|
Well, resistance is futile. 
|
|
|
|
|
According to many psychologists we all remember everything we ever see. so what we really need is :-
100% retrieval of facts.
So come on Google - are you up for a real challenge!
|
|
|
|
|
|
I believe I would rather not know the 'top hit' on my search history being: Where'd I put my car keys?
Or, worse yet, bringing up link upon link of me surfing redtube. Although, that'd certainly save on my needing to pay for an ISP. 
No single raindrop believes it is to blame for the flood.
-irresponsibility@Despair.com
|
|
|
|
|
Title says it all. The kind of fuzzy associative memory I have now I next to useless.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Does it even have an OS?
All features I'd expect from an OS are missing.
|
|
|
|
|
I don't know, but I'm sure it was written using Liquid Nitrogen.
".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010
-----
You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010
-----
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
|
|
|
|
|
So I can render far away objects without having to use Crossfire glasses 
|
|
|
|
|
Give me all of the Dark side of THE FORCE powers and abilities and forget about the rest 
|
|
|
|
|
You'll still need a tray if you go to the canteen.
|
|
|
|
|
Increased short term Memory:Since the short term memory fades into the long term memory it's not clear whether his would make a noticable difference.
Faster processor speed:At least this would allow you to solve problems and be creative faster, although you might get frustrated waiting for your muscles to react!
Faster memory:Without the faster processor this is probably pointless.
More CPU cores / improve parallelism:You've probably already got several trillion processors and can multitask! What more do yoi need?
Faster acesss to long term storage:Same as faster memory.
Increased long term storage:I've never noticed a shortage! 
A more efficient OS:Seems quite efficient already!
A more feature-rich OS:I think telekinesis, telepathy and similar need additional hardware. The current OS probably does as much as it can with the existing peripherals!
A more reliable, robust and stable OS:Mine seems to recover quite well from hardware corruption!
A dual- or multi-boot system:Voluntarility become unconscious (asleep?) while someone else runs around with my body? No.
Other:Depends if you are limiting this the the brain or to the peripherals...
|
|
|
|
|
the problem of human brain that it can't do a real multitasking
|
|
|
|
|
You mean multi-task consciously!
It does multi-tasking just fine on subconscious chores, beat the heart, regulate blood pressure, drive the car while you are talking to your friend while digesting the pizza and removing poisons from the alcohol you had last night, adjusting your pupil according to the sunlight that just came from behind the cloud, send extra blood to your respected member in anticipation of good luck with the sexy girl you just saw across the room.
The list is almost endless.
|
|
|
|
|
I think all the discussion here is about conscious mind , any way, to put my point clear we can sort the brain action in two Category :
active creative thinking (tell your friend a story)
passive interacting thinking (Switching speed while driving)
you can not do two Parallel actions in the same category like: telling a story(creation) and listen to another story in the same time(learning),note that you can not bound the action in a one category saying it's absolutely passive or active.
I mean by passive action the action that the brain accustomed to do it without notable thinking like typing in keyboard for trained person.
but you are right when regarding subconscious brain the autonomic nervous system can perform thousands tasks in the same time from regulating blood pressure to digesting your pizza.
regards
|
|
|
|
|
I quite often carry on a conversation while answering emails or similar. When you add in the actions of typing and speaking plus all the 'subconscious' stuff that's going on, that's a pretting high level of multitasking or parallel processing.
Also many people hold conversations or listen to the radio while reading directions and driving.
But I have to agree that the's a limit of only 2 or 3 'active' tasks for the conscious mind.
I also have to agree that sometine the memory indexing is sluggish - e.g. remembering the name of someone you meet on the street 2 hours later!
But if I had to choose one item to change I still think it would have to be the faster processing speed as this would automatically improve the others.
|
|
|
|
|
Derek Dongray wrote: Increased long term storage:I've never noticed a shortage!
May be because you forgot it!
Derek Dongray wrote: Faster acesss to long term storage:Same as faster memory.
Not necessarily. It may mean just better indexing!
Derek Dongray wrote: A more efficient OS:Seems quite efficient already!
You cannot know (and will never know even if you upgrade ... if you use yourself as a measure).
It is like express a number in its own base. Will always be "10".
Derek Dongray wrote: A more reliable, robust and stable OS:Mine seems to recover quite well from hardware corruption!
... and if it doesn't you cannot answer!
2 bugs found.
> recompile ...
65534 bugs found.
|
|
|
|
|
AFAIK the brain is already a massively parallel processor, with dedicated circuits to vision recognition, audio recognition, social interactions and language processing - amongst many other tasks including motor-control.
Fact is, we already have orders of magnitude more parallelism than most, if not all, computers.
Guess that, once again, we have to blame the master programmer for this one.
PS. I went for a more feature-rich O/S. I want plenty of new, experimental and hopefully bug-ridden features to make for an interesting life.
|
|
|
|
|
Only if you are female. Men have only one processor/core (and guess what it does most of the time )
|
|
|
|
|
I just want to stop the voices.
Peter Wasser
|
|
|
|
|
|
Especially better compatibility with popular existing protocols!
|
|
|
|
|
My memory keeps losing packets!
What are we talking about? 
|
|
|
|
|
djj55 wrote: What are we talking about?
Your short term memory loss...
|
|
|
|
|
Memory??? When you are my age memory is a joke with many iterations.
Heck I don't know whether to click joke or rant.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
