Click here to Skip to main content
8,878,167 members and growing!
  
Email Password   Lost password?
Search within:



tiwarivishnu - Professional Profile

400
Author
1
Debator
5
Editor
2
Organiser
333
Participant
0
Authority
0
Enquirer
No Biography provided
Member since Wednesday, October 8, 2008 (3 years, 7 months)
Link: http://www.codeproject.com/Members/tiwarivishnu

Member No. 5588092

741 points

Architect, XXXX
United States United States
Articles 2 (Debut)
Tech Blogs 0
Messages 1 (Lurker)
Q&A Questions 0
Q&A Answers 0
Tips/Tricks 0
Comments 0
 

For more information on Reputation please see the FAQ.
 
You must Sign In to use this message board. (secure sign-in)
 
Search this forum  
  RefreshFirst Prev Next
GeneralSending EDI 997 Acknowledgement ONLY. Pin
Thursday, October 22, 2009 2:54 AM
The BizTalk EDI Implementation is receiving EDI 940 message [Warehouse shipping order] from partner. In response to this, BizTalk application needs to send EDI 997 message to the partner.
 
Problem: I was assuming that BizTalk EDI will send the 997 to the partner, without the configuring this party as receiver. The obvious reason was, when you start configuring the “Party as Interchange Receiver”, you need to set you do not see the EDI 997 GS and ST segment definition and when you try to set the “For ST1” from drop down you do not see EDI 997 and because of this I could not configure the party as receiver and due to this reason I was continuously getting below error.
 
X12 Message can not be serialized due to invalid party configuration for XXXX, 1st validation error has description ISA5: Data element too short
 
Note: The xml 997 was generating but it was failing at in the send pipeline. Assembler was trying to add the ISA and GS values, since the party was not configured as receiver, so assembler was not finding the ISA and GS info to add and it was throwing error i.e. ISA5: Data element too short.Later I found that ST1 field could be set to anything and this value will be overwritten EDI send pipeline with appropriate values. And this removes the error!!!
Sign In·View Thread·Permalink
Last Visit: 17:43 28 May '12     Last Update: 13:43 28 May '12 1

General General    News News    Suggestion Suggestion    Question Question    Bug Bug    Answer Answer    Joke Joke    Rant Rant    Admin Admin   


Advertise | Privacy | Mobile
Web01 | 2.5.120528.1 | Last Updated 28 May 2012
Copyright © CodeProject, 1999-2012
All Rights Reserved. Terms of Use
Layout: fixed | fluid