|
|
Well the icons are so small that I'm not sure that what he's hold could be discerned, so it could be anything, even his love sword. Oops, there I am, dancing on the edge again. 
".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010
-
You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010
-
When you pry the gun from my cold dead hands, be careful - the barrel will be very hot. - JSOP, 2013
|
|
|
|
|
I think you're losing your touch. Maybe even getting soft.
Settles helmet more firmly on head, cinches flak jacket a little tighter...
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Did you just challenge him?
Sit's back and watches as the chaos is unfolding
Tom
|
|
|
|
|
Who'll bring the popcorn?
|
|
|
|
|
Well, I'm just not as excited about stuff as I used to be I guess. I blame global warming.
BTA, shouldn't you be working on the DST problems that are plaguing the site?
".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010
-
You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010
-
When you pry the gun from my cold dead hands, be careful - the barrel will be very hot. - JSOP, 2013
|
|
|
|
|
No, you're not alone.
There's a lot of methods used to fight with spamm. I agree with you that message posted by member decide what it is, not a report posted on Spam And Abusive Watch board.
Please, see my proposal[^].
|
|
|
|
|
To reduce the work needed to report a spammer (mod has to check queue, report, post message with link in forum, 10th person posts a message with gone) following suggestion:
[disclaimer]
I have no knowledge of how the queue works right now (I'v never seen it)
I have no idea how you would display it, I'm not really good at web front end stuff, but I'm sure you guys can come up with something
[/disclaimer]
I assume the queue has a button to report the post as spam or some other abuse.
I propose a button that does the following:
- report as spam (like now)
- report the user as spammer (like now ?)
- add the user to a list (new) (with a check if the user is already on it or not)
This list then get's displayed (see disclaimer) somehow on the forum.
Other members can then click the link to further investigate and report
On the 10th report on a account, this list get's checked to see if the members profile is in it, if so it get's removed from the list.
This should reduce a lot of the current work needed to report someone, without altering the current system (that works pretty well in my opinion)
Of course there will still be a need for the forum, since not everything goes thru the moderation queue but it should reduce the amount of posts.
PS: I can't use made up html tags anymore? had to replace <> with [], the tags didn't show up (and the text between them neither), and if I did just <> without closing it everything after it was gone. (I have 'use markdown formatting' turned off)
Tom
|
|
|
|
|
Message Removed
modified 28-Sep-16 14:57pm.
|
|
|
|
|
Last few days CodeProject site is under massive spammers attack. Spamm filters are working fine, but i was wondering about another options, which can help us in spamm protection:
- We can add more privileges to members, which belong to Protector[^] group.
I can see few solutions:
- 3 "spammer" reports on member account would lock spammer account for few minutes/hours. Spammer is unable to post any message in lock-time,
or
- 3 "spammer" reports on member account would delete account.
or
- 5 messages marked by protectors as "spamm" - see one of above options
- We can call reCaptcha[^] "filter" for those members whose activity is more than usual. An unusual activity can be defined as "more than 3 messages in 3 minutes" or else...
What you think about that?
modified 28-Sep-16 3:46am.
|
|
|
|
|
The problem here is that it's a bot by the looks of things, so a short delay doesn't do much of any use - they would just switch to the next account quicker and come back later. They don't seem to have any shortage of "pre-made" accounts to work with!
I agree we probably could use a "weighting" to Protector accounts that mean it takes less to kill some of these Russians, but a chaptcha is the only way to stop them in their tracks. Having to use humans would probably mean they bugger off to SO or somewhere but would probably annoy a lot of "normal" users.
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
Action has been taken. There's more to come if needed.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
In my settings, "Currently in Daylight Savings" is checked, but I just uploaded a file to my uploads (at 1:36 central time) time), and in the list of uploaded files, it's showing a file time of 12:36.
Something ain't right.
".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010
-
You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010
-
When you pry the gun from my cold dead hands, be careful - the barrel will be very hot. - JSOP, 2013
|
|
|
|
|
The funny part my message is in Soapbox.
|
|
|
|
|
The idiot spam filter has been working overtime the last few weeks.
I assume your message made it through?
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
You didn't paid the OT. That's why it complains. My message did went through though. Thanks
The best way to make your dreams come true is to wake up.
Paul Valery
|
|
|
|
|
Recently, on the Lounge, we've had language issue discussion from SuperLloyd, and Member 7989122; John Simmons is a member who often posts programming related topics with code on the Lounge.
I am not irritated by this, and I value greatly that the culture of CP is freedom over draconian rigor, but I do think (as I've said before) that content like that, which is often interesting, gets "submerged" in the Lounge spate, and, imho, that is a kind of loss for CP, since, if it went into the C# Language Forum, it would (possibly) contribute more, in the long term.
Can the folks with "Protector" status move the threads ? Should some members have the sanction to move the threads ? Am I making a mole-hill into a mud-pie ?
cheers, Bill
«There is a spectrum, from "clearly desirable behaviour," to "possibly dodgy behavior that still makes some sense," to "clearly undesirable behavior." We try to make the latter into warnings or, better, errors. But stuff that is in the middle category you don’t want to restrict unless there is a clear way to work around it.» Eric Lippert, May 14, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
Maybe they should pin topics started by me to the top in perpetuity. That way, I will never truly die. 
".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010
-
You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010
-
When you pry the gun from my cold dead hands, be careful - the barrel will be very hot. - JSOP, 2013
|
|
|
|
|
I'm not sure this answers Bill's concerns specifically.
But nice try.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
This is definitely something I've been considering for a while now.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
If more interesting topics are getting buried, maybe it's the other inane crap that gets posted in the Lounge that should be moved. This is a programmer's hangout fer christ's sake. When you walk into a bar, and talk to your friends, you talk/complain about work, women, guns and cars - not some retarded word game.
".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010
-
You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010
-
When you pry the gun from my cold dead hands, be careful - the barrel will be very hot. - JSOP, 2013
|
|
|
|
|
i have face this issue so many time . while posting a question/query i am unable to post the code in "what i have tried" section as well as message section. it remain blank as i submit my query
|
|
|
|
|
Add the appropriate <pre> </pre> tags around your code. You can get auto generated tags by hovering over the code button at the top of the main window and selecting the language from the drop down. You can then cut and paste the tags into the "What I have tried" section and place them around your code.
|
|
|
|
|
Beyond the tag requirement, how are articles selected for the article competitions? Is there some sort of criteria used? Is it random? The reason I ask is because I submitted an article in May and another in September, and neither article was included in the respective competitions (that I can see, at least).
".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010
-
You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010
-
When you pry the gun from my cold dead hands, be careful - the barrel will be very hot. - JSOP, 2013
|
|
|
|
|
It is done by tags and by popularity (which I believe is based on votes and rating). I ran the the numbers again for the April C# competition and your WPF Wizard article is definitely on the list, but not as high as the ones that were entered into the competition.
The September competition we will be running next month.
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
CodeProject
|
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
