Article Writing

Re: AGPL License question

14-Sep-15 5:45

For more information about the types please read:
Code Project Article FAQ - Article[^]
Code Project Article FAQ - Tip[^]

M.D.V.

If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.

AGPL License question

DotNetSteve7-Sep-15 2:20

DotNetSteve

7-Sep-15 2:20

I want to publish an article on ItextSharp, using it to export filled in form fields to a SQLite database.

ITextSharp is AGPL license. Is there an appropriate license to use when publishing the article and code?

Or can I not include code, but a reference to a company blog site with code available there under AGPL license?

Your guidance is appreciated.

Steve Contos

Chris Maunder8-Sep-15 4:00

Chris Maunder

8-Sep-15 4:00

If it's using AGPL v3 then you can publish under GPLv3.

cheers

Chris Maunder

Translated from russian?

Kornfeld Eliyahu Peter6-Sep-15 2:29

Kornfeld Eliyahu Peter

6-Sep-15 2:29

This: http://www.codeproject.com/script/Articles/ArticleVersion.aspx?waid=182451&aid=1027613[^]
From this: http://blog.incframework.com/ru/client-template/[^]

How we should handle it? Any comments @sean-ewington?

Skipper: We'll fix it.
Alex: Fix it? How you gonna fix this?
Skipper: Grit, spit and a whole lotta duct tape.

Re: Translated from russian?

Jochen Arndt6-Sep-15 3:19

Jochen Arndt

6-Sep-15 3:19

There is also an english version of the blog at http://blog.incframework.com/en/client-template/[^].

So it would be fine when the type is changed to Blog.

Re: Translated from russian?

Sean Ewington8-Sep-15 5:10

My article is eaten by the hamsters

8-Sep-15 5:10

In this particular case I need to talk to the author about a non-language related issue first.

Thanks,
Sean Ewington
CodeProject

newton.saber2-Sep-15 11:40

newton.saber

2-Sep-15 11:40

Luckily, before I left the in-progress edit of my article I saved off the HTML, but in any case this article won't display for me:
http://www.codeproject.com/Articles/1024774/Firebase-Web-Apps-Will-Change-Your-Thinking-WebSoc[^]

Click the link, you'll probably see the angry hamsters.
Can anyone help?
Thanks,

Re: My article is eaten by the hamsters

newton.saber2-Sep-15 15:55

newton.saber

2-Sep-15 15:55

I've been trying for a few hours now. It finally came back. No more hamsters.

Approval the new version please.

shunninghuang1-Sep-15 5:29

shunninghuang

1-Sep-15 5:29

CPS1.NET
No downloads and no image, you approval it soon.
Now I've fixed it, and there is a new version of it. But no one approval it. Why? Approval the new version please.

Re: Approval the new version please.

Nelek1-Sep-15 5:36

Re: Approval the new version please.

1-Sep-15 5:36

This is a world wide site, the people who likes your article to be approved might be sleeping or at work. Please be patient.

~~By the way, the images are not being displayed~~ forget it, images are there now

M.D.V.

Chris Maunder1-Sep-15 6:00

Chris Maunder

1-Sep-15 6:00

Some of us compulsive editors are awake Wink | ;)

cheers

Chris Maunder

Re: Approval the new version please.

Nelek1-Sep-15 6:04

Including files and images correctly

1-Sep-15 6:04

I have asked Sean below about the images. I know they are justified by the article and they are kinda needed for the explanation as well. But lately Sean asked us to be a bit harder with it and point him out such cases because of possible copyright issues.

What do you mean in this case?

M.D.V.

Member 119313511-Sep-15 0:52

Member 11931351

1-Sep-15 0:52

I've had a little bit of trouble when embedding images and files in articles (using the functions in the right side bar). Sometimes they display correct when editing and previewing, but not on the article once it's been queued for publishing.

Has this something to do with the pending state or is there something else I should check when writing an article?

One that looked fine in preview but not pending is:
www.codeproject.com/script/Articles/ArticleVersion.aspx?waid=181488&aid=1023523[^]

Re: Including files and images correctly

Sean Ewington1-Sep-15 5:08

Re: Including files and images correctly

1-Sep-15 5:08

Unfortunately we still have not isolated this bug. Once the article is published, the images will look fine.

Thanks,
Sean Ewington
CodeProject

Fredrik Schultz1-Sep-15 6:14

Fredrik Schultz

1-Sep-15 6:14

Thanks for the quick feedback!

Another one to be checked

Nelek29-Aug-15 4:57

29-Aug-15 4:57

Hi @Sean-ewington

another one to be checked (although I am pretty sure about the result)
http://www.codeproject.com/script/Articles/ArticleVersion.aspx?waid=181356&aid=1023175[^]

M.D.V.

Sean Ewington31-Aug-15 8:01

31-Aug-15 8:01

Just to confirm, are you reporting the movie images?

Thanks,
Sean Ewington
CodeProject

Nelek1-Sep-15 5:29

1-Sep-15 5:29

yes, as you told in other message

Is it wrong?

M.D.V.

Sean Ewington1-Sep-15 7:35

1-Sep-15 7:35

This is a very weird case. It's almost meta. It looks like he's making a movie review website, and taking screenshots of his movie reviews. There are different allowances (I believe) for using images on movie review sites, but this is simply an image of a movie review site and does not contain actually movie criticism. Still ...

This may be too complicated to call definitely from my chair.

Thanks,
Sean Ewington
CodeProject

Nelek1-Sep-15 11:37

1-Sep-15 11:37

Sean Ewington wrote:
This may be too complicated to call definitely from my chair.

Noone said it was going to be easy. Actually tough ones are exactly the ones where I don't say anything to the user. If it is a easy one I try it myself.

M.D.V.

Nelek1-Sep-15 5:39

1-Sep-15 5:39

This one is one is a difficult one.

I like the article and the images are kinda needed for the explanation, but I think they are copyright of the arcade games company, and the 50 years are not over yet.

http://www.codeproject.com/script/Articles/ArticleVersion.aspx?waid=181719&aid=998595[^]

M.D.V.

Sean Ewington1-Sep-15 8:26

1-Sep-15 8:26

MAME alone is a tricky legal issue, I am not qualified to make an accurate final ruling, but as you say the article does not work without the images so we'll leave it for now.

Thanks,
Sean Ewington
CodeProject

Nelek1-Sep-15 11:38

1-Sep-15 11:38

Is there any other CP-Staff Member that is deeper in such thema?

M.D.V.

Sean Ewington2-Sep-15 7:47

2-Sep-15 7:47

Yes and no. So I took the cans of worms to our lawyers who gave us more cans and more worms and some thinking and discussing to do internally. So for now please sit tight. We will arrive at a conclusion in due course.

Thanks,
Sean Ewington
CodeProject

Nelek2-Sep-15 8:17