![]() |
Database »
Database »
General
Beginner
Brief about Triggers in SQL Server 2000By SquaredRomiA trigger is a database object that is bound to a table. In many aspects, it is similar to a stored procedure. As a matter of fact, triggers are often referred to as a "special kind of stored procedure". |
C++, SQLWin2K, WinXP, Win2003, Visual Studio, SQL 2000, DBA, Dev
|
|
Advanced Search Add to IE Search |
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||
A trigger is a database object that is bound to a table. In many aspects, it is similar to a stored procedure. As a matter of fact, triggers are often referred to as a "special kind of stored procedure".
There are many reasons to use triggers. If you have a table which keeps a log of messages, you may want to have a copy of them mailed to you if they are urgent. If there were no triggers, you would have some solutions, though they are not as elegant. You could modify the application(s) logging the messages. This means that you might be redundantly coding the same thing in every application that logs messages.
Tables can have multiple triggers. The CREATE TRIGGER statement can be defined with the FOR UPDATE, FOR INSERT, or FOR DELETE clauses to target a trigger to a specific class of data modification actions. When FOR UPDATE is specified, the IF UPDATE (column_name) clause can be used to target a trigger to updates affecting a particular column.
SQL Server 2000 greatly enhances trigger functionality, extending the capabilities of the triggers you already know and love, and adding a whole new type of trigger, the "Instead Of" trigger.
SQL Server 2000 has many types of triggers:
Triggers that run after an update, insert, or delete can be used in several ways:
Note: An AFTER trigger can be created only on tables, not on views.
INSERT Triggers INSERT INTO Customers
VALUES (�Mayank�,�Gupta�,�Hauz Khas�,�Delhi�,
�Delhi�,�110016�,�01126853138�)
INSERT INTO Customers
VALUES(�Himanshu�,�Khatri�,�ShahjahanMahal �,
�Jaipur�,�Rajesthan�,�326541�,�9412658745�)
INSERT INTO Customers
VALUES (�Sarfaraz�,�Khan�,�Green Market�,
�Hydrabad�,�AP�,�698542�,�9865478521�)
INSERT INTO Products
VALUES (�ASP.Net Microsoft Press�,550)
INSERT INTO Products
VALUES (�ASP.Net Wrox Publication�,435)
INSERT INTO Products
VALUES (�ASP.Net Unleased�,320)
INSERT INTO Products
VALUES (�ASP.Net aPress�,450)
CREATE TRIGGER invUpdate ON [Orders]
FOR INSERT
AS
UPDATE p SET p.instock=[p.instock � i.qty]
FROM products p JOIN inserted I ON p.prodid = i.prodid
You created INSERT trigger that referenced the logical inserted table. Whenever you insert a new record in the Orders table now, the corresponding record in the Products table will be updated to subtract the quantity of the order from the quantity on hand in the instack column of the Products table.
DELETE Triggers
DELETE triggers are used for restricting the data that your users can remove from a database. For example:
CREATE TRIGGER DelhiDel ON [Customers]
FOR DELETE
AS
IF (SELECT state FROM deleted) = �Delhi�
BEGIN
PRINT �Can not remove customers from Delhi�
PRINT �Transaction has been canceled�
ROOLBACK
END
DELETE trigger uses the logical deleted table to make certain that you were not trying to delete a customer from the great state �Delhi� � if you did try to delete such a customer, you would be met with Mayank in the from of an error message (which was generated by the PRINT statement that you entered in the trigger code).
UPDATE Triggers
UPDATE triggers are used to restrict UPDATE statements issued by your users, or back your previous data.
CREATE TRIGGER CheckStock ON [Products]
FOR UPDATE
AS
IF (SELECT InStock FROM inserted) < 0
BEGIN
PRINT �Cannot oversell Products�
PRINT �Transaction has been cancelled�
ROLLBACK
END
You created an UPDATE trigger that references the inserted table to verify that you are not trying to insert a value that is less than zero. You need to check only the inserted table because SQL Server performs any necessary mathematical functions before inserting your data.
More than one trigger can now be defined on a table for each Insert/Update/Delete. Although in general, you might not want to do this (it's easy to get confused if you over-use triggers), there are situations where this is ideal. One example that springs to mind is that you can split your triggers up into two categories:
This would allow you to alter triggers of one type without fear of accidentally breaking the other.
If you are using multiple triggers, it is of course essential to know which order they fire in. A new stored procedure called sp_settriggerorder allows you to set a trigger to be either the "first" or "last" to fire.
If you want more than two triggers to fire in a specific order, there is no way to specifically define this. A deeply unscientific test I did indicated that multiple triggers for the same table and operation will run in the order they were created unless you specifically tell them otherwise. I would not recommend relying on this though.
Instead Of Triggers fire instead of the operation that fires the trigger, so if you define an Instead Of trigger on a table for the Delete operation, they try to delete rows, they will not actually get deleted (unless you issue another delete instruction from within the trigger) as in this simple example:
CREATE TABLE Mayank (Name varchar(32))
GO
CREATE TRIGGER tr_mayank ON Mayank
INSTEAD OF DELETE
AS
PRINT 'Sorry - you cannot delete this data'
GO
INSERT Mayank
SELECT 'Cannot' union
SELECT 'Delete' union
SELECT 'Me'
GO
DELETE Mayank
GO
SELECT * FROM Mayank
GO
DROP TABLE Mayank
If you were to print out the contents of the inserted and deleted tables from inside an Instead Of trigger, you would see they behave in exactly the same way as normal. In this case, the deleted table holds the rows you were trying to delete, even though they will not get deleted.
Instead of Triggers can be used in some very powerful ways!
If you were to define an Instead Of trigger and an After trigger on the same table for the same operation, what would happen?
Because an After trigger fires after an operation completes, and an 'instead of' trigger prevents the operation from taking place, the After trigger would never fire in this situation.
However, if an Instead Of trigger on a (say) delete operation contains a subsequent delete on the same table, then any After trigger defined for the delete operation on that table will fire on the basis of the delete statement issued from the Instead Of trigger. The original delete statement is not executed, only the Delete in the Instead Of trigger runs.
This code sample creates a trigger of each type, and changed the nature of the delete statement issued so that only comics that have a value of 0 in the Preserve column can be deleted.
CREATE TABLE Gupta (Comic VARCHAR (32), Preserve INT)
GO
INSERT Gupta
SELECT 'groucho', 1 UNION
SELECT 'chico', 1 UNION
SELECT 'harpo', 0 UNION
SELECT 'zeppo', 0
GO
CREATE TRIGGER trGuptaDelete ON Gupta
FOR DELETE
AS
SELECT Comic AS "deleting_these_names_only"
FROM deleted
GO
CREATE TRIGGER tr_Gupta_InsteadOf ON Gupta
INSTEAD OF DELETE
AS
DELETE Gupta
FROM Gupta
INNER JOIN Deleted
ON Gupta.Comic = Deleted.Comic
WHERE Gupta.Preserve= 0
GO
DELETE Gupta WHERE Comic IN ('GROUCHO', 'HARPO')
GO
SELECT * FROM Gupta
DROP TABLE Gupta
Triggers can be used in the following scenarios, such as: if the database is de-normalized and requires an automated way to update redundant data contained in multiple tables, or if customized messages and complex error handling are required, or if a value in one table must be validated against a non-identical value in another table.
Triggers are a powerful tool that can be used to enforce the business rules automatically when the data is modified. Triggers can also be used to maintain the data integrity. But they are not to maintain data integrity. Triggers should be used to maintain the data integrity only if you are unable to enforce the data integrity using CONSTRAINTS, RULES, and DEFAULTS. Triggers cannot be created on the temporary tables.
| You must Sign In to use this message board. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
General
News
Question
Answer
Joke
Rant
Admin
|
PermaLink |
Privacy |
Terms of Use
Last Updated: 17 Jun 2004 Editor: Smitha Vijayan |
Copyright 2004 by SquaredRomi Everything else Copyright © CodeProject, 1999-2009 Web21 | Advertise on the Code Project |