I was reading an article from one of the players who toured India in the 70's, Fletcher? I think. He said during that tour the Indian groundsmen had been instructed to prepare a 'result wicket' for the first test and then the rest of the tour as 'draw wickets'. The gameplan of the Indians was to go all out for a win in the 1st test and then bowl as slow as possible in the remaining tests in order to secure draws. He then suggested that that would be the Indian plan for this tour too.
I'm finding it hard to believe this could be true. I can't see the Indian fans being happy if they are watching their team play for a draw at home? What are your thoughts?
This might not be completely false because if you see that most of the matches were ended in draw. One reason could be that we were a very defensive side at that time so if we had the target of seccuring the series win at the cost of making the series boring was not unfair.
Things are lot different these days so you can expect the result this time.
As a fan I want the team win, even though it is a boring one sided match. Other factor in lot of Indians is they want to see their batsmen score runs. If they bat for 3 days scoring 700 runs with some making centuries, fans will be happy seeing that.