Managed VB.NET Injection?

Question

0.00/5 (No votes)

See more:

.NET2.0

I have yet to see any tutorials showing how to do .NET Managed injection from a .NET process to another .NET process at runtime.
Is it possible?

Can anyone lead me in the right direction?

Posted 1-Apr-14 3:59am

Bebser

Add a Solution

Comments

Sergey Alexandrovich Kryukov 1-Apr-14 10:02am

Bad idea. The processes are isolated, for a good reason. Breaking this isolation is generally possible, but unsafe and inefficient. If the processes are not designed for some collaboration, of course.
May I ask you: why do you think you feel a need in such things? Perhaps, if you explain your ultimate goals, we could advise something practical?
—SA

Bebser 1-Apr-14 10:07am

To protect my assembly and for testing simple without needing to recompile a project, but make it able to just attach a new process doing the test stuff I need.

Sergey Alexandrovich Kryukov 1-Apr-14 16:19pm

It does not sound as a sufficient excuse for doing weird things. Also, it does not sound like an ultimate goal.

By the way, to talk to someone, you need to reply to someone's post. You commented on your own post, so I did not receive a notification. I noticed your answer only because I decided to check on it.

—SA

joshrduncan2012 1-Apr-14 17:29pm

*thumbs up*

Sergey Alexandrovich Kryukov 1-Apr-14 17:51pm

Thank you. :-)
Did you see my today's article yes. Please see until it's too late (you will understand why after you see it): http://www.codeproject.com/Articles/752137/Power-Over-IP-Testing-of-the-First...?
—SA

Bebser 2-Apr-14 2:43am

Well I want to inject a module into a process from the internet like:
Download encrypted bytes -> Unencrypt bytes -> Inject
As protection from being reversed :)

Sergey Alexandrovich Kryukov 2-Apr-14 9:52am

Sorry, as you are not explaining your ultimate goal, I'm not interested to discuss this problem.
Please understand me and don't take me wrong: I am just afraid of wasting my time for who-knows-what reason.
—SA

Bebser 2-Apr-14 18:52pm

I understand what you mean, but it's hard explaning what I exactly means.
But well I just believe not storing the exe on harddrive is the best protection together with different of anti-dump technics.

Sergey Alexandrovich Kryukov 2-Apr-14 19:13pm

Whatever. No explanation, no effort from my side, sorry.
And your second line is totally wrong. Who told you that?
—SA

Add your solution here

Treat my content as plain text, not as HTML

Preview 0

…

Existing Members

Sign in to your account

...or Join us

Download, Vote, Comment, Publish.

Your Email
Password
Forgot your password?

Your Email
This email is in use. Do you need your password?
Optional Password

I have read and agree to the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy
Please subscribe me to the CodeProject newsletters

When answering a question please:

Read the question carefully.
Understand that English isn't everyone's first language so be lenient of bad spelling and grammar.
If a question is poorly phrased then either ask for clarification, ignore it, or edit the question and fix the problem. Insults are not welcome.
Don't tell someone to read the manual. Chances are they have and don't get it. Provide an answer or move on to the next question.

Let's work to help developers, not make them feel stupid.

This content, along with any associated source code and files, is licensed under The Code Project Open License (CPOL)