 |
|
|
leppie wrote: Cygwin, just SEGFAULTS
heh. Glad I have a proper unix style shell, none of that cygwin nonsense.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I've had no issues with either the MSys or CygWIn variants. Maybe I'm just lucky.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Are you saying that Windows is a git?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
http://dreamhost.com/[^]
I can't really offer advice on how "secure" it is, however it is a "shared hosting" webhost which also overs subversion hosting with thier basic plan (as well as shell access). I use it for all my personal websites as well as all my personal coding projects.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Install Subversion on the cheapest server offered by these guys [^]and Bob's your Lobster.
"It's so simple to be wise. Just think of something stupid to say and then don't say it."
-Sam Levenson
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
i use svnrepository.com
simple and reliable and pretty cheap
"mostly watching the human race is like watching dogs watch tv ... they see the pictures move but the meaning escapes them"
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hans Dietrich wrote: "The only search engine that deletes your personal data."
Yet, it gave me a cookie 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
What harm? It isn't "private" data.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hans Dietrich wrote: "The only search engine that deletes your personal data."
Ah yes, that should serve my secret, diabolical purposes magnificently...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
http://it.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=08/07/14/1852203&from=rss[^]
snydeq writes
"Kris Kaspersky will demonstrate how attackers can target flaws in Intel microprocessors to remotely attack a computer using JavaScript or TCP/IP packets, regardless of OS. The demo will be presented at the Hack In The Box Security Conference in Kuala Lumpur in October and will show how processor bugs can be exploited using certain instruction sequences and a knowledge of how Java compilers work, allowing an attacker to take control of the compiler. The demonstrated attack will be made against fully patched computers running a range of OSes, including Windows XP, Vista, Windows Server 2003, Windows Server 2008, Linux, and BSD. An attack against a Mac is also a possibility."
dear friends
Who have this Attack code .Please send zhq_0_0_0_1@163.com .
Very grateful
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hmm...I'm dubious. I'll believe it when I see it. Firstly, if he's using javascript, it's running in a runtime of some kind, so all that's required to fix it is a minor change to the runtime to generate different assembly instructions. What are the chances that all the different JavaScript implementations (IE, firefox, safari, etc) all generate exactly the same assembly on different platforms. Maybe in theory it's possible, it's the cross platform bit I have trouble believing.
Simon
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kris Kaperski has the code. Simple.
If anybody else had the code, there would be practically no point to his proposed demonstration of the code
ChinaTJBoy wrote: at the Hack In The Box Security Conference in Kuala Lumpur in October
But if you're desperate, (and seriously think you'll get anywhere) why not ask him yourself. He goes by the username of nezumi over at OpenRCE.org
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ChinaTJBoy wrote: dear friends
Who have this Attack code .Please send zhq_0_0_0_1@163.com .
Very grateful
I didn't notice that request at the bottom. Don't be stupid. No one is going to give you malicious code, even if they had it, which they don't. 
Simon
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Simon Stevens wrote: Don't be stupid.
Too late for that...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ChinaTJBoy wrote: d a knowledge of how Java compilers work, allowing an attacker to take control of the compiler.
You show me a java compiler running on barebones hardware...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Party pooper!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
That's what I thought 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
peterchen wrote: or yours
Oh, I'm definitely a troll.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
please i need attack code
URGENT!!!!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Just downloaded and installed IE 8 beta to check out the companies web site with it. during the installation it tells you what it's doing. Step 2 is "Checking for malicious software' Why do the IE 8 team feel the need to do this? IE 8 is a browser, not a virus scanner.  Next thing we'll have the office 2010 installation "Scanning for illegally downloaded music...490235423 files found...Reporting to RIAA...Starting lawsuit"
Simon
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
That was probably the same as what IE7 does ... which is use this:
Malicious Software Removal Tool[^]
And your right it's a browser not a malware scanner, but with all the stupid/incompitant users around it seems like a prudent step to include one 
Are you sure you didn't agree to using the malware scanner during install? iirc IE7 does ask you before it does so.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
originSH wrote: Are you sure you didn't agree to using the malware scanner during install? iirc IE7 does ask you before it does so.
Probably, I'll admit to just clicking through the dialogs quite quickly
It just made me laugh.
Simon
|
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Question 
Answer 
Joke 
Rant 
Admin 
