|
I'm crylaughing at myself. I forgot how to enforce operator precedence in parsing code.
I've written it countless times. I have no idea how I forgot. It should be practically muscle memory at this point.
Next I will forget my birthday. 
Check out my IoT graphics library here:
https://honeythecodewitch.com/gfx
And my IoT UI/User Experience library here:
https://honeythecodewitch.com/uix
|
|
|
|
|
|
I find this link today. not sure about its effectiveness.
diligent hands rule....
|
|
|
|
|
Are you expecting us to click an unknown trick kindof link?
|
|
|
|
|
Could be ...  [^]
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
"Common sense is so rare these days, it should be classified as a super power" - Random T-shirt
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
Isn't linking to other interconnected pages sort of the basis for the internet?
How do you browse if you don't trust links?
Besides, southmountain is a long time and upstanding member with 23K, he's not posting spam.
Last, but not least, you can clearly see it's an article on msn by hovering over the link (at least on desktop).
|
|
|
|
|
I am on mobile, not able to see link.
|
|
|
|
|
Smells like the fetid under droppings of the male member of the bovine species to me.
|
|
|
|
|
To be effective you have to shape it in the form of a hat and cover router.
Definition of a burocrate; Delegate, Take Credit, shift blame.
PartsBin an Electronics Part Organizer - Release Version 1.4.0 JaxCoder.com
Latest Article: EventAggregator
|
|
|
|
|
That only helps to keep the government out (be aware that your WiFi enabled microwave won't work anymore though)
|
|
|
|
|
It may work under some conditions because the foil could act as a mirror to the radio waves.
On the other hand, because the wavelength of 2.4 GHz is about 12.5 cm, if the foil was close to the antenna, the reflections could cancel out direct radiation from the antenna in places. This would lead to hit and miss reception depending on the exact placement of the WiFi device.
|
|
|
|
|
This is not a programming question.
Very odd post - I am actually asking for opinions...
Please share your actual experience and tell your opinion
(in few words, do not want to take too much of your time )
what you recommend as
C++ learning book ( no u-tube, PLEASE ) written in
K&R style.
I mean "meat and potatoes" and minimal "click this /click that"
(got one already ) kindergarten picture book of 500 + pages.
Cheers
|
|
|
|
|
C++ is a far bigger language than C, so it can't be done in a small book. I learned it quite a while ago, so I can't give you a current recommendation. But the reviews of this book (by the inventor of C++) sound like it could be what you're looking for:
https://www.amazon.com/Tour-C-Bjarne-Stroustrup/dp/0136816487[^]
|
|
|
|
|
The direct comparison to K&R would be C++ Programming Language by Bjarne Stroustrup This is a 1300+ page book, so it's not something you can get through in an couple of days, which gives you some idea of the difference in size between C++ and C. The book is also more a reference, whereas K&R is almost tutorial in approach.
Alternatively, there's Accelerated C++ by Koenig and Moo That dives straight into the C++ programming with STL. I found it very aproachable and easy to read. My only concern with this book is that it is a bit dated, having been published in 2000, with no newer editions having been published, so additions from C++11...C++23 are not covered (shame!)
I know you don't want YouTube suggestions, but I think C++ Weekly with Jason Turner is worth a look. It's not a course, but he does cover some of the ins and outs of C++. Most videos are less than 20 minutes long, and can provide some insights as to why, for example, you might want to avoid using std::endl.
"A little song, a little dance, a little seltzer down your pants"
Chuckles the clown
|
|
|
|
|
Essential C++ [Book]
Looks like not many C++ authors are updating their books, but this is a consise introduction to C++. Covers a number of important topics, but dated 1999, previous millennium.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wordle 1,041 3/6
⬛🟨⬛🟨⬛
⬛🟩🟨🟩🟨
🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
|
|
|
|
|
Wordle 1,041 4/6
⬜⬜⬜🟨⬜
🟨🟨⬜⬜🟨
⬜🟨⬜🟨🟨
🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
|
|
|
|
|
Wordle 1,041 4/6
⬜⬜🟨⬜⬜
⬜🟨⬜🟨🟨
🟨🟨⬜🟨🟨
🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
Doesn't look like a formal dictionary word, isn't it?
|
|
|
|
|
Wordle 1,041 4/6*
⬜🟨⬜⬜⬜
🟨⬜🟨🟨⬜
🟨🟨🟩🟩🟩
🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
Happiness will never come to those who fail to appreciate what they already have. -Anon
And those who were seen dancing were thought to be insane by those who could not hear the music. -Frederick Nietzsche
|
|
|
|
|
⬜🟨⬜🟨⬜
🟩🟩⬜⬜🟨
🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
In a closed society where everybody's guilty, the only crime is getting caught. In a world of thieves, the only final sin is stupidity. - Hunter S Thompson - RIP
|
|
|
|
|
Wordle 1,041 5/6
⬛⬛🟨🟨⬛
🟨🟨🟨🟨⬛
🟨⬛🟨🟨🟨
🟨🟨🟩🟩🟩
🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
Ok, I have had my coffee, so you can all come out now!
|
|
|
|
|
Wordle 1,041 3/6*
⬜🟨🟨⬜⬜
⬜🟨⬜🟩🟨
🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
"Common sense is so rare these days, it should be classified as a super power" - Random T-shirt
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
Wordle 1,041 5/6
🟨⬜🟨🟨⬜
⬜🟨🟨⬜🟨
⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜
⬜⬜⬜⬜🟩
🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
|
|
|
|
|
Following discusses a new feature in C# which as it looks to me, just means code can be written in even more obscure ways to no point. It allows one to implicitly specify a constructor.
Refactor your C# code with primary constructors - .NET Blog[^]
I have been doing this a long in multiple OO languages and I can say for certain that I never, not even once, wished that I could write code that would mingle the constructor with a method call.
Seems like a perfect way for someone to decide to make modifications after the fact without refactoring but by trying to hack a way into using the same code.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
