|
A YouTube video reminded me that Visual Studio is shipped with Blend. And indeed I have Blend for VS2022 on my system!
I just wonder what's it's good for? Why would I use it over Visual Studio and when?!
|
|
|
|
|
I had the version that came with the other tools, such as the one that provided graphic tools similar to Adobe - maybe not as powerful, but more than adequate for WPF. It integrated well with Blend. Now that it is no longer available, Blend seems not a useful for me.
Once in a while I might use it tweak some WPF layout, but not all that often anymore....
|
|
|
|
|
If I remember correctly it was sold in the past together with the Expression Design drawing program.
Blend is aimed at graphic designers that have no programming knowledge and don't understand Visual Studio.
|
|
|
|
|
Guess it ain't for me!
I wonder if it has some advantages....
I think I remember it helps capture default template...
|
|
|
|
|
I understand it's a better form designer for WPF and UWP. It doesn't support WinForms nor Xamarin Forms.
|
|
|
|
|
I found it much easier to create all the CSS rules by hand than using Blend... It has an UI too complicated for me...
"The only place where Success comes before Work is in the dictionary." Vidal Sassoon, 1928 - 2012
|
|
|
|
|
Quote: vMOX is doubling down and expanding its best-in-class engineering team. What's vMOX? vMOX is a profitable, privately-held pure-play managed mobility services (MMS) provider that enables enterprises to declare victory over complex IT challenges.
We’re partnering with them to help them find seriously talented remote Software Engineers across all levels of experience, interested?
Besides the buzzword bingo jargon (pure-play???), the "seriously talented...across all levels of experience" is quite the oxymoron.  Yup, I'm seriously talented as a football quarterback, nevermind I have no experience as a football quarterback.
|
|
|
|
|
It's possible to have talent, but limited experience, isn't it?
The difficult we do right away...
...the impossible takes slightly longer.
|
|
|
|
|
I've known some people with loads of experience and no talent as well ... 
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
"Common sense is so rare these days, it should be classified as a super power" - Random T-shirt
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
HEY! I resemble that remark! 
Anything that is unrelated to elephants is irrelephant
Anonymous
-
The problem with quotes on the internet is that you can never tell if they're genuine
Winston Churchill, 1944
-
Never argue with a fool. Onlookers may not be able to tell the difference.
Mark Twain
|
|
|
|
|
I just filled my Bingo card.
|
|
|
|
|
Hi all,
like the subject states...
In our printers we always used the original toner cartridges, they cost a small fortune compared to the compatible ones from "who knows their brand"...
Do you always use the original ones (same brand from the printer itself)?
If you use the non original ones... what has been your experience?
Thank you all!
|
|
|
|
|
Compatibles - but I'm only on my second set of toners anyway, so ...
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
"Common sense is so rare these days, it should be classified as a super power" - Random T-shirt
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
Me too, same Samsung laserprinter, similar experience with compatible cartridges, no problems so far 
|
|
|
|
|
I use originals, but since I only replace the toner about once every year or so, it's not a big issue
Freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two make four. If that is granted, all else follows.
-- 6079 Smith W.
|
|
|
|
|
I replace them maybe all 3 or 4 years and I'm pretty surprised that everything works well 
|
|
|
|
|
My mono I used knockoffs and had good luck with them.
A while back I got a color laser printer and haven't yet had to replace but I'm sure I can't afford the originals.
The less you need, the more you have.
Even a blind squirrel gets a nut...occasionally.
JaxCoder.com
|
|
|
|
|
I think if you compare it to the cost of inkjet even originals work out cheaper unless you are printing quite often - the number of inkjet cartridges I threw away because they dried out a bit and just wouldn't purge properly ever again ...
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
"Common sense is so rare these days, it should be classified as a super power" - Random T-shirt
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
I haven't had an inkjet printer in many moons because of the problems I had with not using them often.
Lasers are so cheap and more economical in the long run.
The less you need, the more you have.
Even a blind squirrel gets a nut...occasionally.
JaxCoder.com
|
|
|
|
|
Yep. Inkjet: turn it on, swear for half an hour, change one or more cartrigdes, swear, purge, swear, print, swear lots, repeat until you need to order more cartridges.
Laser: turn it on. Print. Turn it off.
No contest!
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
"Common sense is so rare these days, it should be classified as a super power" - Random T-shirt
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
The only problem I had with my previous mono laser was that, if I remember correctly the manufacturer had a peephole that it used to measure toner and I had to put a piece of tape over it to be able to use the remaining toner. It wasn't completely empty!
The less you need, the more you have.
Even a blind squirrel gets a nut...occasionally.
JaxCoder.com
|
|
|
|
|
The only reason I still have an inkjet printer is that I print on a CD surface every once in a blue moon. And incidentally, because of that, every time I need to do so my blood pressure rises. Meanwhile, my two lasers (one mono, one color) just keep going.
I've looked around. Printing on CDs with laser is just not feasible. Or at least, nobody's working on that problem.
|
|
|
|
|
If I manage to get my act together, picking up my old hobby of photography, I need to buy a new printer. Photo printing takes a lot of ink. A friend of mine pointed out that Epson makes a series of printers that do not use cartridges, but have a tank that is filled from fairly large bottles. My friend claims that this has reduced his ink costs dramatically. (Look for the term EcoTank at Epson's web pages to get more information. I believe that there are other printer manufacturers with similar solutions, but Epson is a well recognized name in printers!) The photo quality is excellent, when printing on high quality photo paper. It is somewhat dependent on paper quality, though: Photos on plain typewriter paper are not what you would send to a photo exhibition. I guess lasers are similar.
My impression is that most tests show inkjets to generally provide better photo quality than lasers. Professional photographers (and photo labs, to the degree they still exist) generally use inkjets. You will find a greater selection of large format inkjets than in lasers. To make photo prints of suitable size to hang on a wall, I will probably by an A3 size one - or rather, one that can handle both precut sheets and rolls of A3-short-edge width to print, say, a 30 by 80 cm panorama image.
Things may have changed about the photo quality of laser printers. I'd gladly take references to newer tests of laser vs. inkjet printout quality, preferably in A3 size. Are there laser printers that can handle continuous paper rolls? I can't remember ever seeing any.
I guess I am aiming for the upper end of home/amateur printers, bordering to the semi-pro. Still, the printers are not that expensive. The ink savings are so significant that it pays back even if you have other hobbies besides photography ...  If your photo hobby is currently at a low, the ink cost of printing a dummy page every week or so to keep the nozzles open, is so small that it won't ruin you.
I haven't yet settled on a printer model. If you know of any laser printer that could be an alternative to those bottle-fed Epsons, there is still time to affect my choice!
|
|
|
|
|
I bought new inkjets since they cheaper than cartridge's. That's ages ago, I just stopped printing.
Bastard Programmer from Hell 
"If you just follow the bacon Eddy, wherever it leads you, then you won't have to think about politics." -- Some Bell.
|
|
|
|
|
I've always used generic replacements without a problem. However, as a personal user, I don't use enough to tell if there's a difference.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
