|
Rohan Leuva wrote: Member needs 4 more
Not anymore
M.D.V. 
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
gone
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
gone
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Which is the offensive post? The latest one doesn't seem problematic.
Curious
"I had the right to remain silent, but I didn't have the ability!"
Ron White, Comedian
modified 28-Jul-14 8:02am.
|
|
|
|
|
Is it the lack of English in the comments?
|
|
|
|
|
Pete O'Hanlon wrote: Is it the lack of English in the comments?
Heck, if lack / misuse of English in forum posts would be a punishable offense, most of the CP populace would be guilty. 
Cheers!
"I had the right to remain silent, but I didn't have the ability!"
Ron White, Comedian
|
|
|
|
|
|
gone
M.D.V. 
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Also he has some of the deleted rubbish in form of comments. ATM, it seems like user will be no more...
"When you don't know what you're doing it's best to do it quickly"- SoMad
|
|
|
|
|
Luser[^]
Message[^] (Cannot be reported due to an MIA report flag)
What do you get when you cross a joke with a rhetorical question?
|
|
|
|
|
|
What do you get when you cross a joke with a rhetorical question?
|
|
|
|
|
|
How can I prove I'm genuine? 
And why isn't there any rule in the guide for posting tips/articles concerning links to practical life? (I personally am VERY interested to know the environment from which the postings of source code come.)
But I can stick to the rules. Why not? But why don't you tell us new authors in the guidelines for writing articles?
|
|
|
|
|
There is a reasonable length FAQ: Code Project Article FAQ[^] - it doesn't mention spam (probably because spammers won't bother reading anything particularly) but anything which is "heavy" on links to a company that isn't relevant to the topic is probably going to get a "spam" notice slapped on it! 
You'd be surprised how many items we get which are as short as yours and contain as many links as yours did which are there purely to advertise, drive traffic, or "link-up" search engines. You've taken out the links, and as a tip it now looks reasonable so it shouldn't be a problem any more - and if you read my initial report it did say "I think he is genuine, and if he removes / changes the tip I can;t see a good reason to kick him off.". But just in case, it gets reported here so if you are just interested in free adverts it won't stay "live" for long!
Those who fail to learn history are doomed to repeat it. --- George Santayana (December 16, 1863 – September 26, 1952)
Those who fail to clear history are doomed to explain it. --- OriginalGriff (February 24, 1959 – ∞)
|
|
|
|
|
|
The zombified corpse of a recently banned trollish member: now trying to get anyone else banned.
Just ignore him, and maybe he'll go away...
ElliotSummers[^]
Those who fail to learn history are doomed to repeat it. --- George Santayana (December 16, 1863 – September 26, 1952)
Those who fail to clear history are doomed to explain it. --- OriginalGriff (February 24, 1959 – ∞)
|
|
|
|
|
By allowing a group of members to decide the fate of another member is a mob mentality, if you can not have over sight as to right and wrong, particularly in the case where someone is bullied to the point their response's are not abusive but self defensive, then you are providing a safe heaven for a group to bully new members.
Furthermore the person that started the attacks; long before the banned member started to reply with hate, had a
history of abusing other members, and continued to abuse more members in the process.
"bullying” means the severe or repeated use by one or more pupils of a written, verbal, electronic or other form of expression, a physical act or gesture or any combination of them if it is directed at another pupil and if it has the effect of or is reasonably intended to have the effect of
(a) causing physical or emotional harm to the other pupil or damage to the other pupil’s property,
(b) placing the other pupil in reasonable fear of harm to himself or herself or damage to his or her property,
(c) creating a hostile environment at school for the other pupil,
(d) infringing on the legal rights of the other pupil at school, or
(e) materially and substantially disrupting the education process or the orderly operation of a school; (“intimidation”)
The banned member did not repeatedly attack a user.
You have to gave the user the ability to defend themselves, and if you are going to remove access to the writer of written information then you need to remove that information from public view.
http://www.ontla.on.ca/web/bills/bills_detail.do?locale=en&BillID=2550[^]
modified 27-Jul-14 11:57am.
|
|
|
|
|
I think you think he is me. 
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
