|
Standards are good, we should have lots and lots of them! 
- I would love to change the world, but they won’t give me the source code.
|
|
|
|
|
I can't wait for .NET Standard Super Plus.
|
|
|
|
|
I did not write this:
r = new System.Drawing.Rectangle(ExtensionMethods.TopLeftCorner(DisplayRectangle), new Size(anchorSize, anchorSize));
I had written:
r = new Rectangle(DisplayRectangle.TopLeftCorner(), new Size(anchorSize, anchorSize));
When the elephant did VS2015 decide to refactor my code??? 
Marc
|
|
|
|
|
Insider news? Long day Marc? 
Jeremy Falcon
|
|
|
|
|
the gods can manifest anywhere.
«There is a spectrum, from "clearly desirable behaviour," to "possibly dodgy behavior that still makes some sense," to "clearly undesirable behavior." We try to make the latter into warnings or, better, errors. But stuff that is in the middle category you don’t want to restrict unless there is a clear way to work around it.» Eric Lippert, May 14, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jeremy Falcon wrote: Insider news? Long day Marc?
Ooops! I'd meant to post that in the lounge, didn't realize I was here!
Can I blame that on a CP WTF??? 
Marc
|
|
|
|
|
Marc Clifton wrote: Can I blame that on a CP WTF???
Not until you say JavaScript is awesome. 
Jeremy Falcon
|
|
|
|
|
Surely this is a case of MC WTF?
This space for rent
|
|
|
|
|
Hi Marc, I wonder if something changed in your NameSpace(s) usage, or, if somehow a reference to System.Drawing got lost.
Are you using anything like ReSharper that will munge your code.
cheers, Bill
«There is a spectrum, from "clearly desirable behaviour," to "possibly dodgy behavior that still makes some sense," to "clearly undesirable behavior." We try to make the latter into warnings or, better, errors. But stuff that is in the middle category you don’t want to restrict unless there is a clear way to work around it.» Eric Lippert, May 14, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
No and No
Marc
|
|
|
|
|
BillWoodruff wrote: Are you using anything like ReSharper that will munge your code.
I've found that vanilla VS2015 now includes quite a few ReSharper-isms. I haven't used it a whole lot (most of my VS code base is still on 2013), but I don't recall if it auto applied said -isms or if you had to use a key command (like R#'s alt-Enter) to get to them.
|
|
|
|
|
By default, they are applied automatically. There is a configuration setting to disable them though.
|
|
|
|
|
Did you pass it through your Android spell checker?
(Actually, my first thought was ReSharper.)
|
|
|
|
|
Step into the freak-show: will the Lady be Bearded, or the Lizard Man's scales slough off ?
21:00 US Eastern Standard Time, London 02:00, UTC: 01:00 ... for other times around the world: [^].
Debate streaming sites: [^].
Warning: symptoms of vertigo, dizziness, and nausea, may ensue.
«There is a spectrum, from "clearly desirable behaviour," to "possibly dodgy behavior that still makes some sense," to "clearly undesirable behavior." We try to make the latter into warnings or, better, errors. But stuff that is in the middle category you don’t want to restrict unless there is a clear way to work around it.» Eric Lippert, May 14, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
Oh, just by chance I'll be bathing my cat at that time. It will be more enjoyable.
|
|
|
|
|
imho, a satisfyingly deep overview of the technology's origin, iterations, and current state: [^].
«There is a spectrum, from "clearly desirable behaviour," to "possibly dodgy behavior that still makes some sense," to "clearly undesirable behavior." We try to make the latter into warnings or, better, errors. But stuff that is in the middle category you don’t want to restrict unless there is a clear way to work around it.» Eric Lippert, May 14, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
Good article.
I love the part that shows Ballmer had about enough industry and company vision as to require a service dog to help get him around.
|
|
|
|
|
Know that the FPGA has been with us since the 80s.
The article state " They're called Field Programmable Gate Arrays..."
|
|
|
|
|
Indeed, FPGA's have been around a long time; the MS FPGA's has some significant features that are new, which you'll see if you read the article. You did read the article ?
«There is a spectrum, from "clearly desirable behaviour," to "possibly dodgy behavior that still makes some sense," to "clearly undesirable behavior." We try to make the latter into warnings or, better, errors. But stuff that is in the middle category you don’t want to restrict unless there is a clear way to work around it.» Eric Lippert, May 14, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
Yeah, that's for people reading the article that aren't nerds.
|
|
|
|
|
Scientists have formally announced their reconstruction of the Ein Gedi Scroll, the most ancient Hebrew scroll since the Dead Sea Scrolls. "Don't look at it, no matter what happens!"
|
|
|
|
|
If genuine it belongs at the beginning of the Bible and is believed to read "To my darling Candy. All characters portrayed within this book are fictitious and any resemblance to persons living or dead is purely coincidental." The page has been universally condemned by church leaders.
|
|
|
|
|
Is it Friday 27th Geldof[^] already? 
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
Either that or it's a letter from a Nigerian prince...
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
