.
Thanks again.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Looks like it's his blog - his other article and his tip both appear on the same site, and the name in the site header matches his username here.
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
It is definitely his work - but when CP consumes a blog (as a blog) it automatically has a link to the original beside it...
My question is how CP tolerates a complete repost of an article, without any link? Does it acceptable, or should the author turn to the blog-consuming solution?
Skipper: We'll fix it.
Alex: Fix it? How you gonna fix this?
Skipper: Grit, spit and a whole lotta duct tape.
|
|
|
|
|
I just published an update to my article:
Destroy All Passwords: Never Memorize A Password Again[^]
Somehow, the update was pushed through and it seems to be published to everyone, but I can't quite tell, because suddenly it just appears when I click the link.
However, I did not receive points for updating (don't mind, just mentioning as part of the issue) and the article doesn't show as updated on today's date, which is interesting.
Any thoughts on this one?
Can everyone see the updated article?
Thanks,
|
|
|
|
|
Should be marked as updated now
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
CodeProject
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
