 |
|
|
|
|
|
It's quit bizarre that you just 'Ran into' this when your profile says you work for the same company that runs it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
After poking around that site, they seem to have at least two other "search engines". As far as I can tell this is one guy, trying to get a few bucks in adsense.
Helpwithdotnet.com is registered anonymously, but the other two, searchprivateequity.com and searchnanotech.net, have the same whois info:
Registrant:
Connect Markets
Unit 116
675 Park Crescent
New Westminster, British Columbia V3L 5W4
Canada
Registered through: GoDaddy.com, Inc. (http: Domain Name: SEARCHPRIVATEEQUITY.COM
Created on: 11-Dec-07
Expires on: 11-Dec-10
Last Updated on: 19-Dec-07
Administrative Contact:
Gandhi, Nitin ngandhi@shaw.ca
Connect Markets
Unit 116
675 Park Crescent
New Westminster, British Columbia V3L 5W4
Canada
(602) 720-3544
Technical Contact:
Gandhi, Nitin ngandhi@shaw.ca
Connect Markets
Unit 116
675 Park Crescent
New Westminster, British Columbia V3L 5W4
Canada
(602) 720-3544
Domain servers in listed order:
NS19.DOMAINCONTROL.COM
NS20.DOMAINCONTROL.COM
Eric Haskins KC9JVH
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Good catch there. Looks like a scam.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Well, that's interesting. I did several whois on the site and nothing really came up.
"Not only do you continue to babble nonsense, you can't even correctly remember the nonsense you babbled just minutes ago." - Rob Graham
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paul Conrad wrote: I really wonder about artwork sometimes.
Art is sh*t. There's a sig for somebody.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Precisely so. 
"The clue train passed his station without stopping." - John Simmons / outlaw programmer
"Real programmers just throw a bunch of 1s and 0s at the computer to see what sticks" - Pete O'Hanlon
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pete O'Hanlon wrote: Subject:OK - here's a headline you won't hear very often
In fact, yours is the 3rd repost I believe 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repost... 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shame, but I didn't see the original posts.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pete O'Hanlon wrote: didn't see the original posts.
Me neither. Looked through all the posts in the last six months. Jumping on the repost bandwagon should be exercised with care, such as a clickety to the original post 
"The clue train passed his station without stopping." - John Simmons / outlaw programmer
"Real programmers just throw a bunch of 1s and 0s at the computer to see what sticks" - Pete O'Hanlon
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
It really is a repost..from earlier this week I believe. I can't remember the title of the thread. I know I made a comment of I can't believe what is considered art these days.
Blog link to be reinstated at a later date.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
My Paranoid Hubby wrote: It really is a repost..
I'll take your word for it.
My Paranoid Hubby wrote: can't believe what is considered art these days
Yeah, some of it is rather weird or stupid.
"The clue train passed his station without stopping." - John Simmons / outlaw programmer
"Real programmers just throw a bunch of 1s and 0s at the computer to see what sticks" - Pete O'Hanlon
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Well, I found it from Kent's post[^]....
---modified
Wonder why Pete would repost it after he replied in that particular thread. He must've forgot.
"The clue train passed his station without stopping." - John Simmons / outlaw programmer
"Real programmers just throw a bunch of 1s and 0s at the computer to see what sticks" - Pete O'Hanlon
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paul Conrad wrote: Wonder why Pete would repost it after he replied in that particular thread.
Because Pete didn't read the full thread. He came into it at Mr Clifton's post - which was too scatalogical to resist.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I figured it must have been something along those lines. Yes, any post by Marc can be hard to resist replying to 
"The clue train passed his station without stopping." - John Simmons / outlaw programmer
"Real programmers just throw a bunch of 1s and 0s at the computer to see what sticks" - Pete O'Hanlon
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maybe a repost, but still hugely funny. Thanks!
/ravi
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
My wife and I have purchased a notebook yesterday and we would like to install Vista. Laptop comes with Core 2 Duo 1.8Ghz CPU and 3Gb of Ram. Which version of vista do you recommend? 32 bit or 64? Is SP1 worth installing? It will be mainly used by my wife and very rarely by me for development tasks. Can you recommend intermediate level articles for migrating from XP to Vista? Any guides for me about developing applications that target vista and/or 64bit machines?
Thanks in advance.
Giorgi Dalakishvili #region signature my articles#endregion
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Giorgi Dalakishvili wrote: Which version of vista do you recommend? 32 bit or 64?
With 3 Gb of RAM I recommend the 32-bit version, unless you plan to add more RAM in the future.
Giorgi Dalakishvili wrote: Is SP1 worth installing?
Yes.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hi Giorgi,
I definitely recommend to install SP1.
If you do not need to run 64bit programs, 32bit version is just fine. Of course if you want to develop 64bit app for som reason 64bit version is way to go.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I'm running 32-bit Vista Ultimate with 1.5GB ram and does just fine once I tweaked which services and background processes I want running (i.e. disk indexing was turned off since I keep files in a centralized location on the machine and they are easy for me to find).
"The clue train passed his station without stopping." - John Simmons / outlaw programmer
"Real programmers just throw a bunch of 1s and 0s at the computer to see what sticks" - Pete O'Hanlon
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yup - it's the tweaking that makes the difference. BTW - how was Clone Wars?
|
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Question 
Answer 
Joke 
Rant 
Admin 
