 |

|
My fight clip at 155 lbs. Here it is![^]
If it moves, compile it
|
|
|
|
|

|
took a lot of training to get me to keep my posture when I fight. The reason he was getting takedowns is because I let him back me up against the cage. I don't think it was too bad for my first fight. It took about half the round to get my bearings.
If it moves, compile it
|
|
|
|

|
oh goodness - for your first fight you should be very pleased with yourself
Bryce
|
|
|
|

|
I am pleased You can tell when I started to get my bearings later in the first round.
If it moves, compile it
|
|
|
|

|
Curious Steve, do you do this for the pride? Or for the price?
dev
|
|
|
|

|
Ammy fighters don't get paid here, so it's a very expensive hobby
I do it for several reasons. I got into it on my way to getting healthy and losing weight. I think when it started I had a lot to prove. Now it's just testing myself and my training more than anything. Pride and the competition are two good reasons , yeah.
If it moves, compile it
|
|
|
|

|
loctrice wrote: Ammy fighters don't get paid here, so it's a very expensive painful hobby
FTFY
Bryce
|
|
|
|

|
alright Steve, you're the Man!
dev
|
|
|
|

|
Thanks!
If it moves, compile it
|
|
|
|

|
Congrats on the win dude!
"Any sort of work in VB6 is bound to provide several WTF moments." - Christian Graus
|
|
|
|

|
Thank you!
If it moves, compile it
|
|
|
|

|
Congrats on the win, you really kept your composure.
|
|
|
|

|
Thanks!
If it moves, compile it
|
|
|
|

|
Congrats !
I think the right you punched him at 5:14 (of the video) was the beginning of the end for him.
Plus he did not seem to want to fight a lot, was always attempting at grabbing you...
Well done !
~RaGE();
I think words like 'destiny' are a way of trying to find order where none exists. - Christian Graus
Do not feed the troll ! - Common proverb
|
|
|
|

|
yes, but when I started gaining position he just stood back up. And then he wouldn't come in and attack, but he wouldn't let me up either. That is a good tactic I guess, unless there is a crowd there and a time limit.
Not taking anything away from him. I appreciate him competing and being an athlete, and it wasn't easy. I was just commenting.
If it moves, compile it
|
|
|
|

|
I agree with Rage, it looks like around the 5 minute mark of the video, the punches caught up with him. I thought at 4:58 you were going to just finish him coming out of that little grapple, you just did it a minute later. If he improves his conditioning, he's going to give you a tougher fight next time. That body slam he put on you was pretty crazy looking though.
|
|
|
|

|
That depends on how you look at it. He did do some flashy slams, but he was not able to get the position on me after he got me down. After a minute when I started gaining position he let go and stood up. He was definately getting the points if it went to decision, however I don't feel like I lost control at any point other than when I was getting slammed. If he stayed down with me, I feel like I would have done ok, though it's hard to tell cause the fight didn't go that way. Anything I could say would just be guessing based on what happened.
Either way, I won't take so long getting my feet down next time. Was a good first fight. I wanted to strike with him, and that's what we ended up doing.
If it moves, compile it
|
|
|
|

|
to post links to download software under creative common licences in CP?
I don't want to make spam, it was to answer a user in the QA
Regards.
--------
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpfull answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|

|
If you are answering a question in QA I think you can post anything as long a it is helpful. This question should probably be asked in bugs and suggestions.
|
|
|
|

|
CP also has a forum for Free Tools[^] where you can post links to tools you think are useful to the community.
"It was when I found out I could make mistakes that I knew I was on to something."
-Ornette Coleman
"Philosophy is a study that lets us be unhappy more intelligently."
-Anon.
|
|
|
|

|
I know about the Free Tools forum, thank you
Regards.
--------
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpfull answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|

|
I am sometimes irked by the poverty of content of some error messages (including mine), but I consider that those related to e-mails deserve a special mention.
Here is a cool example of the info you get in return when sending a mail with several attachments of different kinds. The messages are provided in two separate files.
The best of the story is that you are not just bombarded with all that useless crap, you also don't get any clue about the things that really matter to you: 1) what file or file extension was blocked ? 2) was the message delivered at all ?
Do you share my outrage ?
Details.txt
Reporting-MTA: dns; sif.is.somename.be
Received-From-MTA: DNS; ip-08-326-426-352.dsl.somename.be
Arrival-Date: Sun, 11 Nov 2012 18:26:52 +0100
Final-Recipient: RFC822; somename.somename@somename.com
Action: failed
Status: 5.0.0
Remote-MTA: DNS; smtp01.somename.com
Diagnostic-Code: SMTP; 554 rejecting banned file attachment
Last-Attempt-Date: Sun, 11 Nov 2012 18:28:28 +0100
Untitled attachment 00048.txt
Return-Path: <somename.somename@somename.be>
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=scarlet.be;
s=somename; t=1783485265;
bh=pNZZ7y37RaEuaSunmiNVkAmAdBTYyaaW2I5mIFbfs+E=;
h=From:To:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:
MIME-Version:Content-Type;
b=oghqdfjImg566ffDDEcpulB98NArEpkAsm/BpWbn7cgmOl9VpHggkfRc7NCtIy9AfcR6
oyk91sGuW/GxZtPRbYU6ixqRhHYkrb32feRLne3i7tvxha1plWO0YkvL+uLG+zU1vM
l6li491upcYcBRKPhr/z612zl3WDzDns0hJwXywE=
Received: from somename (ip-98-658-223-501.dsl.somename.be [56.665.298.778])
(authenticated bits=0)
by sif.is.somename.be (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id qAB22HQrtD0190
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT)
for <somename.somename@somename.com>; Sun, 11 Nov 2012 18:26:52 +0100
X-Scarlet: u=tsj02451 d=1352654812 c=80.236.246.122
From: "somename.somename" <somename.somename@somename.be>
To: "somename.somename" <somename.somename@somename.com>
References:
In-Reply-To:
Subject: FW: Dongle support
Date: Sun, 11 Nov 2012 18:26:51 +0100
Message-ID: <001336cdc03137cdaf$bd658dd0$70$@somename.be>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed;
boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0019_01CBD03A.1F08F7D0"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: Ac3AKyA2kDFD36rrfj556gg5GfQCdhwABkaOg
Content-Language: en-us
X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 111231-0, 12/31/2011), Outbound message
X-Antivirus-Status: Clean
X-DCC-somename.be-Metrics: sif 20001; Body=1 Fuz1=1 Fuz2=1
X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.97.1-exp at sif
X-Virus-Status: Clean
|
|
|
|

|
Not really.
The error is pretty obvious. One, or more, of your attachments is not allowed. This is probably an .exe or some script file, i.e. anything exectuable.
When you get an error like this, your message is just about never delivered.
|
|
|
|

|
What about an error message like The attached file 'Attach.exe' was rejected for security reasons. The message was not delivered. ? Would that be too much human-like ?
|
|
|
|
 |