I published an article recently (see here[^]). But it seems that it was not set up correctly:
1) The code is not browsable (not commited into the git repository). Am I supposed to do it myself? If so how?
2) The popularity of the article is 0.00, which is likely not true since it has some audience and downloads.
Is this article is only half living somehow?
Hope somebody can help me. Just noticed that the last editor of this article Facade to disparate databases[^] has included a few extraneous XML tags in some C# code. The added tag is </integratedfaultcontracts> and is in the 'Take a License', 'Update a Use' and 'Delete a Use' paragraphs, last item after the closing brace.
Please could someone let me know how I can fix this? When I try to update the article I don't see the version with those changes in it.
I've done it again. I wrote an article, but apparently I used too few words. Question to the moderators and reviewers, since when quantity trumpets quality? Things that used to take us hundreds of lines of code, became one-liners, which do not require elaborate explanation or walk-through. So why are the reviewers stuck in the mindset that more words is better?
Last Visit: 31-Dec-99 18:00 Last Update: 9-Mar-14 7:11