|
Kent Sharkey wrote: Don’t trust Google Chrome’s incognito mode
FTFY
M.D.V. 
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Nelek wrote: Kent Sharkey wrote: Don’t trust Google Chrome’s incognito mode
FTFY
You missed a bit.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
Amazon CodeGuru is a machine learning service for automated code reviews and application performance recommendations. Because I've always needed to scale my code reviews to the cloud
|
|
|
|
|
It's only a matter of time before there's an Amazon CodeProject. 
/ravi
|
|
|
|
|
Bite your tongue Ravi! 
"the debugger doesn't tell me anything because this code compiles just fine" - random QA comment
"Facebook is where you tell lies to your friends. Twitter is where you tell the truth to strangers." - chriselst
"I don't drink any more... then again, I don't drink any less." - Mike Mullikins uncle
|
|
|
|
|
Only USD 0.05 per post and USD 0.75 per answer in Q&A! 
TTFN - Kent
|
|
|
|
|
Is that cheaper than Expert Sex Change? 
/ravi
|
|
|
|
|
It’s really just a small set of fixes and refinements over .NET Core 3.0, which we released just over two months ago. Stick them with the pointy version
Three years of support! Hurrah, better develop something fast so it can be replaced soon.
|
|
|
|
|
Seems to me they've been small fix/refining it for four years...
I heard EOL for .Net Core was January 2021, but only because that's when they plan to roll out the new .Net Core 4.0 icon.
".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010
-----
You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010
-----
When you pry the gun from my cold dead hands, be careful - the barrel will be very hot. - JSOP, 2013
modified 3-Dec-19 15:19pm.
|
|
|
|
|
And shorter lifespans - 3 years for a "LTS"? Yeeesh.
Jan 2021 sounds about right. They had scheduled the merger of .NET Core and .NET Framework (.NET Corework?) for Nov 2020[^], but your date is probably more accurate).
TTFN - Kent
|
|
|
|
|
Kent Sharkey wrote: And shorter lifespans - 3 years for a "LTS"? Yeeesh.
Yeah. For most of the people who care about LTS that's short enough that they'll probably stay on 4.x until it's EOL and then rewrite onto a non-MS stack. 
Kent Sharkey wrote: Jan 2021 sounds about right. They had scheduled the merger of .NET Core and .NET Framework (.NET Corework?) for Nov 2020[^], but your date is probably more accurate).
If only they actually were merging them, instead of just skipping core 4.0, and then deleting the "core" branding from .net core. While they might have some rough edges like the winform builder working fully instead of being a minimally working preview; they're not actually merging anything. All the legacy features in .net Framework 4.x that aren't in .Net Core 3 won't be in .net Core 5; so if you can't upgrade now without a major rewrite today you won't be able to upgrade in 2 years without a major rewrite. 
Did you ever see history portrayed as an old man with a wise brow and pulseless heart, weighing all things in the balance of reason?
Is not rather the genius of history like an eternal, imploring maiden, full of fire, with a burning heart and flaming soul, humanly warm and humanly beautiful?
--Zachris Topelius
Training a telescope on one’s own belly button will only reveal lint. You like that? You go right on staring at it. I prefer looking at galaxies.
-- Sarah Hoyt
|
|
|
|
|
Scientists from the University of Oxford have developed a tiny nanoscale device that can be programmed using either photons or electrons. Because I just wanted to type, "electro-optical nanoscale device"
Next stop: need to work some quantum in there
|
|
|
|
|
Breaking the rules can bring a little thrill — and produce better, more efficient code "The code is more what you'd call 'guidelines' than actual rules."
Yeah, I'm not sure why I posted this either.
|
|
|
|
|
Why secretly?
"The only place where Success comes before Work is in the dictionary." Vidal Sassoon, 1928 - 2012
|
|
|
|
|
Did I miss a memo?
When did half of these become bad habits?
Non-functional code, seriously?
None of the main programming languages we use today are purely functional so it wouldn't be very crazy if we didn't write them functional.
We can't really do without old-fashioned loops... I mean, it's not like we're all doing functional programming!
Copy-pasting is only half our jobs and it's not wrong in itself, but do it with care.
For number #5 the author explains why this isn't necessarily a bad thing himself.
Bad habit #11: Reading these weird bad habit lists.
|
|
|
|
|
10 bad journalism habits we secretly love
1 Clickbait articles that contain so many adverts and pop-ups it is ten minutes before people can actually read the article
|
|
|
|
|
1a. Pointless splitting said article over two "pages" to increase the number of adverts shown.
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
Bad programming habit No. 1: Copying
Bad programming habit No. 7: Writing your own data structures
One of the standard rules is that a programmer should never write code for storing data after completing the data structures course in their sophomore year. Someone else has already written all of the data structures we’ll ever need... Ummm... if I shouldn't copy code and I shouldn't write my own data structures, what am I to do?
Last time I checked no flavor of SQL has ever come equipped with every structure I would ever need.
Maybe I should use some ORM like Entity Framework create the SQL structures... but wouldn't that be a tool which is essentially just automating the copy process?
Director of Transmogrification Services
Shinobi of Query Language
Master of Yoda Conditional
|
|
|
|
|
Roses are red,
Violets are blue,
Don't take away
My precious goto.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
VCs have gone wild for back-end developer-oriented technologies, but front-end technologies like Next.js are heating up. Where no one has gone before?
|
|
|
|
|
Kent Sharkey wrote: Where no one has gone before?
to the infinite and beyond 
M.D.V. 
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Russian President Vladimir Putin on Monday signed legislation requiring all smartphones, computers and smart TV sets sold in the country to come pre-installed with Russian software. "It is a riddle, wrapped in a mystery, inside an enigma"
|
|
|
|
|
Microsoft's Project Verona involves creating a new language for "safe infrastructure programming" to be open-sourced soon. If only there was an existing language with Rust-like syntax, and Rust-like safety
*Kind* of a dupe from the Rust article yesterday, but with a different focus, and new information for people that didn't watch the presentation
|
|
|
|
|
Are they calling it Rust# ?
|
|
|
|
|
No. RustBucket. Where you dump all your best ideas.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
