Design and Architecture

Hint: For improved responsiveness ensure Javascript is enabled and choose 'Normal' from the Layout dropdown and hit 'Update'. You must Sign In to use this message board.

Search this forum   Profile popups    Spacing RelaxedCompactTight   Noise Very HighHighMediumLowVery Low   Layout Open AllThread ViewNo JavascriptPreview   Per page 102550   Show Last VisitLast DayLast WeekLast MonthLast 3 MthsLast 6 MthsLast YearAll

FirstPrevNext

Re: Memory management for object growing in size Bernhard Hiller 27 Feb '13 - 23:27  navigation Nani Maneesh 20 Feb '13 - 7:14  Re: navigation jschell 20 Feb '13 - 8:16  Re: navigation Sandeep Mewara 20 Feb '13 - 17:08  DDD and vb.net alex.barylski 17 Feb '13 - 7:33  Advice - WCF/MSMQ or Async TCP Ger Hayden 14 Feb '13 - 9:14  Re: Advice - WCF/MSMQ or Async TCP jschell 14 Feb '13 - 12:25  Some considerations which might or might not matter.   I am rather certain that you can't use WCF, MSMQ and MSMQ Transactions. You can investigate yourself but I believe there is a fundamental problem in terms of receiving them. Basically they can be sent ok (with a transaction), but when receiving them there is no assurance that the transaction is preserved. (I can't remember how I came to this conclusion.)   MSMQ has a hard 4 meg byte limit per message. Between overhead and unicode (not optional) that can reduce the maximum message sized to less than 2 meg (bytes.) Microsoft technical docs state they have no intention of changing this limit.   Despite claims to the contrary WCF/MSMQ does not support a streaming operation. So the message must always be less than 2 meg.   MSMQ uses magic routing which is great when it works (when you get all the ports/permissions right) but is extremely difficult to figure out otherwise. And because of that messages can take a long time to arrive at the target, for example hours.   MSMQ at least on OSes before 2008 (and maybe that too) uses by default a single file with a 2 gig limit for persistence. MSMQ will crash if that file fills. And there is no way to monitor problems via the MSMQ API (maybe there is something in WMI.)   Most of the standard MSMQ 'queues' use Active Directory. If Active Directory has problems then MSMQ will have problems. If you use options to exclude Active Directory then you CANNOT insure transactions are in use. See next note.   If one queue uses transactions and the other end doesn't, messages just disappear.   MSMQ failures can result in MSMQ exceptions which have a enum which indicates the type of error. The problem however is that API can end up returning a value, via the enum api, which is not a enum. Basically violating the contract of the method.   MSMQ queue permissions and application permissions must match. Which would seem obvious. However if they don't match then it returns non-helpful errors. Such as telling you that the queue doesn't exist (even though it does.)   MSMQ is supposed to support multiple clients consuming from a single queue. However someone I know (but not me) ran a test that suggested performance was significantly degraded in such a scenario when transactions were in use. Developing around this is complicated.   I can state that I built message streaming using chunking to break a larger (bigger than 4 meg) into pieces. It was extremely difficult. Especially since I was attempting to support multiple clients (see above limitation)   MSMQ is tied to the OS. This of course means that if you want to upgrade from, say, MSMQ 3.0 to 4.0, then you must upgrade the OS. Sign In·View Thread·Permalink Re: Advice - WCF/MSMQ or Async TCP Ger Hayden 14 Feb '13 - 22:40  Re: Advice - WCF/MSMQ or Async TCP Raul Iloc 24 Feb '13 - 2:01  rich text editor Danielos_s23 30 Jan '13 - 10:03  Re: rich text editor José Amílcar Ferreira Casimiro 11 Feb '13 - 5:37  MVVM, EF and TDD tutorials cansino 17 Jan '13 - 6:06  Java and C# operating on the same data in an ASP-based monitoring web application. vValkir 17 Jan '13 - 0:18  Re: Java and C# operating on the same data in an ASP-based monitoring web application. Jonathan C Dickinson 17 Jan '13 - 3:05  indesign cs6 trial - no toolbar Member 9344823 6 Jan '13 - 12:10  Re: indesign cs6 trial - no toolbar Pete O'Hanlon 17 Jan '13 - 0:49  How do you design this? : with a better example VuNic 30 Dec '12 - 17:57  Re: How do you design this? : with a better example Christian Graus 30 Dec '12 - 18:25  Re: How do you design this? : with a better example VuNic 30 Dec '12 - 18:42  Re: How do you design this? : with a better example Christian Graus 30 Dec '12 - 18:46  Re: How do you design this? : with a better example jschell 31 Dec '12 - 9:10  Re: How do you design this? : with a better example Eddy Vluggen 31 Dec '12 - 17:04  Re: How do you design this? : with a better example Keld Ølykke 16 Jan '13 - 11:23  How to find the similarity between users in Twitter ? How to design a good and efficient idea? ldaneil 27 Dec '12 - 7:26  Re: How to find the similarity between users in Twitter ? How to design a good and efficient idea? Pete O'Hanlon 27 Dec '12 - 7:39

Last Visit: 31 Dec '99 - 18:00     Last Update: 20 May '13 - 19:00 Refresh « Prev1234567891011 Next »

General    News    Suggestion    Question    Bug    Answer    Joke    Rant    Admin