Re: SSRS 2005 - Database Discussion Boards

First Prev Next

Re: Select All Months and related data

Deepak Kr110-Dec-12 21:02

Deepak Kr1

10-Dec-12 21:02

Hope this will work

SQL

select years, month, sum(MonthCount) from
 (
 SELECT  to_char(trunc(RequestedDate, 'Year'), 'YYYY') as Years, to_char(trunc(RequestedDate, 'Month'), 'MON') as Month, count(to_char(trunc(RequestedDate, 'Month'), 'MON')) as MonthCount
 FROM MYTABLE
 group by to_char(trunc(RequestedDate, 'Year'), 'YYYY'), to_char(trunc(RequestedDate, 'Month'), 'MON')
  union
 select '2012' as years, 'JAN' as Month, 0 as MonthCount from dual
 union
 select '2012' as years, 'FEB' as Month, 0 as MonthCount from dual
 union
 select '2012' as years, 'MAR' as Month, 0 as MonthCount from dual
 union
 select '2012' as years, 'APR' as Month, 0 as MonthCount from dual
 union
 select '2012' as years, 'MAY' as Month, 0 as MonthCount from dual
 union
 select '2012' as years, 'JUN' as Month, 0 as MonthCount from dual
 union
 select '2012' as years, 'JULY' as Month, 0 as MonthCount from dual
 union
 select '2012' as years, 'AUG' as Month, 0 as MonthCount from dual
 union
 select '2012' as years, 'SEPT' as Month, 0 as MonthCount from dual
 union
 select '2012' as years, 'OCT' as Month, 0 as MonthCount from dual
 union
 select '2012' as years, 'NOV' as Month, 0 as MonthCount from dual
 union
 select '2012' as years, 'DEC' as Month, 0 as MonthCount from dual
 ) group by years, month

Re: Select All Months and related data

VishwaKL10-Dec-12 21:46

VishwaKL

10-Dec-12 21:46

Thanks deepak,

But i getting 2 errors after executing , i changed mytable to my real table, but it giving below mentioned errors

1) 'trunc' is not a recognized built-in function name

and

2)Incorrect syntax near ')'.

Re: Select All Months and related data

Deepak Kr110-Dec-12 22:25

Deepak Kr1

10-Dec-12 22:25

Hey i just used the trunc method for oracle, u can replace to yr old year and month method to get the result, but the concept is that we will use the union clause to get the data for those month for which we dont have the data than we will do a union with yr old query then on the top of that put a sum for monthcount with group by month and year.

so yr query will be

SQL

select years, month, sum(MonthCount) from
 (
 SELECT  YEAR(RequestedDate) as Years, Month(RequestedDate) as MonthInNumbers,Count(Month(RequestedDate))
 FROM MYTABLE
 group by YEAR(RequestedDate),Month(RequestedDate)
  union
 select '2012' as years, 'JAN' as Month, 0 as MonthCount from dual
 union
 select '2012' as years, 'FEB' as Month, 0 as MonthCount from dual
 union
 select '2012' as years, 'MAR' as Month, 0 as MonthCount from dual
 union
 select '2012' as years, 'APR' as Month, 0 as MonthCount from dual
 union
 select '2012' as years, 'MAY' as Month, 0 as MonthCount from dual
 union
 select '2012' as years, 'JUN' as Month, 0 as MonthCount from dual
 union
 select '2012' as years, 'JULY' as Month, 0 as MonthCount from dual
 union
 select '2012' as years, 'AUG' as Month, 0 as MonthCount from dual
 union
 select '2012' as years, 'SEPT' as Month, 0 as MonthCount from dual
 union
 select '2012' as years, 'OCT' as Month, 0 as MonthCount from dual
 union
 select '2012' as years, 'NOV' as Month, 0 as MonthCount from dual
 union
 select '2012' as years, 'DEC' as Month, 0 as MonthCount from dual
 ) group by years, month

SSRS 2005

berba6-Dec-12 6:32

berba

6-Dec-12 6:32

Hi,

I've developed a report in SSRS 2005. My query is returning more that 65,000 rows and I'm getting an error when exporting the report to excel. Any idea how to solve this?

The report can be exported successfully in PDF

Cheers
Berba

Re: SSRS 2005

David Mujica6-Dec-12 7:59

David Mujica

6-Dec-12 7:59

This is a limit of Excel. I beleive Excel 2010 allows for more than 65,000.

I think you only solution would be to break the results into multiple Excel documents.

Remember to vote.

Re: SSRS 2005

Corporal Agarn6-Dec-12 9:30

Corporal Agarn

6-Dec-12 9:30

Microsoft does not know that Excel can now hold more rows, even when you tell it to use the newer format.

Re: SSRS 2005

Mycroft Holmes6-Dec-12 16:57

Mycroft Holmes

6-Dec-12 16:57

65k rows is NOT a report, it is a data dump. You are using the wrong tool for the job, you should be exporting the data as csv either from the database or your client application NOT a reporting tool!

Never underestimate the power of human stupidity
RAH

Re: SSRS 2005

berba6-Dec-12 18:06

berba

6-Dec-12 18:06

The report is loading fine on the asp.net webpage via the report viewer control.

It's just when exporting to excel the customer is getting an error. In PDF it is fine

Re: SSRS 2005

Mycroft Holmes6-Dec-12 21:43

Mycroft Holmes

6-Dec-12 21:43

berba wrote:
It's just when exporting to excel the customer is getting an error

Which means it is the WRONG tool for the job. The tool has a limitation, as pointed out by David and djj.

Never underestimate the power of human stupidity
RAH

SQL Group By Question

loyal ginger6-Dec-12 5:27

loyal ginger

6-Dec-12 5:27

I am trying to do this in Microsoft Access. I seem to be unable to construct a 'simple' query. To illustrate, here is a sample table:

Field1	Field2	Amount 
A	New	10
D	Old	5
G	Old	1
H	Old	15
H	New	55
X	Old	20
Z	Old	100
Z	New	20

I need to group by Field1 and only return the Field2 data for the record that has the maximum number in the Amount field. I tried to use the 'First' function but Microsoft Access sort the records internally so it does not return the right value even if I pre-sort the records with a sub-query. Do you have any advice? The result should look like the table below.

Desired Result:

Field1	Field2	Max(Amount)
A	New	10
D	Old	5
G	Old	1
H	New	55
X	Old	20
Z	Old	100

I have trouble getting the value of Field2 in the record containing to the maximum value of 'Amount.'

Any suggestions? Thanks in advance for your time!

modified 6-Dec-12 11:51am.

Re: SQL Group By Question

Blue_Boy6-Dec-12 10:11

Blue_Boy

6-Dec-12 10:11

You can try this query

SQL

SELECT mt.Field1,
       (
           SELECT TOP 1 mt2.Field2
           FROM   myTable mt2
           WHERE  mt2.Field1 = mt.Field1
           ORDER BY
                  mt2.Amount DESC
       ) AS Field2,
       MAX(mt.Amount)
FROM   myTable mt
GROUP BY
       mt.Field1

I Love T-SQL
"VB.NET is developed with C#.NET"
If my post helps you kindly save my time by voting my post.

Re: SQL Group By Question

loyal ginger31-Dec-12 5:48

loyal ginger

31-Dec-12 5:48

Thanks for your time!

Issues installing ODP.NETx64

cpp_prgmer6-Dec-12 4:18

cpp_prgmer

6-Dec-12 4:18

I just got a new 64bit machine and I'm migrating my code from my old 32bit machine. I wanted to install Oracle Data Providor for .NET, the 64bit one and I selected 64-bit ODAC 11.2 Release 5 (11.2.0.3.20) Xcopy for Windows x64 bit it had a note:
"Important: The 32-bit Oracle Developer Tools for Visual Studio download is required for Entity Framework design-time features".
So I installed the 32 bit Oracle Data Provider for .NET which is ODAC 11.2 Release 5 and Oracle Developer Tools for Visual Studio (11.2.0.3.20) with the hope that I could do the 64 bit installation on top of that.
Now the 64bit installation does not go through and I am not able to uninstall the 32 bit installation and I have no clue how to get out of this mess.

Sorry this is my first time installing as well as posting, experts please guide me.

Re: Issues installing ODP.NETx64

Eddy Vluggen6-Dec-12 14:37

Eddy Vluggen

6-Dec-12 14:37

"Virtual Machine"

Don't use your primary development-machine as a testing-ground; use a virtual machine. I know it's slower, but it's also a lot safer.

Bastard Programmer from Hell Suspicious | :suss:

If you can't read my code, try converting it here[^]
They hate us for our freedom![^]

Re: Issues installing ODP.NETx64

Peter_in_27806-Dec-12 15:12

Peter_in_2780

6-Dec-12 15:12

Sounds like your advice comes a bit late...

Cheers,
Peter

Software rusts. Simon Stephenson, ca 1994. So does this signature. me, 2012

Re: Issues installing ODP.NETx64

Mycroft Holmes6-Dec-12 16:52

Mycroft Holmes

6-Dec-12 16:52

I imagine he is trying to set up his primary development machine, not just testing a new environment.

Never underestimate the power of human stupidity
RAH

Re: Issues installing ODP.NETx64

Mycroft Holmes6-Dec-12 16:53

Mycroft Holmes

6-Dec-12 16:53

Investigate wether you have a system restore point prior to the installation of the driver!

Never underestimate the power of human stupidity
RAH

SQL Query - append results

AndreFratelli5-Dec-12 6:43

AndreFratelli

5-Dec-12 6:43

Hi everyone,

I'm having trouble with this query in SQL (homework!).

I have two tables: customer and staff.

== Customer (the relevant fields) ==
customer_id
first_name
last_name

== Staff ==
staff_id
first_name
last_name

The question is: "select the first and last names of all customers and staff".

Can anybody help on how to do that? I don't know how to "append" the results of the two queries, and googling I can only find about INSERT ... SELECT, which is not what I'm looking for =\

Best regards to all.

Fratelli

Re: SQL Query - append results

Chris Meech5-Dec-12 6:55

Chris Meech

5-Dec-12 6:55

Perhaps the keyword "UNION" may help you. Smile | :)

Chris Meech
I am Canadian. [heard in a local bar]

In theory there is no difference between theory and practice. In practice there is. [Yogi Berra]

posting about Crystal Reports here is like discussing gay marriage on a catholic church’s website.[Nishant Sivakumar]

Re: SQL Query - append results

AndreFratelli5-Dec-12 7:08

AndreFratelli

5-Dec-12 7:08

It does indeed ! Big Grin | :-D

Thank you

Fratelli

SQL 2008 Data Base Table Design suggestion

VishwaKL4-Dec-12 23:36

VishwaKL

4-Dec-12 23:36

Hi Guys,

I have a problem to create data base.

My requirement is like

there are 4 different sites are there and every site has a common checklist to be checked and sites also have extra check list to checked with common check list, for this how i should create data base table.?

Thanks in advance
Vishwa

Re: SQL 2008 Data Base Table Design suggestion

Simon_Whale4-Dec-12 23:43

Simon_Whale

4-Dec-12 23:43

From you brief description;

I am assuming that you are using a central database.

I see that you would need to create a

site table (used to store the sites that will use the database)
Checklist Template (list of things to check off)
Checklist Completed table (a join table that links the site with the completed items from the template table)

Lobster Thermidor aux crevettes with a Mornay sauce, served in a Provençale manner with shallots and aubergines, garnished with truffle pate, brandy and a fried egg on top and Spam - Monty Python Spam Sketch

Re: SQL 2008 Data Base Table Design suggestion

VishwaKL4-Dec-12 23:47

VishwaKL

4-Dec-12 23:47

Thanks Simon

that extra check list are not common to all sites so. how can i relate those points

like which is required which is not for particular Site?

Re: SQL 2008 Data Base Table Design suggestion

Simon_Whale4-Dec-12 23:51

Simon_Whale

4-Dec-12 23:51

well in the check list completed table (more than likely not a good name) you could record the todo item and a datetime completed? and the site that it is linked to.

Lobster Thermidor aux crevettes with a Mornay sauce, served in a Provençale manner with shallots and aubergines, garnished with truffle pate, brandy and a fried egg on top and Spam - Monty Python Spam Sketch

Re: SQL 2008 Data Base Table Design suggestion

PIEBALDconsult5-Dec-12 3:56

PIEBALDconsult

5-Dec-12 3:56

Your description isn't clear enough, so here's a design that could be used for some interpretations of what you wrote.

0) There are several sites.
1) A check list has several check list items.
2) Each site has a check list with a subset of all available check list items.
3) Each check list item may be on several sites' check lists.

This is a classic many-to-many relationship and the typical implementation is to have (at least) three tables:

Site: ID, Name, etc.
Item: ID, Name, etc.
SiteList: SiteID, ItemID (usually no other data here, but maybe in some cases)

Another schema would allow for defining lists and assigning them to sites:

Site: ID, Name, etc.
Item: ID, Name, etc.
List: ID, Name, etc.
ListItem: ListID, ItemID (usually no other data here, but maybe in some cases)
SiteList: SiteID, ListID (usually no other data here, but maybe in some cases)

This second way may be approriate for your needs, you can define a common list and custom lists and assign multiple lists to the sites. Getting a complete list of all items for a site is simple as well.

Last Visit: 31-Dec-99 18:00 Last Update: 24-Apr-24 22:48

Refresh

ᐊ Prev 1...309 310 311 312313314 315 316 317 318 Next ᐅ

Use Ctrl+Left/Right to switch messages, Ctrl+Up/Down to switch threads, Ctrl+Shift+Left/Right to switch pages.