Click here to Skip to main content

Welcome to the Lounge

   

For lazing about and discussing anything in a software developer's life that takes your fancy.
The Lounge is rated PG. If you're about to post something you wouldn't want your kid sister to read then don't post it. No flame wars, no abusive conduct and please don't post ads.

Technical discussions are welcome, but if you need specific help please use the programming forums.


 
GeneralRe: How Difficult Would It Be? Pinmemberjschell11-Dec-12 10:40 
GeneralRe: How Difficult Would It Be? PinmemberDan Neely10-Dec-12 10:21 
GeneralRe: How Difficult Would It Be? PinmemberZac Greve10-Dec-12 10:22 
GeneralRe: How Difficult Would It Be? PinmemberRoger Wright10-Dec-12 11:17 
GeneralRe: How Difficult Would It Be? Pinmemberwizardzz11-Dec-12 7:07 
GeneralRe: How Difficult Would It Be? PinmemberRoger Wright11-Dec-12 19:28 
GeneralRe: How Difficult Would It Be? PinmemberBrady Kelly10-Dec-12 7:27 
GeneralRe: How Difficult Would It Be? PinmemberLloyd Atkinson10-Dec-12 10:18 
GeneralRe: How Difficult Would It Be? Pinmember_Maxxx_10-Dec-12 17:52 
GeneralA revisit to "that" prank call PinprotectorPete O'Hanlon10-Dec-12 6:43 
GeneralRe: A revisit to "that" prank call PinmemberDalek Dave10-Dec-12 6:47 
GeneralRe: A revisit to "that" prank call Pinmemberbryce10-Dec-12 13:58 
GeneralRe: A revisit to "that" prank call PinmemberSimon_Whale10-Dec-12 6:53 
GeneralRe: A revisit to "that" prank call PinmvpRichard MacCutchan10-Dec-12 7:02 
Given the number of these that have been done over the last few years and the furore and upset they have caused, I think they were pretty irresponsible, and so was the station management. They knew nothing about this nurse and lied to her in order to get information that they knew was not supposed to be made public.
 
However,
Pete O'Hanlon wrote:
They do not deserve the ordeal that they are being put through.
I tend to agree, they are being humiliated almost as much.
One of these days I'm going to think of a really clever signature.

GeneralRe: A revisit to "that" prank call PinprotectorAspDotNetDev10-Dec-12 7:03 
GeneralRe: A revisit to "that" prank call PinmvpNish Sivakumar10-Dec-12 7:31 
GeneralRe: A revisit to "that" prank call PinprotectorAspDotNetDev10-Dec-12 7:37 
GeneralRe: A revisit to "that" prank call PinmvpNish Sivakumar10-Dec-12 7:38 
GeneralRe: A revisit to "that" prank call PinprotectorAspDotNetDev10-Dec-12 7:45 
GeneralRe: A revisit to "that" prank call PinmemberChrisElston10-Dec-12 9:35 
GeneralRe: A revisit to "that" prank call PinmvpOriginalGriff10-Dec-12 9:45 
GeneralRe: A revisit to "that" prank call PinprotectorAspDotNetDev10-Dec-12 10:02 
GeneralRe: A revisit to "that" prank call PinmemberPHS24110-Dec-12 7:18 
GeneralRe: A revisit to "that" prank call PinmemberSlacker00710-Dec-12 7:20 
GeneralRe: A revisit to "that" prank call PinmvpNish Sivakumar10-Dec-12 7:33 
GeneralRe: A revisit to "that" prank call PinmemberThe Reincarnation11-Dec-12 2:21 
GeneralRe: A revisit to "that" prank call PinmvpNish Sivakumar11-Dec-12 8:28 
GeneralRe: A revisit to "that" prank call Pinmemberhayrob10-Dec-12 7:51 
GeneralRe: A revisit to "that" prank call PinprotectorPete O'Hanlon10-Dec-12 8:17 
GeneralRe: A revisit to "that" prank call Pinmemberhayrob10-Dec-12 10:02 
GeneralRe: A revisit to "that" prank call PinprotectorPete O'Hanlon11-Dec-12 0:29 
GeneralRe: A revisit to "that" prank call Pinmemberhayrob11-Dec-12 0:32 
GeneralRe: A revisit to "that" prank call Pinmemberc242310-Dec-12 9:13 
GeneralRe: A revisit to "that" prank call PinmemberMike Mullikin10-Dec-12 9:15 
GeneralRe: A revisit to "that" prank call PinmemberMehGerbil10-Dec-12 9:24 
GeneralRe: A revisit to "that" prank call PinmemberChrisElston10-Dec-12 9:30 
GeneralRe: A revisit to "that" prank call PinmemberMehGerbil10-Dec-12 10:54 
GeneralRe: A revisit to "that" prank call Pinmemberjschell10-Dec-12 10:01 
GeneralRe: A revisit to "that" prank call PinmemberForogar17-Dec-12 8:48 
GeneralWho needs an Apache anyway? PinprotectorPete O'Hanlon10-Dec-12 6:17 
GeneralRe: Who needs an Apache anyway? PinmemberSlacker00710-Dec-12 6:20 
GeneralRe: Who needs an Apache anyway? PinmemberMaximilien10-Dec-12 7:43 
GeneralRe: Who needs an Apache anyway? PinmemberBrady Kelly10-Dec-12 7:46 
GeneralRe: Who needs an Apache anyway? PinmemberAlbert Holguin10-Dec-12 8:22 
GeneralRe: Who needs an Apache anyway? Pinmemberjeron110-Dec-12 8:28 
GeneralRe: Who needs an Apache anyway? PinmemberColin Mullikin10-Dec-12 9:32 
GeneralRe: Who needs an Apache anyway? PinmemberSoMad10-Dec-12 9:48 
GeneralRe: Who needs an Apache anyway? PinprotectorPete O'Hanlon10-Dec-12 9:50 
GeneralRe: Who needs an Apache anyway? PinmemberTheOtherCPian10-Dec-12 20:27 
GeneralRe: Who needs an Apache anyway? PinmemberBergholt Stuttley Johnson10-Dec-12 22:24 

General General    News News    Suggestion Suggestion    Question Question    Bug Bug    Answer Answer    Joke Joke    Rant Rant    Admin Admin   

Use Ctrl+Left/Right to switch messages, Ctrl+Up/Down to switch threads, Ctrl+Shift+Left/Right to switch pages.


Advertise | Privacy | Mobile
Web04 | 2.8.141220.1 | Last Updated 21 Dec 2014
Copyright © CodeProject, 1999-2014
All Rights Reserved. Terms of Service
Layout: fixed | fluid