Click here to Skip to main content
11,501,968 members (68,961 online)
Rate this: bad
good
Please Sign up or sign in to vote.
See more: MFC
Hello,
I am an MFC developer, &
I need to know your opinion here about MFC desktop apps development:
IS M$ Visual C++ 6.0 SP6 enough to develop MFC desktop apps,
OR should I install a newer version of M$ Visual Studio sash as M$ Visual Studio 2012
BECAUSE I am feeling that a newer version of M$ Visual Studio is VERY HEAVY to use only MFC on M$ Windows XP Operating System.

Thank you for your understanding.
Posted 14-Sep-12 14:38pm
tomay30001.2K
Comments
Sergey Alexandrovich Kryukov at 14-Sep-12 22:36pm
   
I think the question is not what to use to develop with MFC; the question is: using MFC or not. To me, it's hard to understand why using MFC at all.
--SA
tomay3000 at 15-Sep-12 9:56am
   
If so, then Microsoft should stop supporting MFC a long time ago, as for The Code Project.
See my Jesse Chisholm244 comment
Sergey Alexandrovich Kryukov at 16-Sep-12 23:39pm
   
This is not logical at all. This is not just like commercial stuff works. The seller always want to sell things, but do you always buy what a seller pushes on you. The seller will sell a product as long as there are enough fools to buy it. There is also such think as reputation... Companies use different approach to this...
--SA
Richard MacCutchan at 15-Sep-12 6:07am
   
If you need to develop in MFC then you should upgrade to VS2010 at the minimum.
tomay3000 at 15-Sep-12 9:59am
   
Are you telling me that there are many enhancements on MFC in VS 2010 !?
Richard MacCutchan at 15-Sep-12 10:17am
   
Yes, the later versions are sure to have enhancements and bug fixes over VC++ 6, which is now very old.
tomay3000 at 15-Sep-12 10:19am
   
Thank you very much for you opinion
See my "Jesse Chisholm244" comment
Sergey Alexandrovich Kryukov at 16-Sep-12 23:40pm
   
I think anything starting from VS2005 is good enough...
--SA

1 solution

Rate this: bad
good
Please Sign up or sign in to vote.

Solution 1

To complete Richard MacCutchen's response, ...
Here is a Wikipedia article[^] showing the history of MFC across the versions of the IDE.

ON THE ONE HAND: If you are happy with the level of features and stability and bugs in your compiler, and the "heavy weight" of getting a better IDE is more important to you, then you can continue using your current IDE.

ON THE OTHER HAND: But if any of the additional features, or bug fixes, or improvements in stability are essential to you (as they are to Richard and I and others) then you will move to the latest and greatest IDE.

BUT ON THE GRIPPING HAND: To grow as a developer, perhaps it is time to learn a new package beyond MFC. As Sergey says, To use MFC or not to use MFC, that is the question.

Take a look at C#, and WPF and the Prism framework on CodePlex[^].

I think you will like them.

-Jesse
  Permalink  
v2
Comments
tomay3000 at 16-Sep-12 14:31pm
   
- I am using MFC because it is portable like NOKIA Qt or gtk or Borland Delphi 7.0 or Borland C++ Builder 6.0, so you don't have to install any additional frameworks (.NET Framework 3.5 has 231 MB of size)
- I have seen that most of the apps installed on my desktop are portable apps (µTorrent, Notepad++, 7-Zip File Manager, Mozilla Firefox, Media Player Classic, Beyond Compare 3, Internet Download Manager, gBurner, PowerISO, mIRC, 010 Editor, ...) and many other desktop apps that most people of the world install them to there desktops.
- I have seen that most of the .NET apps are HEAVY to load on start.
- MFC + Codejock Xtreme Toolkit Professional = a great development toolkit (for me).
All of these properties and features of MFC made me use it.
Jesse Chisholm at 16-Sep-12 18:42pm
   
Excellent reasons for sticking with C/C++ as opposed to C#.

Most of the "weight" in C# programs is the .NET Framework, which is often already on the user's PC. But if the version of .NET you need isn't, then the install weight is heavy indeed.

If you are leaning towards open source, then check out OpenMFC: http://openmfc.codeplex.com/ though it appears to be still under development.

-Jesse
Sergey Alexandrovich Kryukov at 16-Sep-12 23:41pm
   
There are so many hands here... :-), so I could not go away without voting 5. :-)
--SA
Jesse Chisholm at 17-Sep-12 1:36am
   
The reference to "The Gripping Hand" is a reference to "A Mote in God's Eye" by David Brin. Well worth the time to find it and read it.

-Jesse
Sergey Alexandrovich Kryukov at 17-Sep-12 2:02am
   
Thank you.
--SA

This content, along with any associated source code and files, is licensed under The Code Project Open License (CPOL)



Advertise | Privacy | Mobile
Web04 | 2.8.150520.1 | Last Updated 16 Sep 2012
Copyright © CodeProject, 1999-2015
All Rights Reserved. Terms of Service
Layout: fixed | fluid

CodeProject, 503-250 Ferrand Drive Toronto Ontario, M3C 3G8 Canada +1 416-849-8900 x 100