 |
|
By that logic, if you purge him with fire then no more would spring up?
|
|
|
|
|
You gotta make sure you get the root. If you don't, you'll be fighting the same battle twice again.
".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010
-----
You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010
-----
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nish Sivakumar wrote: At USD 2100, it's not cheap
Especially without lens.
~RaGE();
I think words like 'destiny' are a way of trying to find order where none exists. - Christian Graus
Do not feed the troll ! - Common proverb
|
|
|
|
|
They have a 600-dollar FX zoom now. The 24-85mm f/3.5-4.5G VR. So for under 3000, you can get an FX camera/lens combo which would have been unthinkable a few years back.
|
|
|
|
|
What is actually the difference between this one and D7000 ( I am not enough into the subject to understand the price difference) ?
~RaGE();
I think words like 'destiny' are a way of trying to find order where none exists. - Christian Graus
Do not feed the troll ! - Common proverb
|
|
|
|
|
The D7000 has a DX sensor, while the D600 has an FX sensor. The FX sensor is the digital equivalent of the 35 mm film format. The DX sensor is a cropped (2/3rd) sensor (relative to 35 mm). That accounts for the price difference.
|
|
|
|
|
Bleah.
I wanna Lytro, but they won't send them to Europe, so bollocks to their profits and sales figures.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
I think I want a Lytro, too, but I'm definitely not bleah'ing this. This is huuge for film makers on a budget. It's not so much about photography.
|
|
|
|
|
If I wait a while I should be able to rob one off a tourist in the street.
---------------------------------
I will never again mention that I was the poster of the One Millionth Lounge Post, nor that it was complete drivel. Dalek Dave
CCC Link[ ^]
|
|
|
|
|
Dalek Dave wrote: If I wait a while I should be able to rob one off a tourist in the street.
You moved to Italy?
|
|
|
|
|
Get many Tourists in Luton then?
|
|
|
|
|
I know of at least one who pops in from time to time 
---------------------------------
I will never again mention that I was the poster of the One Millionth Lounge Post, nor that it was complete drivel. Dalek Dave
CCC Link[ ^]
|
|
|
|
|
|
Get a old D700 ... better in most aspects, especially micro lens focus adjustments which is essential with a fullframe camera that can generate thinner depth of field that display lens slight focussing imperfections..
Heck, an old D2(x) might be better .
Watched code never compiles.
|
|
|
|
|
D600 might be a better choice than D700 for most poeople given 700 doesn't do video. Otherwise, better auto focus would tilt the scales (if it is true).
|
|
|
|
|
With any luck Canon will fire another shot at Nikon and we will have a price war.
|
|
|
|
|
Ennis Ray Lynch, Jr. wrote: With any luck Canon will fire another shot at Nikon and we will have a price war
Rumor is that Canon will release 6D with the same sensor as 5D Mark II (or 5D Mark III).
|
|
|
|
|
Been a lot of anticipation since the D800 came out to see what they would do with this.
Still a little to expensive for me but can always hope Santa is good this year?
|
|
|
|
|
The only problem with that logic is that I am Santa around here. 
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nish Sivakumar wrote: it's the first full-frame digital SLR that's ever been released for a sub-2900
price
Sorry, you are wrong.. The first full frame DSLR under $2000 is Sony A850. It was released with an MSRP of $1999. It was a good DSLR (good color - though high ISO performance is not that great) and released sometime in 2009. It was a the scaled down version (less FPS, 98% view finder) of Sony A900.
Also when the last generations of Full Frame DSLRs released, the price point was around $2700. I remeber Canon 5D Mark II was $2699 or $2799. Same is the case for Sony A900 and Nikon D700.
-Madhu
|
|
|
|
|
The Nikon D700 debuted at 2999 if I remember right. I am sorry if I missed the Canons and the Sonys. Strictly a Nikon guy here.
|
|
|
|
|
Nish Sivakumar wrote: The Nikon D700 debuted at 2999 if I remember right
That might be true, but I saw them selling $2700 range within a couple of months of its release.
Regarding Canon 5D Mark II, it was released with $2700 range. I bought it $2699 within 6 months after its release.
My main point was Nikon D600 is not the least expensive full frame DSLR that is released.
-Madhu
|
|
|
|
|
Madhu Cheriyedath wrote:
My main point was Nikon D600 is not the least expensive full frame DSLR that
is released.
I won't disagree, but it's the cheapest Nikon FX camera ever released. Not sure how many DX people will move to this one though, since buying lenses will prove to be quite expensive.
|
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
Post your Blog
