5,699,997 members and growing! (16,266 online)
Email Password   helpLost your password?
Languages » C / C++ Language » Beginners     Intermediate License: The Code Project Open License (CPOL)

Think before you code, Virtual Functions in C++

By programmersmind

Virtual functions in C++.
C++ (VC6, VC7, VC7.1, VC8.0, C++), C, Dev

Posted: 2 Sep 2008
Updated: 2 Sep 2008
Views: 11,118
Bookmarked: 89 times
Announcements
Loading...



Search    
Advanced Search
Sitemap
119 votes for this Article.
Popularity: 8.29 Rating: 3.99 out of 5
20 votes, 16.8%
1
3 votes, 2.5%
2
5 votes, 4.2%
3
5 votes, 4.2%
4
86 votes, 72.3%
5

Introduction

A few days back, I was doing a job, and unintentionally, I made a mistake in the code (What mistake? That I will explain in the detailed section of the article), and when I was caught by a bug and started de-bugging it, I was amazed how a little mistake can give a programmer a whole lot of pain. Yes, I made a mistake in the virtual function area. How? Let's find out........

Using the code

So, why do we need a virtual function? Everyone knows that. Let's say I have a base class and a few derived class as well; and all the derived classes shares a common function, and in the driver program, I do not want to make a big huge switch/if block. I want to iterate through all the derived types and want to execute the common member function. Like this:

#include <iostream>
#include <vector>
using std::cout;
using std::endl;
using std::vector;
class CommunicationDevices
{
 //Base class has some property, for this article I dont need those
 public:
   inline virtual void which(){
     cout<<"This is a common device..."<<endl;
   }
};

class MobilePhoneWithGSMSupport:public CommunicationDevices
{
  //Derived class also has some extended property, GSM related
  public:
    inline virtual void which(){
     cout<<"This is a Mobile Phone...GSM Supported"<<endl;
    }
};

class MobilePhoneWithCDMASupport:public CommunicationDevices
{
  //Derived class also has some extended property, CDMA related
  public:
    inline void which(){
      cout<<"This is a Mobile Phone....CDMA Supported"<<endl;
    }
};

class Landline:public CommunicationDevices
{
  //Derived class also has some extended property
  public:
    inline void which(){
      cout<<"This is a Landline Phone..."<<endl;
    }
};

class Iphone:public MobilePhoneWithGSMSupport
{
  //More specific IPhone Feature here
  public:
    inline void which(){
      cout<<"This is apple Iphone with AT&T connection, GSM Support only..."
          <<endl;
    }
};


void whichPhoneUserIsUsing(CommunicationDevices &devices){
  devices.which();
}

int main(){
 MobilePhoneWithGSMSupport user1;
 MobilePhoneWithCDMASupport user2;
 Landline user3;
 Iphone user4;
 whichPhoneUserIsUsing(user1);
 whichPhoneUserIsUsing(user2);
 whichPhoneUserIsUsing(user3);
 whichPhoneUserIsUsing(user4);
 return 0;
}

Here, the idea is simple. Since we are using a virtual function in the base class, the “whichPhoneUserIsUsing()” method can take a generic base class argument, and the proper method from the derived class gets accessed depending upon the actual type of the object. This is the beauty of virtual functions. Note that in the method “whichPhoneUserIsUsing()”, we used a reference to the base class as the argument: “CommunicationDevices &devices”, and from the driver (main()), we are passing the derived class' object while calling this function. This is normally called as Upcasting in C++. That is, we are going from the more specific type to the more generic type. And, this casting is type-safe always. As you expected, this code will produce the following o/p:

bash-3.2$ g++ -g -o hello code1.cpp

bash-3.2$ ./hello

This is a Mobile Phone...GSM Supported
This is a Mobile Phone....CDMA Supported
This is a Landline Phone...
This is apple Iphone with AT&T connection, GSM Support only...

Now, consider the following code, only a single character (believe me, just a single character) has been changed here from the previous code:

We just modified our method whichPhoneUserIsUsing() like this:

#include <iostream>
#include <vector>
using std::cout;
using std::endl;
using std::vector;
class CommunicationDevices
{
 //Base class has some property, for this article I dont need those
 public:
   inline virtual void which(){
     cout<<"This is a common device..."<<endl;
   }
};

class MobilePhoneWithGSMSupport:public CommunicationDevices
{
  //Derived class also has some extended property, GSM related
  public:
    inline virtual void which(){
     cout<<"This is a Mobile Phone...GSM Supported"<<endl;
    }
};

class MobilePhoneWithCDMASupport:public CommunicationDevices
{
  //Derived class also has some extended property, CDMA related
  public:
    inline void which(){
      cout<<"This is a Mobile Phone....CDMA Supported"<<endl;
    }
};

class Landline:public CommunicationDevices
{
  //Derived class also has some extended property
  public:
    inline void which(){
      cout<<"This is a Landline Phone..."<<endl;
    }
};

class Iphone:public MobilePhoneWithGSMSupport
{
  //More specific IPhone Feature here
  public:
    inline void which(){
      cout<<"This is apple Iphone with AT&T connection, GSM Support only..."
          <<endl;
    }
};


void whichPhoneUserIsUsing(CommunicationDevices devices){
  devices.which();
}

int main(){
 MobilePhoneWithGSMSupport user1;
 MobilePhoneWithCDMASupport user2;
 Landline user3;
 Iphone user4;
 whichPhoneUserIsUsing(user1);
 whichPhoneUserIsUsing(user2);
 whichPhoneUserIsUsing(user3);
 whichPhoneUserIsUsing(user4);
 return 0;
}

We just modified our method whichPhoneUserIsUsing() like this:

void whichPhoneUserIsUsing(CommunicationDevices devices){

 devices.which();

}

and bang.................given below is the output:

bash-3.2$ g++ -g -o hello code2.cpp 

bash-3.2$ ./hello

This is a common device...
This is a common device...
This is a common device...
This is a common device...

bash-3.2$ vim code2.cpp

So, what gets wrong here?

Yes, you guessed it correctly, it's a famous copy-constructor problem. When the arguments are just a “CommunicationDevices” instead of a reference to it, the function says:

Hey Mr. Programmer, I am bound to create only a temporary object for this function (whichPhoneUserIsUsing()). I am no more responsible to take a reference, so I don't care what kind of actual object you are passing through; I will create a concrete “CommunicationDevices” object, and will copy only those segments from the actual object which are meaningful to me (i.e., which are part of the base class). And, will only invoke the “which” method for this temporary object. And hence, every time you call me, I will call the base class version (i.e., CommunicationDevices version) of the which() method.

This famous property is called Object Bisection, or Object Slicing. Cutting down the desired property from one object and copying it to a concrete base class object.

References:

  1. C++ Programming Language: Bjarne Stroustrup

License

This article, along with any associated source code and files, is licensed under The Code Project Open License (CPOL)

About the Author

programmersmind


int main(){
while(!isSleeping())
{
write_code();
}
return 0;
}
Occupation: Software Developer (Senior)
Company: Rebaca Technologies
Location: United States United States

Other popular C / C++ Language articles:

Article Top
Sign Up to vote for this article
You must Sign In to use this message board.
FAQ FAQ Noise ToleranceSearch Search Messages 
 Layout  Per page   
 Msgs 1 to 25 of 34 (Total in Forum: 34) (Refresh)FirstPrevNext
GeneralMake them constmemberStephen Adrian Hill23:57 8 Sep '08  
GeneralAdvanced OOPmembersickfile22:32 8 Sep '08  
Generalrefactor base codememberCasey Shaar12:48 8 Sep '08  
Generalchange your habitsmemberJ0ker18:25 7 Sep '08  
GeneralRe: change your habitsmemberprogrammersmind9:44 8 Sep '08  
GeneralRe: change your habitsmemberDamir Valiulin11:19 8 Sep '08  
GeneralRe: change your habitsmemberJ0ker18:49 11 Sep '08  
GeneralRe: change your habitsmemberT-Mac-Oz14:43 9 Sep '08  
GeneralRe: change your habitsmemberT-Mac-Oz14:29 9 Sep '08  
GeneralRe: change your habitsmemberJ0ker8:50 11 Sep '08  
GeneralRe: change your habits [modified]memberT-Mac-Oz14:00 11 Sep '08  
GeneralRe: change your habitsmemberJ0ker18:37 11 Sep '08  
GeneralRe: change your habitsmemberT-Mac-Oz19:42 11 Sep '08  
GeneralRe: change your habitsmemberJ0ker2:58 12 Sep '08  
GeneralNice Onememberioeilsk10:33 5 Sep '08  
GeneralRe: Nice Onememberprogrammersmind5:09 11 Sep '08  
GeneralC++ Gotchas vs Lippman and Meyersmemberpg--az19:32 2 Sep '08  
GeneralA few words..... [modified]memberDezhi Zhao12:57 2 Sep '08  
GeneralRe: A few words.....memberprogrammersmind12:32 3 Sep '08  
GeneralRe: A few words.....memberDezhi Zhao19:02 3 Sep '08  
GeneralRe: A few words.....memberCraig Atwood2:16 9 Sep '08  
GeneralRe: A few words.....memberLeblanc Meneses8:02 8 Sep '08  
GeneralAnother misatake through inline?membermdd10:33 2 Sep '08  
GeneralRe: Another misatake through inline?memberprogrammersmind10:43 2 Sep '08  
GeneralRe: Another misatake through inline?memberT-Mac-Oz13:47 9 Sep '08  

General General    News News    Question Question    Answer Answer    Joke Joke    Rant Rant    Admin Admin   

PermaLink | Privacy | Terms of Use
Last Updated: 2 Sep 2008
Editor: Smitha Vijayan
Copyright 2008 by programmersmind
Everything else Copyright © CodeProject, 1999-2008
Web12 | Advertise on the Code Project