 |
|
|
There are so many none-KSS jokes I could come up with here. I don't even want to consider where the water hazards are.
"WPF has many lovers. It's a veritable porn star!" - Josh Smith As Braveheart once said, "You can take our freedom but you'll never take our Hobnobs!" - Martin Hughes.
My blog | My articles | MoXAML PowerToys | Onyx
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Waiting for a blackjack table bra.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
so go ahead and hit me while I'm double down 
Steve
_________________
I C(++) therefore I am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This would be a 7 hole golf course though  (could not stop posting this)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
...from Google - Go[^]
Apologies if repost.
Kevin
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kevin McFarlane wrote: ...from Google - Go[^]
Apologies if repost.
Apologies accepted[^]
“Follow your bliss.” – Joseph Campbell
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cheers. I went back a few pages before posting but not far enough!
Kevin
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Try thread view; they're on the same page.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Didn't even know about that!  You learn something new every day.
Kevin
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Just what the world needs, another ALGOL based multi-paradigm, imperative, functional, generic, object-oriented language.
Can't we all just settle on COBOL and be done with it?
------------------------------------
In science, 'fact' can only mean 'confirmed to such a degree that it would be perverse to withhold provisional assent.' I suppose that apples might start to rise tomorrow, but the possibility does not merit equal time in physics classrooms. Stephen J Gould
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I can see you've already blown my lunchtime reading for today
Looks interesting, thanks for the link!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Go is only part of it's name. The rest of it is rather obscene, and biologically very tricky, except for those who are very, very blessed.
"WPF has many lovers. It's a veritable porn star!" - Josh Smith As Braveheart once said, "You can take our freedom but you'll never take our Hobnobs!" - Martin Hughes.
My blog | My articles | MoXAML PowerToys | Onyx
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Go page tells us it's only supported on the Mac OS and Linux. I can't help feeling like they forgot something...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Heh. Love the Pascal assignment operator!
/ravi
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A programmingcommenting question.
I have been writing commentaries above a related line of code, like this:
Init();
However, I have seen a big sample of code written by one of my professors recently. The commentaries was placed below a line.
Init();
Sincerely, I have found it very clear and understable. Did anybody encounter such approach to commenting code? Is it recommended?
Greetings - Jacek
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If it's a small comment, you could even do this:
Init();
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Some people can't see with wood from the trees
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Or even better, rename the function so you don't need the comment.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
That's right.
The old 'self documenting code' joke is not always a joke.
Take time and space to make variable names mean something.
Make the method name be really indicative of what it does.
I use long, descriptive variable and method names, and my experience is that they are more likely to stay up to date than the comments are, and less likely to be re-used in an inappropriate manner. 'int i;' will get used/reused on demand, but 'int windowIdx; will generally only be used for the index of a window, into a list of windows.
But comments are required where the code can not be made easy to understand, because it is actually very complex algorithm, it has been optimized, or for some other reason obfuscated.
Silver member by constant and unflinching longevity.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
above
Humans read downwards and we want to know what you intend to do (comment) before we read what you are doing (code).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Above or on the same line, but never below.
“Follow your bliss.” – Joseph Campbell
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comments below the line of code?
Sure, if you're the sort of person who wears their underpants on top of their trousers.
"People who don't like their beliefs being laughed at shouldn't have such funny beliefs." ~ Anon
"If you can't explain it simply, you don't understand it well enough" ~ Albert Einstein
Currently reading: 'The Greatest Show on Earth', by Richard Dawkins.
|
|
|
|
|
go over and your busted 
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Rant 
Admin