|
Spacious. Minimalist. Clean. Bountiful white space has become the de facto design aesthetic in consumer apps. Life was so much easier when everything was battleship grey
|
|
|
|
|
I've just tried for seven minutes to reach (a copy of) the article that isn't slaved to the medium.com con artists, but failed, so I can't read it.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
A popular note on the Linux Kernel Mailing List claims that a program's author can block people from using his code at his discretion. Wrong. "No backsies!"
|
|
|
|
|
I'm not convinced and until it's tested in court, nobody should be.
|
|
|
|
|
Wow. This could bring back the AOL days -- "ill send the fbi to ur house!!!!"
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
Ponemon says that a third of companies do not believe they could fend off a data-stealing cyberattack in 2019. Look to your right. Look to your left. Now duck.
|
|
|
|
|
WTF do they care?
It's been shown that proper spin on the way you handle a data breach means that it won't affect your bottom line, so who amongst the CEOs and CFOs gives a f***?
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
This is awful on so many levels.
how confident are you that your organization can avoid a data breach:
Very confident: 10%
Confident: 23%
Somewhat Confident: 23%
Not confident: 44%
At a minimum that reduces to roughly 1 in 2 companies can't protect themselves from a breach. But I think it's more likely the headline reader misunderstood the data (or the chart creator got it backwards), and based on the survey data it should read "Only One in Three Enterprises can Protect Themselves from Data Breaches".
OTOH I suspect what the data really shows is that 56% of companies are in denial about their risk of being breached. 
Did you ever see history portrayed as an old man with a wise brow and pulseless heart, weighing all things in the balance of reason?
Is not rather the genius of history like an eternal, imploring maiden, full of fire, with a burning heart and flaming soul, humanly warm and humanly beautiful?
--Zachris Topelius
Training a telescope on one’s own belly button will only reveal lint. You like that? You go right on staring at it. I prefer looking at galaxies.
-- Sarah Hoyt
|
|
|
|
|
NASA is finally saying goodbye to its Opportunity rover on Mars after spending nearly a year trying to reestablish communication with the silent robot. It's a lost Opportunity T_T
|
|
|
|
|
Only eight months?
Give it a chance, guys!
I've known devs who've been incommunicado for over a year, but they were still making commits and drawing their salaries, so I just let them get on with it.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Slack today made its Block Kit tool for building more visually appealing apps generally available. The Slack App Directory currently has more than 1,500 apps, and the Slack Platform for the creation of apps and automated bots dates back to 2015. I bet this would come in handy if anyone had a contest to build a Slack app
|
|
|
|
|
To hire tech staff, you need to work with your company’s HR department. Experienced execs and HR professionals share advice for doing it with true success, finding the best possible candidates with minimum cussing. "Must have 20 years experience in brand-new technology" deemed inappropriate
|
|
|
|
|
Don't forget to be a ninja in icon designing.
M.D.V. 
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Good article.
If you haven't been much involved in hiring, bookmark it and read it before talking to HR about finding people.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
No, I'm fine; I haven't fallen on my head, or anything.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
Even a cranky monkey is uncranky twice a day 
TTFN - Kent
|
|
|
|
|
The days of smartwatches as niche devices might be over, at least in the US. "Calling Dick Tracy!"
|
|
|
|
|
Kent Sharkey wrote: "Calling me Dick Tracy!"
FTFY
M.D.V. 
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Kent Sharkey wrote: "Calling Dick Tracy!"
No kidding! Mine does video calls!
I've given up wearing it, though, because it's pretty much Dick Tracy in size, too, and I like to wear slightly more refined stuff, that doesn't catch on every door jamb, lamp post, and desk.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
So many numbers making my skin crawl with possible misleading assertions.
Quote: determined that 16 percent of American adults, or about a sixth of the group
Suggestion seems to be based on a mix between sales and some group study.
But the sales indicate "smartwatch" - which might not be as clear cut as what people associate that with. Is a "dumb" fitbit grouped into that classification from the sales people to inflate numbers. What of people that replace after 1 or 2 years, potentially halfing the number of "American adults".
And what the hell is that kind of classification "American adults"? Is that American citizen adult of 18+. Which would be some amazing study to be able to separate out the sales figures of true blood Americans and that of foreign posted sales. Or do they mean "Americas" geo-location covering both north and south America? Cause that would be an impressive number.
|
|
|
|
|
Researchers have found a way to run malicious code on systems with Intel processors in such a way that the malware can't be analyzed or identified by antivirus software, using the processor's own features to protect the bad code. And we're all ever so grateful
|
|
|
|
|
Quote: In other words, as far as Intel is concerned, SGX is working as it should, protecting the enclave's contents from the rest of the system. If you run something nasty within the enclave, then the company makes no promises that bad things won't happen to your computer; SGX simply isn't designed to protect against that.
BIG FACEPALM
M.D.V. 
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Kent Sharkey wrote: And we're all ever so grateful
It's beginning to look like we don't need hackers with tech skills, any more; "researchers" are doing all the R&D and development for them.
Who has oversight on these activities? It seems completely ungoverned, with guys just "researching" ways to allow hackers into other people's computers.
They need to be strongly reminded that facilitation of a crime makes you party to the crime.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
Mark_Wallace wrote: They need to be strongly reminded that facilitation of a crime makes you party to the crime.
That would depend on whether their invention has any purpose other than criminal activities. Would the inventor of a new type of steak knife (e.g. one that cuts steak better than existing knives) be held responsible for the murders committed with the knives?
Freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two make four. If that is granted, all else follows.
-- 6079 Smith W.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
