 |
|
Just the 1 upvote there.
I wasn't, now I am, then I won't be anymore.
|
|
|
|
|
Then the mystery deepens, or the Finger's just not up to job. Either way I can only suggest that Mr Graus perhaps do some micro surgery on Bob's brain to go after a particular incident like the one I mentioned or your trial and see what happened. If I have to sacrifice a couple of hundred points for the greater good and all that I'm sure I'll get over it 
"The secret of happiness is freedom, and the secret of freedom, courage."
Thucydides (B.C. 460-400)
|
|
|
|
|
Marcus Kramer wrote: I wonder if the same happy-clickey-finger issue happens on the voting buttons as wel
Nopes. I recently observed that the answer acceptance by a high rep is also multiple of 25 and not just 25 that we generally see in our history (because of low rep guys asking and marking it solved.) Saying this, just like other places, for platinum member marking it solved has a multipler 8 to it leading to 200 points in a go.
|
|
|
|
|
What about when just posting regular messages? Consider this a test of that.
[EDIT]Nope.[/EDIT]
Soren Madsen
"When you don't know what you're doing it's best to do it quickly" - Jase #DuckDynasty
|
|
|
|
|
Maybe they are using JavaScript to automate the task?
|
|
|
|
|
I attempted to do this with a short comment, but there is no way I can click more than once before the comment is submitted and the button is "gone".
Soren Madsen
"When you don't know what you're doing it's best to do it quickly" - Jase #DuckDynasty
|
|
|
|
|
I attempted to do this while editing this[^] question. It's funny, I clicked like a crazy person on that Submit button, but only two of the clicks resulted in points, yet it says "v16" next to the edit information...
Soren Madsen
"When you don't know what you're doing it's best to do it quickly" - Jase #DuckDynasty
|
|
|
|
|
thats strange.. it was only the rep points having trouble before but after todays update something really went wrong... now it spread in other forums too..
Jibesh V P
|
|
|
|
|
I can confirm this. Checked it on one of the answer.
And I see many people doing this [/or probably happening automatically as the above post says] (checked a few from 'Top Experts in 24hrs' list).
..Go Green..
modified 7 Feb '13 - 7:19.
|
|
|
|
|
Steps to reproduce:
0. Login and go to article
1. Click "Update your article"
2. Article Submission Wizard shown with "Enter your article's title here"
|
|
|
|
|
Given that it might be possible to exclude web crawlers and search bots completely from indexing articles but that we obviously don't want to. Is it possible, while letting them in not to count them towards article view counts.
While I find it difficult although not impossible to believe that 2000 real people might choose to read 'some stuff what I wrote' I don't find it believable that none of them hated it enough to say so. It would be nice to be proved wrong.
Clearly this can't be done retrospectively which might cause some comparability issues but I still think it would be an improvement.
"The secret of happiness is freedom, and the secret of freedom, courage."
Thucydides (B.C. 460-400)
|
|
|
|
|
Hi
Please provide some option where people who are down voting some of the questions can give the reason for that.. so that it will be easy to know that what is wrong in our question..if someone is not providing any reason please don't allow them to down vote..
Hope you will think over it..
Thank you
Snehasish Nandy
|
|
|
|
|
This has been discussed many times. Potentially one of three things could happen.
- People will stop downvoting bad questions because there will be a temptation for people to take up revenge voting.
- People will create sockpuppet accounts specifically downvote questions
- People will just enter meaningless rubbish like asa;sldifj as the reason
|
|
|
|
|
But at least the people who are serious about this forum and take things seriously they will give proper comments..else it's difficult for beginners to know how to put up the questions or where they went wrong..
|
|
|
|
|
The people who are serious will give you comments anyway. If I downvote you because I think your question is poor, I'll tell you. Depending on how well I understood the question, I may even offer pointers on how to improve it.
|
|
|
|
|
After checking out a few of your questions that were downvoted, most were questions that you either could have found out with a simple google search, or ones that were unclear and needed more information. In the case of the unclear ones, I agree that it would be nice for someone to indicate that, but in the case of questions that lend themselves to www.lmgtfy.com answers, I can understand why no comments are left.
I wasn't, now I am, then I won't be anymore.
|
|
|
|
|
Hello
I switch my acount more than 8 times from "Daily Digest" to "Weekly Digest" but after a few days it always switch back to "Daily Diges" !
What are you doing ?
I try it now again!
But if it switch back again I will "Unsubscribe" me !! => if it works 
|
|
|
|
|
Many people ask very banal questions in QA. Instead of removing them totally, I'd suggest to create a section "Training questions for students" and move them there. No answer will be provided. The section could be sub-categorized into "beginners", "intermediate" and "expert" levels. Then all our students who wish to test and practise their current knowledge could get a lot of valuable training material.
|
|
|
|
|
Sounds like a great idea to me. But you still have the problem that someone has to decide which question belongs to which level...
|
|
|
|
|
Dear All,
my first code project account is disable due to something wrong from myside.
so, i humbly request to active my account which email address is "miteshmachhi1014@gmail.com".
this thing is never happened again from myside.So, please active my account once time.
Yours Faithfully User,
Mitesh Machhi
|
|
|
|
|
since you have this account valid, cant you just change your e-mail address to this account?
Jibesh V P
|
|
|
|
|
but sir there is nearer to 3000 points on that account. so, please do the needful
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beautiful...
I wasn't, now I am, then I won't be anymore.
|
|
|
|
|
You should provide a link to your other (disabled) account.
|
|
|
|
|
but sir there is nearer to 3000 points on that account. so, please do the needful.
|
|
|
|
|
It's not for me to fix it; I just suggested that you provide a link so the administrators know which account you are talking about. And while you are at it you could explain why you need two accounts.
|
|
|
|
|
so, how to take the link of my disable account. I know the Name which i provided to him.
|
|
|
|
|
Well you must know the name of the account so it's not too difficult to find.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mitesh Machhi wrote: please do the needful
How many times do you need to be told?
|
|
|
|
|
Hi Mits Machhi,
Your account at CodeProject has been reported as The member is being abusive or is a troll 2 times and is now deactivated.
this message come when my account is disable.
|
|
|
|
|
Mitesh Machhi wrote: Your account at CodeProject has been reported as The member is being abusive or is a troll 2 times and is now deactivated.
This simply means that you have tripped on some peoples feet who thought your behavior is abusive or trolling.
IMO: No mercy with abusive people, trolls and spammers. Start from scratch again and do not be abusive, a troll or a spammer.
edit: mercy for merry. Even if the no merry thing would be adequate as well.
|
|
|
|
|
but it is not done again . so please do the needful last time.
|
|
|
|
|
Mitesh Machhi wrote: but it is not done again
I hope so. Write some good articles and tips and you will get your points back.
|
|
|
|
|
Dear Sir,
there is so hard work i done for got that points and now i am not want to start from 0. so, please do at last time my humble request to you.
please sir, last time.
|
|
|
|
|
I ain't a judge. The site admins will take care of your problem. And they will also reactivate your old account if they decide to do so.
I just added my personal opinion. And I personally do not believe that you had near to 3000 points on that account. You have posted only one question and some votes on one article. I suppose this account was just a sock puppet and you are one of the doomed sock puppeteers.
|
|
|
|
|
The people you are answering to have no powers to resurrect your account. That must be done by a Code Project staff member - and don't bother pleading with me, I don't work for Code Project either.
Why are the points so important to you though? Is this an ego thing?
|
|
|
|
|
|
If memory serves me correctly, that account was deactivated because of sock-puppet voting, so I guess the points are what matters.
I wasn't, now I am, then I won't be anymore.
|
|
|
|
|
Has anybody done the needful yet?
|
|
|
|
|
I've eaten my breakfast and ingested my caffeine for the day, if that's what you mean.
I wasn't, now I am, then I won't be anymore.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Can you do the needful then?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yes and many names before that. Just do the needful.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Then please use the Spam & Abuse forum; this is not a site bug.
|
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
Post your Blog
