 |
|
 |
10) Social Security Number 11) Credit cards numbers 12) Bank account numbers 13) Date of Birth 14) Home address ...
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
 |
|
 |
1. Ackhmed ebn Josoof-AlHamir ebn Mustaffa ebn Moahmar ebn Salhaadin. 2. Taliban-Tigers Radical Wing – bomb division. 3. ttigers@alahackbar.afg 4. frequency - 478.6 USW, call sign: “Monster” 5. Depends how it is going with the kidnapping business in the particular year… 6. Robbery, bombing, shooting – stuffs like this/what is your address? Just curiosity/. 7. When I’m setting an ambush it could take 24 hours. 8. No exactly a school, but 4 years in a desert training camp. 9. Previous sentences and 5+ years in a Turkish prison are considered as advantage. 10. At least 4 hours in the shooting range every week are essential for practicing my occupation.
BTW: Did you already send me your address?
The narrow specialist in the broad sense of the word is a complete idiot in the narrow sense of the word.
Advertise here – minimum three posts per day are guaranteed.
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
If I find time later in the day I can do this.
John
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
A few observations about question #4.
Shouldn't the year be mentioned? I mean one would have a much lower starting salary if they were hired in 1975 than 2008. Also there is no 30,000 to 40,000 category. And this probably should specify the currency as well unless you only want US entries.
John
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
I edited the survey to make the corrections that you pointed out.
Thanks very much for taking the time to offer your information.
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
 |
|
 |
You complete B@$7@&£
I am now sitting humming 'The Floral Dance'.
------------------------------------
We hang the petty thieves and appoint the great ones to public office. - Aesop
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
Muahahahaha!
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
1. Open desk drawer. 2. Place head in said desk. 3. Slam draw on head. 4. Repeat step 1 and 3 until urge to hum Floral Dance goes away.
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
"But listeners may also detect my croaking in the background and wonder if it's a rumbling of the stomach."
Listeners? That's optimistic. 
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
Nooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
 |
|
 |
I've just spent about a hour trying to figure out why my assembly didn't seem to be visible from VB6. It compiled fine. I had all the required attributes on the various classes. I ticked the "Register for COM interop" box on the properties page. Regasm ran fine with no errors, but it just didn't work. I started doing a file by file comparison with an assembly that did work when I spotted this. [assembly: ComVisible(false)] Dammit.
Simon
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
Simon Stevens wrote: I've just spent about a hour trying to figure out why my assembly didn't seem to be visible from VB6.
Thanks for the tip. You still doing UI in VB6? Are you working for Japanese car or related company?
Best regards, Paul.
Jesus Christ is LOVE! Please tell somebody.
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
Paul Selormey wrote: Are you working for Japanese car or related company?
What do Japanese cars have to do with VB6?
Simon
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
Simon Stevens wrote: What do Japanese cars have to do with VB6?
He's possibly implying that VB6 lets the developer focus on the actual requirement rather than spend hours figuring out some UI glitch, and thus Honda, Nissan and Toyota actually make good running stable cars. Whereas Ford, Saturn and Dodge use Interpreted Basic and a hand rolled UI library which results in the so called toy cars that stop running after 50K miles or 4 years.
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
Good job VB6 didn't see it what on earth was you doing in VB6
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
Norm .net wrote: what on earth was you doing in VB6
One word - Legacy.
We have an old app that is VB6. I set the policy when I joined the company that all new code is written in .net, but I can't quite justify a re-write of the whole app in .net. It'll happen eventually, probably when someone requests an large improvement that pretty much constitutes a rewrite. It's about 70% .net code now anyway. Pretty much only the GUI, and some dodgy comms with a few of the older pieces of hardware is left in VB.
Simon
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
Our deep sympathies go out to you and your team-mates
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
I'm in same boat. Large VB6 app, 392 VB6 source code files not even including the ones that make up the various DLLs it calls written in a mixture of VB6 and FoxPro, which makes it up to several thousand. We've probably got about a fifth of it moved over to .NET but hard to really know for sure.
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
I had exactly the same issue a couple of weeks ago. I have no idea why setting the "Register for COM interop" checkbox doesn't change this value.
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
Essentially, this was a pointless news item. The headline (in the newsletter) suggested that Komodo would serve as an alternative IDE. Since the VAST majority of us here use Visual Studio in some flavor, I assumed that the article was vetted to the point that the casual reader would assume that "alternative" meant a possible replacement to Visual Studio.
This is NOT the case. If you do *any* .Net stuff, don't even bother with reading the linked article.
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997 ----- "...the staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - Jason Jystad, 10/26/2001
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
The irony of the article. A first look article without any pictures.
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
John Simmons / outlaw programmer wrote: This is NOT the case. If you do *any* .Net stuff, don't even bother with reading the linked article.
Too late for me.
|
|
|
|
 |