|
|
It's the current standard that we use 1024 x 768 as the minimum screen resolution now. 640 x 480 and/or 800 x 600 resolution was that day when we heard and started learning Computers with DOS and then Windows 98. Life has changed, Technology too. I can't imagine a monitor less than 1024 px now. Yes, there are some people who are still using that, but should upgrade to a higher resolution if require.
|
|
|
|
|
windows 7 64-bit disk class filter driver ... it don't need no stinking screen
Be wary of strong drink. It can make you shoot at tax collectors - and miss.
Lazarus Long, "Time Enough For Love" by Robert A. Heinlein
modified 13-Dec-11 17:53pm.
|
|
|
|
|
Well, the system still needs to display Blue Screen Of Death when your driver crashes Windows 7, no? 
|
|
|
|
|
Our latest app works at every resolution, just not very handy.
However, since it's made for a specific customer who only uses pretty large monitors we've designed it for exactly that 
It's an OO world.
public class Naerling : Lazy<Person>{
public void DoWork(){ throw new NotImplementedException(); }
}
|
|
|
|
|
I was careful to make sure my app could be used at 640x480, as long as your Start menu is auto-hide. But it would not be a pleasant experience, with the "sidebar" taking up 2/3 of the screen by default and about 1/2 minimum.
I usually find I can design an app that can be used "in theory" at 640x480 and is only "slightly uncomfortable" at 800x600. Such an app will then be quite comfortable at 1024x768 and up. But, the visual design people are starting to come to me asking for bigger icons...
|
|
|
|
|
you have to leave 640x480 soon.. 
I DO What I LOVE to DO.
|
|
|
|
|
First off, I have dual 1280x1024 monitors, but that doesn't imply that my users do. Second, believe it or not, some people HAVE larger screens but prefer apps that are usable in "windowed mode" without consuming the entire screen.
modified 19-Dec-11 13:55pm.
|
|
|
|
|
Managing several websites, I thought to check my Google Analytics to see what real users actual use (at least when on the web).
I note that only ca. 2.5% use 800x600 or below (so I'll be upping my expected resolution), but I noted something more interesting (and alas, destructive towards the utility of this survey).
Then number of screen formats captured is 28, of which only a small sampling of which are represented by the survey, quite a few somewhat popular ones being omitted. For example, Some clearly indicate a vertical format [in terms of pixels], with 800 being the width. How does one vote this in?
While I'm at it, is the odd increase/switch to vertical formats (as reported) due to a significant increase in the number of hand-held devices? And, should anyone know the answer: if a hand-held device is held horizontally they seem to reorient. Does this effect how they're recorded (i.e., do they report themselves as different resolution depending upon which side is up?). I don't have one of these monstrosities, so I can't do the test - should anyone have a notion to find out, I'd not mind knowing the answer.
| "The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits." - Albert Einstein | | "As far as we know, our computer has never had an undetected error." - Weisert | | "If you are searching for perfection in others, then you seek disappointment. If you are seek perfection in yourself, then you will find failure." - Balboos HaGadol Mar 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
When a handheld is re-oriented it may fire a page reload event that the client app (or client script in a webpage) can handle. I can't think of any modern handheld that will reload a page on reorientation, and so the initial report of a device's resolution will be based on the initial page load of that website, unless that website fires back, say, an Ajax call to provide more sample data.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
It's no good having a really humungously big screen if you can't rub it into everyone face. What better way than making an app that only works at that resolution?
|
|
|
|
|
For years (2000 to 2008) I designed software that worked only with multiple (4 to 8) 2K by 2.5K monitors.
Although I admit these were grayscale and if I needed any color I had to have a separate monitor for that.
John
|
|
|
|
|
Digital X-ray viewer applications?
|
|
|
|
|
djdanlib wrote: Digital X-ray viewer applications?
Yes for mammography.
John
|
|
|
|
|
4-8 screens of tits, even grey scale tits, now that is going to service someones fantasies somewhere.
Never underestimate the power of human stupidity
RAH
|
|
|
|
|
ed welch wrote: What better way than an app that only works at that resolution?/blockquote>
Making a pr0n app that only works at that resolution
|
|
|
|
|
And it’s a real challenge to fit an enterprise application with a rich UI in there. 
There is only one Vera Farmiga and Salma Hayek is her prophet!
Advertise here – minimum three posts per day are guaranteed.
|
|
|
|
|
Tis what I said. Our app will happily run on a smaller screen, the real issue is the amount of screens that the users wish to have open and visible at the same time.
Panic, Chaos, Destruction. My work here is done.
Drink. Get drunk. Fall over - P O'H
OK, I will win to day or my name isn't Ethel Crudacre! - DD Ethel Crudacre
I cannot live by bread alone. Bacon and ketchup are needed as well. - Trollslayer
Have a bit more patience with newbies. Of course some of them act dumb - they're often *students*, for heaven's sake - Terry Pratchett
|
|
|
|
|
Probably a more accurate question would be how much real estate the users need. In theory, our software has no limitations on the screen size. In practice the users want as much as possible. No, double that.
Most real users have 6 or 8 large screens in their monitor bank. The usual set up is 1 monitor for Bloomberg, one for e-mail and browser, and the others are filled with our app. The individual forms are not that large, save for some of the order blotters, but the users will have a lot open. A trader may well be following a dozen stocks with an L2 and then you can add in prop-trading and order handling.
[edit]
I didn't mention BACON this week, sorry.
Panic, Chaos, Destruction. My work here is done.
Drink. Get drunk. Fall over - P O'H
OK, I will win to day or my name isn't Ethel Crudacre! - DD Ethel Crudacre
I cannot live by bread alone. Bacon and ketchup are needed as well. - Trollslayer
Have a bit more patience with newbies. Of course some of them act dumb - they're often *students*, for heaven's sake - Terry Pratchett
modified 12-Dec-11 10:58am.
|
|
|
|
|
We've got users running XP and (worse) IE6 on eye-strain inducing CRT monitors runing at 640x480. 
|
|
|
|
|
Well - Western Perspective or not, whatever other nonsense you may have heard . . .
. . . size matters . . .
| "The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits." - Albert Einstein | | "As far as we know, our computer has never had an undetected error." - Weisert | | "If you are searching for perfection in others, then you seek disappointment. If you are seek perfection in yourself, then you will find failure." - Balboos HaGadol Mar 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
Me too - and all my users are in the US of A. 
It’s not because things are difficult that we do not dare, it’s because we do not dare that things are difficult. ~Seneca
|
|
|
|
|
 
Panic, Chaos, Destruction. My work here is done.
Drink. Get drunk. Fall over - P O'H
OK, I will win to day or my name isn't Ethel Crudacre! - DD Ethel Crudacre
I cannot live by bread alone. Bacon and ketchup are needed as well. - Trollslayer
Have a bit more patience with newbies. Of course some of them act dumb - they're often *students*, for heaven's sake - Terry Pratchett
|
|
|
|
|
Quote: That is such a Western Perspective
Rubbish. It's a statistical perspective
1. Browser display statistics[^]
2. Screen-resolutions.com[^]
I guess a "Western" perspective would be starting the stats at 800 and moving up - but even then that cuts out any web developer who's heard of a mobile device, and all mobile device devs themselves.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
That's a sure way to get lots of sales.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
