I do not see the VB.NET section, see section only visual basic, which is why I wrote in the 11 & VS. NET.
As for the rest, you're a programmer, it is not difficult to understand what I did, for this reason I dont added the code.
Reading the thread title, and content, it seems clear the code base that I could use.
At school, I did not study programming, but personally I would understand the code that could be used.
Just to understand, it is clear the problem I exposed?
Because if you do not even understand the problem I have given, would be useless to continue.
I proceed to show the underlying code, or I stop here?
Scusami ridi per ciò che ho scritto, oppure per il significato della frase?
Comunque a quanto pare tu non sei in grado di aiutarmi, probabilmente non vuoi aiutarmi o non sai aiutarmi, quello che ho capito è che non hai nulla da fare e che hai solo voglia di fare chiacchiere inutili.
Ti ripeto, non ho bisogno di lezioni di vita o di moralità, quindi lascia perdere, non perderti in chiacchiere inutili.
P. S. use google translate, I'll help you choose my home.
I am Italian.
Thanks again and goodbye
It uses AdornerDecorator & Thumb class for component moving and resizing, so
is it available in WinRT ?
No. Adorners were a WPF capability, and didn't exist in Silverlight - which WinRT is much closer to than WPF. In hunting around for an answer, I see that you have already asked and had answers to this here[^]. Asking the same question in a different location isn't going to change the underlying answer I'm afraid.
*pre-emptive celebratory nipple tassle jiggle* - Sean Ewington
I am wondering..
Is it possible to take advantage of the new C++ syntax, new COM generation, new C++ .NET interop functionality without using WinRT?
I.e. I'd like to write a normal WPF desktop application.
I would like to write some part of it in C++.
I'd like to bypass the previous (and slow & clumsy) interop technology and, if possible, use the new interop one, which will make supereasy and efficient to share my code between C++ / C# without reverting to C++ CLI.
I.e. do I neeed to use C++ CLI / Managed C++, or could I use this new C++ extension with .NET 4.5 WPF desktop app?
A train station is where the train stops. A bus station is where the bus stops. On my desk, I have a work station....
My programs never have bugs, they just develop random features.
I was surprised to see that with the Visual Studio 2012 RC release they have added Windows Vista support for .NET Framework 4.5.
Has anyone seen any indication that they plan to add Windows XP support in the future?
I do not mean if Microsoft will continue to support the Operating System. My question is whether or not it will be possible to install and use .NET framework 4.5 on Windows XP. Currently it is not listed as being supported.
The fact is that .Net 4.5 is not officially released. Therefore why would they spend their time on getting it integrated with a OS that is going out the door, prior to its release. That will be the last thing they do, if they even do it.
My point of it being supported is that in all likelyhood after 4.5 is officially released it will be released for all actively supported OSes. But that is just my thoughts. MS has not made any official statement to this AFAIK.
Computers have been intelligent for a long time now. It just so happens that the program writers are about as effective as a room full of monkeys trying to crank out a copy of Hamlet.